CSCO vs DDOG vs NABL Stock Comparison

Cisco Systems, Datadog and N-able Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.
$110.29 +3.3% 1M +51.9% 1Y
Market cap
$428.90B
P/E
32.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$63.33B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
7 wins
DDOG Datadog, Inc.
$278.41 +3.6% 1M +77.0% 1Y
Market cap
$94.16B
P/E
530.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.97B
Div. yield
–
IT Operations Software Technology
3 wins
NABL N-able, Inc.
$5.28 +30.0% 1M -35.4% 1Y
Market cap
$967.68M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$530.82M
Div. yield
–
IT Operations Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Cisco Systems leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Cisco Systems 7, Datadog 3, N-able 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSCODDOGNABLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $428.90B $94.16B $967.68M CSCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 32.3x 530.2x -140.5x CSCO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.3x 102.4x 13.9x NABL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.8% +31.5% +10.1% DDOG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 21.0% 4.5% -1.3% CSCO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.9% — 0.0% CSCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x — 2.8x CSCO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.9% +77.0% -35.4% DDOG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.5%/yr +10.8%/yr -16.9%/yr CSCO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.5% 69.0% 77.0% CSCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 66/100 56/100 DDOG

Percentile Scorecard

CSCODDOGNABL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSCODDOGNABL
Valuation 33 #75 of 111 33 #84 of 124 94 #9 of 124
Growth 40 #65 of 108 89 #13 of 113 13 #98 of 113
Profitability 88 #13 of 104 77 #26 of 109 66 #38 of 109
Financial Health 31 #80 of 115 76 #31 of 127 29 #90 of 127
Shareholder Returns 82 #15 of 78 55 #29 of 63 77 #15 of 63
Overall 55 66 56
  • CSCO ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • DDOG ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NABL ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSCODDOGNABLSPY
1 month +3.3%+3.6%+30.0% +0.9%
3 months -1.9%+5.4%+17.6% +5.9%
6 months +23.1%+107.8%0.0% +8.5%
Year to date +43.2%+104.7%-29.4% +13.3%
1 year +51.9%+77.0%-35.4% +12.4%
3 years +113.9%+240.9%-58.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +28.9%+50.5%-25.5% +23.5%
5 years +97.1%+66.7%-60.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year +14.5%+10.8%-16.9% +11.0%
10 years +260.5%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year +13.7%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCSCODDOGNABLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.5%69.0%77.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.1%59.7%94.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.101.280.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.461.12-0.46 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.6%-68.1%-80.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.2%-5.1%-37.9% -0.9%
52-week high $130.00$293.26$8.50 $779.14
52-week low $71.04$102.61$3.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSCODDOGNABL
P/E now vs peer median 32.9xmedian 33.5x 558.5xmedian 37.9x -144.6xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 2.8x 25.2xmedian 4.4x 1.9xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 25.1xmedian 19.6x 579.5xmedian 34.5x 13.0xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 34.1xmedian 29.8x 84.5xmedian 26.6x 14.1xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 2.9x 22.9xmedian 3.4x 1.2xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 12.20median 1.10 9.83median 1.24 4.17median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSCODDOGNABL
Revenue $63.33B $3.97B $530.82M
Gross profit $40.86B $3.15B $406.11M
Operating income $15.37B $16.33M $50.45M
Net income $13.27B $177.58M -$6.89M
Free cash flow $12.77B $1.18B $70.77M
R&D $9.56B $1.73B $103.26M
EPS (diluted) $3.33 $0.48 $-0.04
Cash & equivalents $7.22B $434.96M $115.81M
Total debt $29.53B – $392.33M
Shares (diluted) 3.99B 371.02M 189.12M
Enterprise value $364.83B $75.80B $520.79M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSCODDOGNABL
P/E 32.9x 558.5x -144.6x
P/FCF 34.1x 84.5x 14.1x
P/Operating cash flow 30.7x 81.3x 10.7x
P/S 6.9x 25.2x 1.9x
P/B 8.7x 22.9x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 10.2x 23.0x 1.3x
EV/EBITDA 25.1x 579.5x 13.0x
EV/EBIT 29.2x 5,815x 25.3x
EV/Revenue 7.1x 23.9x 2.4x
EV/FCF 35.2x 80.3x 18.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 31.7x 77.3x 13.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 12.20 9.83 4.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSCODDOGNABL
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.8% 31.5% 10.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 27.9% 10.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.1% 30.8% 6.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.6% 28.0% 7.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 30.7% 189.5% -2.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.7% 28.7% -3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 30.3% 42.5% -309.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 1.7% 60.5% -34.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 30.7% 37.8% -309.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 2.7% 56.8% -34.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -0.1% 27.3% 1.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -10.7% 36.3% 11.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.9% 27.7% -4.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -12.5% 37.6% 10.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSCODDOGNABL
Gross margin 64.5% 79.5% 76.5%
EBITDA margin 28.3% 4.1% 18.4%
Operating margin 24.3% 0.4% 9.5%
Pretax margin 25.3% 5.0% 2.6%
Net margin 21.0% 4.5% -1.3%
FCF margin 20.2% 29.8% 13.3%
Operating cash flow margin 22.4% 31.0% 17.6%
Return on equity 26.8% 4.2% -0.9%
Return on assets 10.4% 2.4% -0.5%
Return on invested capital 15.9% – 0.0%
Return on capital employed 17.9% 0.3% 4.1%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.5x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x 6.9x -13.6x
Stock comp / revenue 6.0% 20.7% 8.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSCODDOGNABL
Debt / assets 22.8% – 28.1%
Debt / equity 0.6x – 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x – 2.8x
Debt / FCF 2.3x – 5.5x
Liabilities / assets 61.2% 42.1% 42.3%
Equity / assets 38.8% 57.9% 57.7%
Interest coverage 10.5x 1.4x –
Current ratio 0.9x 3.2x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 3.2x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.4x 2.7x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 4.16 20.09 1.61

