CRWV vs FIS vs GTLB Stock Comparison

CoreWeave, Fidelity National Information Services and Gitlab Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.
$43.66 -52.4% 1M -61.8% 1Y
Market cap
$25.57B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.59B
Div. yield
–
Cloud Platforms Technology
3 wins
GTLB Gitlab Inc.
$48.99 -5.1% 1M +6.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.10B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Fidelity National Information Services leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fidelity National Information Services 5, CoreWeave 3, Gitlab 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRWVFISGTLBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.57B $14.79B $8.10B CRWV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -13.3x 4.3x -153.7x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 4.6x 54.4x FIS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +115.3% +23.6% +23.0% CRWV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -25.4% 26.8% -5.0% FIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.2% 4.3% — FIS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 4.4x — CRWV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.06% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -61.8% -54.6% +6.9% GTLB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -23.7%/yr -16.9%/yr GTLB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 97.8% 43.8% 59.4% FIS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 48/100 68/100 68/100 FIS

Percentile Scorecard

CRWVFISGTLB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRWVFISGTLB
Valuation 65 #14 of 38 95 #6 of 100 55 #57 of 124
Growth 57 #16 of 36 85 #16 of 99 83 #20 of 114
Profitability 52 #17 of 34 64 #35 of 96 61 #44 of 111
Financial Health 38 #24 of 38 19 #91 of 112 69 #41 of 128
Shareholder Returns 26 #15 of 20 76 #17 of 67 71 #22 of 74
Overall 48 68 68
  • CRWV ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • FIS ranked among 113 companies in Business Applications
  • GTLB ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRWVFISGTLBSPY
1 month -52.4%-12.1%-5.1% -5.9%
3 months -48.8%-31.4%+37.3% -4.6%
6 months -66.1%-37.8%+89.0% +0.2%
Year to date -39.0%-55.8%+30.5% +7.5%
1 year -61.8%-54.6%+6.9% +8.2%
3 years —-43.2%+18.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year —-17.2%+5.7% +19.0%
5 years —-74.2%-60.3% +56.5%
5 years, per year —-23.7%-16.9% +9.4%
10 years —-61.0%— +251.5%
10 years, per year —-9.0%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureCRWVFISGTLBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 97.8%43.8%59.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 94.8%51.9%60.0% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.40-0.010.96 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.63-1.250.12 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.2%-75.9%-85.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -68.4%-56.5%-15.5% -5.9%
52-week high $137.98$67.54$57.97 $779.14
52-week low $43.66$29.38$19.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRWVFISGTLB
P/E now vs peer median -12.5xmedian 27.4x 4.4xmedian 24.7x -156.9xmedian 39.4x
P/S now vs peer median 3.2xmedian 3.3x 1.2xmedian 2.8x 7.7xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 21.2x 7.7xmedian 16.5x -260.6xmedian 34.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.8xmedian 15.9x 5.4xmedian 15.3x 38.1xmedian 22.7x
P/B now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 2.6x 0.9xmedian 2.7x 8.4xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.22 0.15median 0.77 -4.25median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRWVFISGTLB
Revenue $7.59B $12.94B $1.06B
Gross profit $5.12B $4.64B $904.84M
Operating income -$230.74M $2.12B -$90.20M
Net income -$1.93B $3.47B -$54.73M
Free cash flow -$13.66B $2.78B $213.67M
R&D – – $304.14M
EPS (diluted) $-3.50 $6.70 $-0.31
Cash & equivalents $5.52B $740.00M $226.49M
Total debt $3.66B $20.77B –
Shares (diluted) 551.00M 517.00M 168.70M
Enterprise value $12.66B $11.96B $3.02B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRWVFISGTLB
P/E -12.5x 4.4x -156.9x
P/FCF -1.8x 5.4x 38.1x
P/Operating cash flow 3.5x 5.1x 36.5x
P/S 3.2x 1.2x 7.7x
P/B 4.8x 0.9x 8.4x
P/Tangible book 5.0x 1.3x 8.4x
EV/EBITDA 5.7x 7.7x -260.6x
EV/EBIT -96.1x 16.6x -76.3x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 2.7x 6.5x
EV/FCF -1.6x 12.7x 32.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 3.2x 12.0x 30.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.15 -4.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRWVFISGTLB
Revenue growth (1Y) 115.3% 23.6% 23.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 9.5% 28.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 94.9% 20.9% 19.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 8.4% 26.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -204.2% 24.2% 10.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% 25.2%
Net income growth (1Y) -89.8% 2,137% -405.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 28.9% 34.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -50.8% 2,205% -470.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 29.3% 36.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 983.6% 11.7% 433.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 186.5% 310.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -72.1% 12.1% 496.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 374.6% 1,057%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRWVFISGTLB
Gross margin 67.4% 35.8% 85.8%
EBITDA margin 51.2% 35.5% -2.5%
Operating margin -3.0% 16.4% -8.5%
Pretax margin -25.3% 11.1% -4.7%
Net margin -25.4% 26.8% -5.0%
FCF margin -179.9% 21.5% 20.3%
Operating cash flow margin 91.1% 22.7% 21.2%
Return on equity -39.4% 21.5% -5.4%
Return on assets -2.9% 7.9% -3.2%
Return on invested capital -1.2% 4.3% –
Return on capital employed -0.5% 6.2% -8.8%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.3x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -3.6x 0.8x -4.1x
Stock comp / revenue 8.2% 1.5% 21.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRWVFISGTLB
Debt / assets 4.8% 47.5% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 1.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.5x 4.4x –
Debt / FCF -0.3x 7.5x –
Liabilities / assets 93.5% 62.9% 41.5%
Equity / assets 6.5% 37.1% 58.5%
Interest coverage – 3.0x –
Current ratio 0.5x 0.5x 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.4x 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.1x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 0.04 0.01 7.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRWVFISGTLB
Dividend yield – 5.9% –
Net buyback yield -12.5% 2.9% 1.5%
Shareholder yield -12.5% 8.7% 1.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 25.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 32.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 7.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRWVFISGTLB
Forward P/E – 4.6xFY2026 54.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.88FY2026 $6.37FY2026 $0.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +10.8%FY2026 -6.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +6.8% +21.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $13.22BFY2026 $12.98BFY2026 $1.08BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +157.7%FY2026 +21.5%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +113.8% +4.6% +16.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRWVFISGTLB
Held by institutions 87.2% 98.7% 95.7%
Institutions holding 964 858 398
Change in shares held, QoQ +27.1% +3.5% +4.9%
Institutions buying 691 414 231
Institutions selling 172 334 123
Buyers to sellers 4.02 1.24 1.88

