CSTM vs LXFR vs STKH Stock Comparison

Constellium Se, Luxfer Holdings and Steakholder Foods Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSTM Constellium Se
$24.44 -0.8% 1M +44.5% 1Y
Market cap
$3.28B
P/E
5.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.05B
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
10 wins
LXFR Luxfer Holdings Plc
$17.25 -0.2% 1M +30.2% 1Y
Market cap
$462.00M
P/E
74.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$355.20M
Div. yield
–
Metal Fabrication Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Constellium Se leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (Constellium Se 10, Luxfer Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSTMLXFRSTKHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.28B $462.00M $52.59K CSTM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 5.7x 74.5x — CSTM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 5.8x 17.4x — CSTM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.1% -11.8% — CSTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 5.7% 1.7% — CSTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.9% 5.2% — CSTM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 1.2x — CSTM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +44.5% +30.2% -89.5% CSTM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +5.8%/yr -3.0%/yr -83.4%/yr CSTM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.8% 33.2% 225.6% LXFR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 75/100 52/100 — CSTM

Percentile Scorecard

CSTMLXFRSTKH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSTMLXFRSTKH
Valuation 98 #6 of 203 57 #87 of 203 –
Growth 100 #1 of 188 19 #152 of 188 –
Profitability 66 #64 of 184 39 #113 of 184 –
Financial Health 21 #172 of 217 68 #71 of 217 75 #55 of 217
Shareholder Returns 90 #16 of 153 77 #36 of 153 –
Overall 75 52 –
  • CSTM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • LXFR ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • STKH ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSTMLXFRSTKHSPY
1 month -0.8%-0.2%-76.7% +0.9%
3 months -11.4%+1.1%-86.0% +5.9%
6 months -24.2%+21.1%-79.5% +8.5%
Year to date +29.7%+27.5%-83.5% +13.3%
1 year +44.5%+30.2%-89.5% +12.4%
3 years +59.5%+101.8%-99.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year +16.9%+26.4%-88.9% +23.5%
5 years +32.8%-14.2%-100.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year +5.8%-3.0%-83.4% +11.0%
10 years +365.5%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year +16.6%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCSTMLXFRSTKHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.8%33.2%225.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 42.0%39.1%172.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.930.961.64 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.990.91-0.40 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -66.3%-67.3%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.4%-9.6%-91.2% -0.9%
52-week high $36.15$19.08$4.30 $779.14
52-week low $14.75$11.51$0.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSTMLXFRSTKH
P/E now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 25.4x 74.5xmedian 25.4x —median 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.9x 1.3xmedian 1.9x —median 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 14.3x 15.5xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.3xmedian 21.8x 24.4xmedian 21.8x —median 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 2.2x 2.1xmedian 2.2x 0.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.41 56.42median 1.41 —median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSTMLXFRSTKH
Revenue $10.05B $355.20M –
Gross profit $1.61B $89.00M –
Operating income $1.20B $22.40M –
Net income $576.00M $6.20M –
Free cash flow $319.00M $18.90M –
R&D $53.00M $5.60M –
EPS (diluted) $4.13 $0.23 –
Cash & equivalents $158.00M $19.90M $1.06M
Total debt $1.82B $57.70M –
Shares (diluted) 138.99M 27.30M 124.02K
Enterprise value $2.69B $407.50M -$6.84M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSTMLXFRSTKH
P/E 5.7x 74.5x –
P/FCF 10.3x 24.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 5.2x 15.4x –
P/S 0.3x 1.3x –
P/B 2.5x 2.1x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 2.2x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA 3.2x 15.5x –
EV/EBIT 4.1x 22.3x –
EV/Revenue 0.5x 1.4x –
EV/FCF 15.5x 26.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow 7.8x 16.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 56.42 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSTMLXFRSTKH
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.1% -11.8% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -5.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 54.0% -3.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 82.1% 0.0% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -4.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 400.9% -56.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 1.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 413.6% -56.9% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 1.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 92.2% -31.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 897.5% -47.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 0.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSTMLXFRSTKH
Gross margin 16.1% 25.1% –
EBITDA margin 15.3% 9.1% –
Operating margin 11.9% 6.3% –
Pretax margin 8.1% 5.2% –
Net margin 5.7% 1.7% –
FCF margin 3.2% 5.3% –
Operating cash flow margin 6.3% 8.4% –
Return on equity 44.4% 2.8% –
Return on assets 9.7% 1.6% –
Return on invested capital 26.9% 5.2% –
Return on capital employed 31.0% 7.3% –
Asset turnover 1.7x 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 4.8x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSTMLXFRSTKH
Debt / assets 31.0% 15.1% –
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.1x 1.2x –
Debt / FCF 5.7x 3.1x –
Liabilities / assets 77.1% 42.1% 27.9%
Equity / assets 22.9% 57.9% 72.1%
Interest coverage 11.0x 6.6x –
Current ratio 1.5x 2.5x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.1x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.3x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 3.22 3.56 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSTMLXFRSTKH
Dividend yield – 2.3% –
Net buyback yield 3.6% 0.6% –
Shareholder yield 3.6% 2.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSTMLXFRSTKH
Forward P/E 5.8xFY2026 17.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.18FY2026 $0.99FY2026 $-550.39FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +237.1%FY2026 -10.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -32.3% +41.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $10.71BFY2026 $386.72MFY2026 $57.45MFY2025
Revenue growth, next FY +26.8%FY2026 +4.2%FY2026 +574,390.0%FY2025
Revenue growth, the year after +1.3% +2.6% -42.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSTMLXFRSTKH
Held by institutions 88.6% 91.6% –
Institutions holding 384 136 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -4.5% -1.6% –
Institutions buying 255 76 –
Institutions selling 108 41 –
Buyers to sellers 2.36 1.85 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSTMLXFRSTKH
CSTM 1.00 0.33 0.06
LXFR 0.33 1.00 0.02
STKH 0.06 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSTM, LXFR and STKH?

Constellium Se (CSTM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Constellium Se (CSTM) $3.28B, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) $462.00M, Steakholder Foods (STKH) $52.59K.

Which stock is cheaper, CSTM, LXFR and STKH?

Constellium Se (CSTM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.7x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 74.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Constellium Se (CSTM) is cheapest (Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.8x, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 17.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Constellium Se (CSTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Constellium Se (CSTM) +26.1%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -11.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Constellium Se (CSTM) has the highest net margin (Constellium Se (CSTM) 5.7%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 1.7%). On return on invested capital, Constellium Se (CSTM) leads (Constellium Se (CSTM) 26.9%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 5.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Constellium Se (CSTM) returned the most: Constellium Se (CSTM) +44.5%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) +30.2%, Steakholder Foods (STKH) -89.5%. Over five years, Constellium Se (CSTM) compounded fastest (Constellium Se (CSTM) +5.8%/yr, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) -3.0%/yr, Steakholder Foods (STKH) -83.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) has been the steadiest (Constellium Se (CSTM) 44.8%, Luxfer Holdings (LXFR) 33.2%, Steakholder Foods (STKH) 225.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSTM, LXFR and STKH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Constellium Se (CSTM) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.