CSIQ vs RNW vs JKS Stock Comparison

Canadian Solar, ReNew Energy Global and JinkoSolar Holding Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSIQ Canadian Solar Inc.
$9.59 -8.0% 1M -36.7% 1Y
Market cap
$650.30M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.99B
Div. yield
–
Solar Equipment Industrials
RNW ReNew Energy Global plc
$6.87 +0.4% 1M -11.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.01B
P/E
20.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.50B
Div. yield
–
Renewable Power Producers Utilities
8 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

ReNew Energy Global leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (ReNew Energy Global 8, JinkoSolar Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSIQRNWJKSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $650.30M $5.01B $432.47M RNW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -2.7x 20.5x 16.3x JKS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 27.5x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -15.7% +12.6% -22.1% RNW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -4.9% 8.1% 0.3% RNW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -0.2% 2.3% -5.9% RNW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -0.2x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 18.16% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -36.7% -11.5% -63.3% RNW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.4%/yr -7.1%/yr -32.7%/yr RNW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 92.4% 43.3% 60.6% RNW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 46/100 68/100 50/100 RNW

Percentile Scorecard

CSIQRNWJKS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSIQRNWJKS
Valuation 87 #9 of 61 91 #3 of 24 98 #2 of 61
Growth 12 #51 of 58 82 #5 of 23 19 #47 of 58
Profitability 63 #21 of 55 91 #3 of 23 59 #23 of 55
Financial Health 21 #56 of 71 44 #14 of 24 24 #54 of 71
Shareholder Returns – 33 #13 of 19 –
Overall 46 68 50
  • CSIQ ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • RNW ranked among 24 companies in Power Generation
  • JKS ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSIQRNWJKSSPY
1 month -8.0%+0.4%-10.2% +0.9%
3 months -30.1%+14.7%-43.4% +5.9%
6 months -34.9%+35.5%-61.6% +8.5%
Year to date -59.7%+21.6%-68.0% +13.3%
1 year -36.7%-11.5%-63.3% +12.4%
3 years -50.1%+25.8%-68.1% +88.1%
3 years, per year -20.7%+8.0%-31.7% +23.5%
5 years -76.9%-31.0%-86.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year -25.4%-7.1%-32.7% +11.0%
10 years -35.0%—-47.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year -4.2%—-6.3% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCSIQRNWJKSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 92.4%43.3%60.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 99.3%56.8%61.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.660.721.73 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.40-0.26-1.04 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.6%-58.7%-89.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.4%-11.5%-73.0% -0.9%
52-week high $33.58$7.76$30.58 $779.14
52-week low $8.85$4.50$8.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSIQRNWJKS
P/E now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 29.4x 20.5xmedian 24.9x 16.3xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 2.6x 3.3xmedian 2.7x 0.1xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 18.4x 10.7xmedian 11.6x —median 18.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 24.4x 4.9xmedian 13.8x —median 24.4x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.8x 3.1xmedian 2.1x 0.1xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.07median 1.07 0.04median 0.61 -0.26median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSIQRNWJKS
Revenue $4.99B $1.50B $8.37B
Gross profit $820.00M – $397.19M
Operating income -$27.67M $158.00M -$28.57M
Net income -$251.16M $122.00M -$936.28M
Free cash flow $311.68M $1.01B –
R&D $83.20M – $137.15M
EPS (diluted) $-3.60 $11.29 $0.51
Cash & equivalents $1.46B $233.00M $2.50B
Total debt $24.65B $240.00M $22.30B
Shares (diluted) 67.37M 10.81M 52.10M
Enterprise value -$4.22B $3.42B -$10.55B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSIQRNWJKS
P/E -2.7x 20.5x 16.3x
P/FCF 2.1x 4.9x –
P/Operating cash flow -1.1x 4.9x –
P/S 0.1x 3.3x 0.1x
P/B 0.2x 3.1x 0.1x
P/Tangible book 0.2x 3.1x 0.1x
EV/EBITDA – 10.7x –
EV/EBIT -201.2x 31.2x -6.1x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 3.3x 0.4x
EV/FCF 17.9x 4.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow -9.8x 4.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.07 0.04 -0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSIQRNWJKS
Revenue growth (1Y) -15.7% 12.6% -22.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -14.4% 16.7% -17.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -26.1% – -41.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -17.7% – -44.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 48.9% -12.0% 96.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -27.0% 31.4% -27.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -44.9% 9.9% 1.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -35.7% 85.2% -46.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -9.9% 9.9% 104.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -36.0% 512.3% -62.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -135.9% 20.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.4% 6.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -51.2% 20.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -43.3% 6.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSIQRNWJKS
Gross margin 16.4% – 4.7%
EBITDA margin – 30.9% –
Operating margin -0.6% 10.5% -0.3%
Pretax margin -3.7% 10.3% -0.5%
Net margin -4.9% 8.1% 0.3%
FCF margin 6.2% 67.6% –
Operating cash flow margin -11.4% 67.6% –
Return on equity -6.3% 7.7% -24.5%
Return on assets -1.6% 1.1% -5.3%
Return on invested capital -0.2% 2.3% -5.9%
Return on capital employed -0.3% 2.0% -5.9%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.1x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x 8.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSIQRNWJKS
Debt / assets 39.6% 2.1% 31.2%
Debt / equity 1.6x 0.1x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – -0.2x –
Debt / FCF 20.5x 0.2x –
Liabilities / assets 75.6% 85.8% 78.7%
Equity / assets 24.4% 14.2% 21.3%
Interest coverage -0.1x – -4.8x
Current ratio 1.0x 0.4x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 0.47 0.22 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSIQRNWJKS
Dividend yield – – 18.2%
Net buyback yield – -3.2% –
Shareholder yield – -3.2% 18.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSIQRNWJKS
Forward P/E – 27.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.62FY2026 $0.25FY2026 $-5.57FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -21.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +96.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.88BFY2026 $1.80BFY2026 $9.09BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.0%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026 -2.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +21.9% -2.4% +29.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSIQRNWJKS
Held by institutions 60.5% 40.7% 32.8%
Institutions holding 156 144 111
Change in shares held, QoQ +23.0% +0.9% +8.7%
Institutions buying 98 104 61
Institutions selling 32 28 30
Buyers to sellers 3.06 3.71 2.03

