CTAS vs FSV vs SNTL Stock Comparison

Cintas, FirstService and Sentinel Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CTAS Cintas Corp
$214.80 +7.4% 1M +13.8% 1Y
Market cap
$85.48B
P/E
41.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.56B
Div. yield
0.01%
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins
FSV FirstService Corp
$141.20 +9.8% 1M -13.2% 1Y
Market cap
$6.34B
P/E
55.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.68B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
1 win
SNTL Sentinel Holdings Ltd.
$1.35 -22.0% 1M -76.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.08M
P/E
0.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.58M
Div. yield
–
Security Services Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Cintas leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Cintas 6, Sentinel Holdings 4, FirstService 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCTASFSVSNTLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $85.48B $6.34B $13.08M CTAS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 41.5x 55.0x 0.9x SNTL
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 36.7x 24.2x — FSV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +9.5% +3.7% +250.7% SNTL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.8% 2.0% 311.9% SNTL
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 28.2% 10.0% — CTAS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.6x -0.1x SNTL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.8% -13.2% -76.3% CTAS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +15.1%/yr -6.9%/yr -7.6%/yr CTAS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.8% 30.6% 136.7% CTAS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 41/100 42/100 CTAS

Percentile Scorecard

CTASFSVSNTL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCTASFSVSNTL
Valuation 20 #90 of 112 41 #66 of 112 54 #52 of 112
Growth 71 #29 of 96 56 #43 of 96 97 #4 of 96
Profitability 98 #3 of 91 62 #35 of 91 46 #50 of 91
Financial Health 70 #38 of 125 39 #77 of 125 10 #113 of 125
Shareholder Returns 39 #41 of 67 8 #62 of 67 2 #66 of 67
Overall 60 41 42
  • CTAS ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • FSV ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • SNTL ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCTASFSVSNTLSPY
1 month +7.4%+9.8%-22.0% -0.2%
3 months 0.0%-1.3%-64.5% +3.9%
6 months +23.3%-1.3%-75.5% +8.2%
Year to date +14.2%-9.2%-78.1% +12.9%
1 year +13.8%-13.2%-76.3% +12.3%
3 years +73.1%+3.0%-77.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year +20.1%+1.0%-39.2% +23.3%
5 years +101.7%-29.9%-32.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year +15.1%-6.9%-7.6% +10.9%
10 years +713.1%+235.6%+1,025.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year +23.3%+12.9%+27.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCTASFSVSNTLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.8%30.6%136.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 24.3%31.1%166.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.110.65-0.60 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.58-0.43-0.56 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -28.2%-44.0%-80.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.9%-14.5%-78.7% -1.2%
52-week high $225.93$165.10$6.35 $779.14
52-week low $163.55$125.66$1.27 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCTASFSVSNTL
P/E now vs peer median 41.7xmedian 21.2x 55.8xmedian 21.2x 0.9xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 0.9x 1.1xmedian 0.9x 2.9xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 11.9x 14.6xmedian 11.9x -3.2xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 42.2xmedian 13.7x 12.0xmedian 13.7x 6.0xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 16.5xmedian 2.4x 6.9xmedian 2.4x -3.6xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.75median 1.00 149.61median 1.00 0.01median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCTASFSVSNTL
Revenue $11.56B $5.68B $4.58M
Gross profit $5.89B $1.88B $340.92K
Operating income $2.70B $339.62M -$4.61M
Net income $2.06B $199.45M -$881.22K
Free cash flow $2.03B $536.84M $2.17M
EPS (diluted) $5.10 $2.52 $1.47
Cash & equivalents $243.60M $160.76M $146.09K
Total debt $2.43B $1.55B $3.26M
Shares (diluted) 404.29M 45.75M 9.69M
Enterprise value $84.56B $5.66B $11.74M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCTASFSVSNTL
P/E 41.7x 55.8x 0.9x
P/FCF 42.2x 12.0x 6.0x
P/Operating cash flow 35.3x 15.5x 5.6x
P/S 7.4x 1.1x 2.9x
P/B 16.5x 6.9x -3.6x
P/Tangible book 17.4x 6.9x -2.9x
EV/EBITDA 27.4x 14.6x -3.2x
EV/EBIT 32.6x 23.1x -2.9x
EV/Revenue 7.6x 1.4x 2.9x
EV/FCF 43.3x 14.6x 6.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 36.2x 18.8x 5.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.75 149.61 0.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCTASFSVSNTL
Revenue growth (1Y) 9.5% 3.7% 250.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 9.9% -19.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.5% 2.6% 156.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.2% 11.0% -38.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 11.8% -0.6% 43.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.2% 8.7% 2.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 11.3% 4.7% 90.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 6.0% 22.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 12.3% 322.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 0.4% 104.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% 0.1% 328.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.4% 23.1% 245.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 19.5% -1.6% 312.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.4% 19.6% 237.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCTASFSVSNTL
Gross margin 51.0% 33.1% 7.4%
EBITDA margin 27.8% 9.5% -91.9%
Operating margin 23.4% 6.0% -100.8%
Pretax margin 22.5% 4.8% -18.1%
Net margin 17.8% 2.0% 311.9%
FCF margin 17.6% 9.4% 47.4%
Operating cash flow margin 21.1% 7.4% 50.6%
Return on equity 39.8% 18.5% –
Return on assets 19.5% 4.5% -40.8%
Return on invested capital 28.2% 10.0% –
Return on capital employed 34.2% 9.8% –
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.3x 2.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.2x 2.1x -2.6x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCTASFSVSNTL
Debt / assets 22.8% 34.9% 27.8%
Debt / equity 0.5x 1.7x -0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 2.6x -0.1x
Debt / FCF 1.2x 2.9x 0.3x
Liabilities / assets 51.1% 78.9% 279.9%
Equity / assets 48.9% 21.1% -179.9%
Interest coverage 25.3x – -9.2x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.7x 0.2x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.2x 0.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.2x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 13.27 – -24.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCTASFSVSNTL
Dividend yield 0.9% 1.0% –
Net buyback yield 1.2% -9.4% -15.6%
Shareholder yield 2.0% -8.3% -15.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) 35.2% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 35.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 14.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 15.5% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCTASFSVSNTL
Forward P/E 36.7xFY2026 24.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $5.85FY2026 $5.84FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +18.4%FY2026 +2.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +10.4% +9.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $12.98BFY2026 $5.42BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +15.3%FY2026 -1.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +20.0% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCTASFSVSNTL
Held by institutions 67.6% 69.9% –
Institutions holding 1,430 275 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.4% +7.2% –
Institutions buying 657 147 –
Institutions selling 576 101 –
Buyers to sellers 1.14 1.46 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CTASFSVSNTL
CTAS 1.00 0.38 -0.01
FSV 0.38 1.00 0.05
SNTL -0.01 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CTAS, FSV and SNTL?