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRWVFISGTLB
CRWV 1.00 -0.05 0.07
FIS -0.05 1.00 0.27
GTLB 0.07 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRWV, FIS and GTLB?

CoreWeave (CRWV) is the largest by market capitalisation: CoreWeave (CRWV) $25.57B, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) $14.79B, Gitlab (GTLB) $8.10B.

Which company is growing faster?

CoreWeave (CRWV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CoreWeave (CRWV) +115.3%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) +23.6%, Gitlab (GTLB) +23.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has the highest net margin (CoreWeave (CRWV) -25.4%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 26.8%, Gitlab (GTLB) -5.0%). On return on invested capital, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads (CoreWeave (CRWV) -1.2%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gitlab (GTLB) returned the most: CoreWeave (CRWV) -61.8%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -54.6%, Gitlab (GTLB) +6.9%. Over five years, Gitlab (GTLB) compounded fastest (Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) -23.7%/yr, Gitlab (GTLB) -16.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: CoreWeave (CRWV) 0.00%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 0.06%, Gitlab (GTLB) 0.00%. CoreWeave (CRWV) and Gitlab (GTLB) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) has been the steadiest (CoreWeave (CRWV) 97.8%, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) 43.8%, Gitlab (GTLB) 59.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRWV, FIS and GTLB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fidelity National Information Services (FIS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.