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSIQRNWJKS
CSIQ 1.00 0.12 0.57
RNW 0.12 1.00 0.05
JKS 0.57 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSIQ, RNW and JKS?

ReNew Energy Global (RNW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canadian Solar (CSIQ) $650.30M, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) $5.01B, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) $432.47M.

Which stock is cheaper, CSIQ, RNW and JKS?

JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Canadian Solar (CSIQ) -2.7x, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) 20.5x, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) 16.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

ReNew Energy Global (RNW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Canadian Solar (CSIQ) -15.7%, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) +12.6%, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) -22.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

ReNew Energy Global (RNW) has the highest net margin (Canadian Solar (CSIQ) -4.9%, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) 8.1%, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) 0.3%). On return on invested capital, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) leads (Canadian Solar (CSIQ) -0.2%, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) 2.3%, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) -5.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ReNew Energy Global (RNW) returned the most: Canadian Solar (CSIQ) -36.7%, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) -11.5%, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) -63.3%. Over five years, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) compounded fastest (Canadian Solar (CSIQ) -25.4%/yr, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) -7.1%/yr, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) -32.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) 18.16%. Canadian Solar (CSIQ) and ReNew Energy Global (RNW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) has been the steadiest (Canadian Solar (CSIQ) 92.4%, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) 43.3%, JinkoSolar Holding (JKS) 60.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSIQ, RNW and JKS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, ReNew Energy Global (RNW) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.