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSCODDOGNABL
Dividend yield 1.5% – –
Net buyback yield 1.3% -0.1% 1.8%
Shareholder yield 2.8% -0.1% 1.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSCODDOGNABL
Forward P/E 23.3xFY2027 102.4xFY2026 13.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.74FY2027 $2.72FY2026 $0.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.5%FY2027 +32.7%FY2026 -2.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +20.7% +1.8% +15.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $74.93BFY2027 $4.18BFY2026 $528.45MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.3%FY2027 +21.7%FY2026 +3.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +0.6% +24.9% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSCODDOGNABL
Held by institutions 80.1% 90.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 4,046 1,265 200
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% +6.1% +1.8%
Institutions buying 1,847 738 106
Institutions selling 1,817 432 66
Buyers to sellers 1.02 1.71 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSCODDOGNABL
CSCO 1.00 0.11 -0.13
DDOG 0.11 1.00 0.20
NABL -0.13 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSCO, DDOG and NABL?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cisco Systems (CSCO) $428.90B, Datadog (DDOG) $94.16B, N-able (NABL) $967.68M.

Which stock is cheaper, CSCO, DDOG and NABL?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 32.3x, Datadog (DDOG) 530.2x, N-able (NABL) -140.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, N-able (NABL) is cheapest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 23.3x, Datadog (DDOG) 102.4x, N-able (NABL) 13.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Datadog (DDOG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +11.8%, Datadog (DDOG) +31.5%, N-able (NABL) +10.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) has the highest net margin (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 21.0%, Datadog (DDOG) 4.5%, N-able (NABL) -1.3%). On return on invested capital, Cisco Systems (CSCO) leads (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 15.9%, N-able (NABL) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Datadog (DDOG) returned the most: Cisco Systems (CSCO) +51.9%, Datadog (DDOG) +77.0%, N-able (NABL) -35.4%. Over five years, Cisco Systems (CSCO) compounded fastest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) +14.5%/yr, Datadog (DDOG) +10.8%/yr, N-able (NABL) -16.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cisco Systems (CSCO) has been the steadiest (Cisco Systems (CSCO) 35.5%, Datadog (DDOG) 69.0%, N-able (NABL) 77.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSCO, DDOG and NABL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cisco Systems (CSCO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.