Cintas (CTAS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cintas (CTAS) $85.48B, FirstService (FSV) $6.34B, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) $13.08M.

Which stock is cheaper, CTAS, FSV and SNTL?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cintas (CTAS) 41.5x, FirstService (FSV) 55.0x, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 0.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, FirstService (FSV) is cheapest (Cintas (CTAS) 36.7x, FirstService (FSV) 24.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cintas (CTAS) +9.5%, FirstService (FSV) +3.7%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) +250.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) has the highest net margin (Cintas (CTAS) 17.8%, FirstService (FSV) 2.0%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 311.9%). On return on invested capital, Cintas (CTAS) leads (Cintas (CTAS) 28.2%, FirstService (FSV) 10.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cintas (CTAS) returned the most: Cintas (CTAS) +13.8%, FirstService (FSV) -13.2%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -76.3%. Over five years, Cintas (CTAS) compounded fastest (Cintas (CTAS) +15.1%/yr, FirstService (FSV) -6.9%/yr, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) -7.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cintas (CTAS) 0.01%, FirstService (FSV) 0.00%. FirstService (FSV) and Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cintas (CTAS) has been the steadiest (Cintas (CTAS) 23.8%, FirstService (FSV) 30.6%, Sentinel Holdings (SNTL) 136.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CTAS, FSV and SNTL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cintas (CTAS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.