CSCO vs IOTR vs KHOBF Stock Comparison

Cisco Systems, iOThree and Kheoba Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.
$111.38 +4.4% 1M +56.0% 1Y
Market cap
$435.42B
P/E
32.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$63.33B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
2 wins
IOTR iOThree Ltd
$2.10 +5.5% 1M -31.4% 1Y
Market cap
$5.68M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

3 decided of 12

Cisco Systems leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Cisco Systems 2, Kheoba 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSCOIOTRKHOBFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $435.42B $5.68M $20.23M CSCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.8x -4.8x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.5x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.0% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +56.0% -31.4% 0.0% CSCO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.7%/yr — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.5% 146.1% 0.0% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 54/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

CSCOIOTRKHOBF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSCOIOTRKHOBF
Valuation 32 #76 of 112 56 #50 of 112 –
Growth 41 #65 of 109 – –
Profitability 87 #14 of 104 – –
Financial Health 30 #82 of 116 49 #60 of 116 82 #20 of 108
Shareholder Returns 79 #18 of 81 – –
Overall 54 – –
  • CSCO ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • IOTR ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSCOIOTRKHOBFSPY
1 month +4.4%+5.5%0.0% -0.2%
3 months -3.6%-30.7%0.0% +3.9%
6 months +28.2%-28.6%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date +44.6%-13.9%0.0% +12.9%
1 year +56.0%-31.4%0.0% +12.3%
3 years +116.0%—— +87.4%
3 years, per year +29.3%—— +23.3%
5 years +98.0%—— +67.9%
5 years, per year +14.7%—— +10.9%
10 years +266.6%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.9%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCSCOIOTRKHOBFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.5%146.1%0.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.3%125.8%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.111.420.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.58-0.21— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.6%-96.2%-37.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.3%-60.6%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $130.00$5.33$2.50 $779.14
52-week low $71.04$1.56$2.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSCOIOTRKHOBF
P/E now vs peer median 33.2xmedian 33.2x -4.8xmedian 33.2x —median 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 2.8x 0.3xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.3xmedian 20.0x —median 20.0x —median 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.4xmedian 29.8x -1.7xmedian 29.8x —median 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 3.0x 1.1xmedian 3.0x 122.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 12.32median 1.17 —median 1.17 —median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSCOIOTRKHOBF
Revenue $63.33B – –
Gross profit $40.86B – –
Operating income $15.37B – –
Net income $13.27B – –
Free cash flow $12.77B – –
R&D $9.56B – –
EPS (diluted) $3.33 – –
Cash & equivalents $7.22B $2.12M $318.16K
Total debt $29.53B $376.70K –
Shares (diluted) 3.99B 2.64M 8.09M
Enterprise value $371.35B $1.28M $19.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSCOIOTRKHOBF
P/E 33.2x -4.8x –
P/FCF 34.4x -1.7x –
P/Operating cash flow 31.0x – –
P/S 6.9x 0.3x –
P/B 8.7x 1.1x 122.0x
P/Tangible book 10.3x 1.2x 125.8x
EV/EBITDA 25.3x – –
EV/EBIT 29.5x – –
EV/Revenue 7.2x – –
EV/FCF 35.5x – –
EV/Operating cash flow 32.0x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.32 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSCOIOTRKHOBF
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.6% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.1% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.6% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 30.7% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.7% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 30.3% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.7% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 30.7% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.7% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.1% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.7% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.9% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.5% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSCOIOTRKHOBF
Gross margin 64.5% – –
EBITDA margin 28.3% – –
Operating margin 24.3% – –
Pretax margin 25.3% – –
Net margin 21.0% – –
FCF margin 20.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin 22.4% – –
Return on equity 26.8% – –
Return on assets 10.4% – –
Return on invested capital 15.9% – –
Return on capital employed 17.9% – –
Asset turnover 0.5x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – –
Stock comp / revenue 6.0% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSCOIOTRKHOBF
Debt / assets 22.8% 4.4% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.1x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x – –
Debt / FCF 2.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 47.3% 49.8%
Equity / assets 38.8% 52.7% 50.2%
Interest coverage 10.5x – –
Current ratio 0.9x 1.8x 2.0x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.0x 2.0x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.7x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 4.19 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSCOIOTRKHOBF
Dividend yield 1.5% – –
Net buyback yield 1.3% – –
Shareholder yield 2.8% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSCOIOTRKHOBF
Forward P/E 23.5xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.74FY2027 – –
EPS growth, next FY +9.5%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +20.7% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $74.93BFY2027 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +18.3%FY2027 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +0.6% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSCOIOTRKHOBF
Held by institutions 80.1% – –
Institutions holding 4,046 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% – –
Institutions buying 1,847 – –
Institutions selling 1,817 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.02 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSCOIOTRKHOBF
CSCO 1.00 0.06 –
IOTR 0.06 1.00 –
KHOBF – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSCO, IOTR and KHOBF?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cisco Systems (CSCO) $435.42B, iOThree (IOTR) $5.68M, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cisco Systems (CSCO) returned the most: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +56.0%, iOThree (IOTR) -31.4%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 35.5%, iOThree (IOTR) 146.1%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSCO, IOTR and KHOBF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cisco Systems (CSCO) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.