CSCIF vs PAHC vs RDGL Stock Comparison

COSCIENS Biopharma, Phibro Animal Health and Vivos Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CSCIF COSCIENS Biopharma Inc.
$6.17 -4.5% 1M +140.1% 1Y
Market cap
$19.64M
P/E
4.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.89M
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
3 wins
RDGL Vivos Inc
$0.05 +25.0% 1M -37.5% 1Y
Market cap
$22.77M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$68.38K
Div. yield
–
Medical Devices Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Phibro Animal Health leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Phibro Animal Health 4, COSCIENS Biopharma 3, Vivos 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCSCIFPAHCRDGLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.64M $1.54B $22.77M PAHC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.8x 15.4x -7.4x CSCIF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.1x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -11.6% +17.1% +144.3% RDGL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 51.4% 6.6% -4,483.9% CSCIF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.1x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.27% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +140.1% -9.1% -37.5% CSCIF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -36.4%/yr +11.5%/yr -13.0%/yr PAHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 209.7% 55.5% 122.1% PAHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 68/100 26/100 PAHC

Percentile Scorecard

CSCIFPAHCRDGL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCSCIFPAHCRDGL
Valuation 17 #78 of 94 92 #52 of 625 8 #208 of 227
Growth 29 #65 of 91 85 #90 of 602 14 #189 of 219
Profitability 46 #46 of 84 85 #81 of 549 2 #201 of 205
Financial Health 77 #22 of 94 26 #485 of 654 90 #25 of 237
Shareholder Returns – 54 #171 of 367 17 #112 of 135
Overall 42 68 26
  • CSCIF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • PAHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • RDGL ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCSCIFPAHCRDGLSPY
1 month -4.5%+6.1%+25.0% +0.9%
3 months +23.4%+2.5%-16.7% +5.9%
6 months +216.4%-27.8%-28.6% +8.5%
Year to date +199.5%+1.4%-28.6% +13.3%
1 year +140.1%-9.1%-37.5% +12.4%
3 years +1.5%+251.7%-16.7% +88.1%
3 years, per year +0.5%+52.1%-5.9% +23.5%
5 years -89.5%+72.7%-50.0% +68.2%
5 years, per year -36.4%+11.5%-13.0% +11.0%
10 years -98.4%+45.4%-95.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year -33.8%+3.8%-26.7% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCSCIFPAHCRDGLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 209.7%55.5%122.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 204.0%59.8%285.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.970.75-0.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.67-0.16-0.31 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -98.8%-57.9%-84.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -16.1%-36.4%-44.4% -0.9%
52-week high $7.35$59.58$0.09 $779.14
52-week low $0.79$28.52$0.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCSCIFPAHCRDGL
P/E now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 22.0x 15.4xmedian 17.4x -7.4xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 1.4x 1.0xmedian 9.1x 333.1xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 12.4x 8.1xmedian 17.1x —median 17.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -2.2xmedian 15.5x 155.7xmedian 19.0x -11.1xmedian 25.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.7x 4.0xmedian 2.2x 13.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -0.90median 1.84 0.35median 0.34 -5.99median 1.03

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCSCIFPAHCRDGL
Revenue $7.89M $1.52B $68.38K
Gross profit $3.00M $512.52M -$59.76K
Operating income -$7.79M $194.40M -$3.17M
Net income $4.05M $99.72M -$3.07M
Free cash flow -$8.86M $9.87M -$2.06M
R&D $1.99M – $352.23K
EPS (diluted) $1.28 $2.43 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $5.01M $61.42M $1.56M
Total debt – $2.49B –
Shares (diluted) 3.17M 40.96M 452.72M
Enterprise value -$10.53M $1.22B $13.09M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCRDGL
P/E 4.8x 15.4x -7.4x
P/FCF -2.2x 155.7x -11.1x
P/Operating cash flow -2.2x 22.3x -11.1x
P/S 2.5x 1.0x 333.1x
P/B 1.3x 4.0x 13.7x
P/Tangible book 1.3x 4.3x 13.7x
EV/EBITDA -2.2x 8.1x –
EV/EBIT -1.9x 10.7x -6.7x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 1.4x 310.3x
EV/FCF -1.7x 209.9x -10.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x 30.0x -10.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.90 0.35 -5.99

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCRDGL
Revenue growth (1Y) -11.6% 17.1% 144.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -20.4% 15.8% 23.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -28.5% 28.1% -1,903%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -32.3% 19.8% -113.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 59.2% 76.0% -21.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -67.1% 39.3% -7.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 123.1% 106.6% -5.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 30.3% 45.2% -7.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 118.8% 105.2% 4.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.3% 44.6% 1.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 37.6% -13.9% -22.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -74.7% 73.0% -22.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 41.9% -76.4% -22.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -79.7% 31.2% -22.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCRDGL
Gross margin 38.0% 33.8% -87.4%
EBITDA margin -83.6% 16.8% –
Operating margin -98.8% 12.8% -4,629%
Pretax margin -87.2% 9.0% -4,484%
Net margin 51.4% 6.6% -4,484%
FCF margin -112.4% 0.6% -3,009%
Operating cash flow margin -111.2% 4.5% -3,009%
Return on equity 42.3% 26.7% -159.5%
Return on assets 20.1% 6.8% -147.3%
Return on invested capital – 14.2% –
Return on capital employed -42.2% 16.8% -161.2%
Asset turnover 0.4x 1.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.2x 0.7x 0.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.1% 1,505%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCRDGL
Debt / assets – 41.1% –
Debt / equity – 1.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.1x –
Debt / FCF – 62.5x –
Liabilities / assets 18.7% 74.3% 11.1%
Equity / assets 81.3% 25.7% 88.9%
Interest coverage -54.1x 4.2x –
Current ratio 5.6x 3.0x 14.0x
Quick ratio 4.2x 1.1x 13.4x
Cash ratio 3.0x 0.3x 13.2x
Altman Z-score 2.17 3.09 -4.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCSCIFPAHCRDGL
Dividend yield – 1.3% –
Net buyback yield – – -6.6%
Shareholder yield – 1.3% -6.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 19.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 197.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCSCIFPAHCRDGL
Forward P/E – 11.1xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $3.42FY2027 –
EPS growth, next FY – +6.2%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after – +9.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $1.53BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +0.6%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.2% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCSCIFPAHCRDGL
Held by institutions – 51.5% –
Institutions holding – 208 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.1% –
Institutions buying – 117 –
Institutions selling – 73 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.60 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CSCIFPAHCRDGL
CSCIF 1.00 -0.01 -0.06
PAHC -0.01 1.00 0.07
RDGL -0.06 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CSCIF, PAHC and RDGL?

Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) is the largest by market capitalisation: COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) $19.64M, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) $1.54B, Vivos (RDGL) $22.77M.

Which stock is cheaper, CSCIF, PAHC and RDGL?

COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 4.8x, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 15.4x, Vivos (RDGL) -7.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Vivos (RDGL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) -11.6%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +17.1%, Vivos (RDGL) +144.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) has the highest net margin (COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 51.4%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 6.6%, Vivos (RDGL) -4,483.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) returned the most: COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) +140.1%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) -9.1%, Vivos (RDGL) -37.5%. Over five years, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) compounded fastest (COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) -36.4%/yr, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) +11.5%/yr, Vivos (RDGL) -13.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 1.27%. COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) and Vivos (RDGL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) has been the steadiest (COSCIENS Biopharma (CSCIF) 209.7%, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) 55.5%, Vivos (RDGL) 122.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CSCIF, PAHC and RDGL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Phibro Animal Health (PAHC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.