CRWD vs GEN vs FTNT Stock Comparison

CrowdStrike Holdings, Gen Digital and Fortinet Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GEN Gen Digital Inc.
$24.25 +12.2% 1M -9.6% 1Y
Market cap
$14.53B
P/E
13.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.08B
Div. yield
2.10%
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$185.00 +6.7% 1M +116.9% 1Y
Market cap
$135.72B
P/E
64.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.53B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Gen Digital leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Gen Digital 4, Fortinet 4, CrowdStrike Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRWDGENFTNTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $274.44B $14.53B $135.72B CRWD
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4,674x 13.8x 64.0x GEN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 201.5x 7.9x 51.7x GEN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.3% +20.2% +18.8% CRWD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 1.1% 20.7% 28.2% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.1% 13.4% 111.7% FTNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x 2.9x -1.2x CRWD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.10% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -49.4% -9.6% +116.9% FTNT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.0%/yr -1.4%/yr +23.1%/yr FTNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 150.5% 40.3% 42.7% GEN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 71/100 69/100 GEN

Percentile Scorecard

CRWDGENFTNT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRWDGENFTNT
Valuation 21 #98 of 124 89 #15 of 124 49 #64 of 124
Growth 88 #15 of 113 61 #45 of 113 64 #41 of 113
Profitability 68 #36 of 109 95 #6 of 109 100 #1 of 109
Financial Health 61 #50 of 127 15 #108 of 127 54 #59 of 127
Shareholder Returns 56 #29 of 65 94 #5 of 65 77 #16 of 65
Overall 59 71 69
  • CRWD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GEN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRWDGENFTNTSPY
1 month +6.3%+12.2%+6.7% -0.2%
3 months +47.4%-12.1%+23.3% +3.9%
6 months -41.1%+26.0%+115.8% +8.2%
Year to date -42.8%-10.8%+133.0% +12.9%
1 year -49.4%-9.6%+116.9% +12.3%
3 years +55.1%+46.9%+228.8% +87.4%
3 years, per year +15.8%+13.7%+48.7% +23.3%
5 years -4.7%-6.7%+182.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -1.0%-1.4%+23.1% +10.9%
10 years —-2.7%+2,993.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-0.3%+41.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCRWDGENFTNTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 150.5%40.3%42.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 209.2%40.9%37.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.700.840.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.33-0.242.74 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.1%-49.7%-38.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -65.7%-22.8%-5.0% -1.2%
52-week high $782.17$31.41$194.75 $779.14
52-week low $179.38$17.89$75.23 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRWDGENFTNT
P/E now vs peer median 4,674xmedian 38.6x 13.8xmedian 38.6x 64.0xmedian 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 50.9xmedian 4.4x 2.9xmedian 4.4x 18.0xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 409.6xmedian 34.5x 8.5xmedian 34.5x 44.5xmedian 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 170.6xmedian 29.4x 9.4xmedian 29.4x 43.5xmedian 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 53.4xmedian 3.3x 5.5xmedian 3.3x 87.5xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 125.80median 1.28 -2.62median 1.28 2.20median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRWDGENFTNT
Revenue $5.40B $5.08B $7.53B
Gross profit $4.06B $3.96B $6.04B
Operating income -$119.49M $2.12B $2.44B
Net income $77.40M $1.05B $2.12B
Free cash flow $1.61B $1.55B $3.12B
R&D $1.56B $418.00M $846.40M
EPS (diluted) $0.06 $1.75 $2.87
Cash & equivalents $5.01B $564.00M $2.93B
Total debt $2.98B $8.16B $2.99B
Shares (diluted) 1.04B 603.00M 739.90M
Enterprise value $254.87B $12.23B $121.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRWDGENFTNT
P/E 4,674x 13.8x 64.0x
P/FCF 170.6x 9.4x 43.5x
P/Operating cash flow 136.1x 9.3x 40.0x
P/S 50.9x 2.9x 18.0x
P/B 53.4x 5.5x 87.5x
P/Tangible book 56.4x 23.8x 92.1x
EV/EBITDA 409.6x 8.5x 44.5x
EV/EBIT -2,261x 10.4x 54.1x
EV/Revenue 50.1x 4.4x 17.6x
EV/FCF 167.9x 14.3x 42.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 134.0x 14.1x 38.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 125.80 -2.62 2.20

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRWDGENFTNT
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.3% 20.2% 18.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 26.9% 12.6% 14.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 26.2% 17.4% 17.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 27.6% 11.1% 16.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 66.9% 29.2% 24.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 17.5% 27.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 127.3% 76.4% 9.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 41.4% -7.3% 26.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 120.0% 82.5% 14.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 37.2% -5.3% 29.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 45.2% 14.9% 41.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.8% 26.9% 15.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 45.4% 14.8% 53.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 24.1% 26.8% 16.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRWDGENFTNT
Gross margin 75.2% 78.0% 80.2%
EBITDA margin 12.2% 51.4% 39.4%
Operating margin -2.2% 41.7% 32.4%
Pretax margin 1.4% 30.2% 34.8%
Net margin 1.1% 20.7% 28.2%
FCF margin 29.8% 30.5% 41.4%
Operating cash flow margin 37.4% 30.9% 45.1%
Return on equity 1.6% 40.0% 166.9%
Return on assets 0.7% 6.7% 20.4%
Return on invested capital -2.1% 13.4% 111.7%
Return on capital employed -1.7% 16.4% 44.2%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 26.1x 1.5x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue 23.1% 4.4% 3.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRWDGENFTNT
Debt / assets 6.2% 52.1% 4.6%
Debt / equity 0.1x 3.1x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x 2.9x -1.2x
Debt / FCF 0.5x 5.3x 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 57.3% 83.0% 85.7%
Equity / assets 42.7% 17.0% 14.3%
Interest coverage -4.5x 3.9x 135.7x
Current ratio 1.6x 0.5x 1.3x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.3x 1.1x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.2x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 24.44 1.36 10.29

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRWDGENFTNT
Dividend yield – 2.1% –
Net buyback yield 0.0% 4.1% 2.1%
Shareholder yield 0.0% 6.2% 2.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRWDGENFTNT
Forward P/E 201.5xFY2026 7.9xFY2026 51.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.33FY2026 $3.07FY2026 $3.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +43.0%FY2026 +19.9%FY2026 +29.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.3% +10.4% +0.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.28BFY2026 $5.64BFY2026 $8.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +30.5%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026 +23.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +22.3% +8.2% +13.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRWDGENFTNT
Held by institutions 77.4% 89.1% 68.6%
Institutions holding 2,433 688 1,567
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.2% +3.8% +23.7%
Institutions buying 1,375 391 854
Institutions selling 837 211 549
Buyers to sellers 1.64 1.85 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRWDGENFTNT
CRWD 1.00 0.09 0.32
GEN 0.09 1.00 0.43
FTNT 0.32 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRWD, GEN and FTNT?

CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) is the largest by market capitalisation: CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) $274.44B, Gen Digital (GEN) $14.53B, Fortinet (FTNT) $135.72B.

Which stock is cheaper, CRWD, GEN and FTNT?

Gen Digital (GEN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 4,674x, Gen Digital (GEN) 13.8x, Fortinet (FTNT) 64.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gen Digital (GEN) is cheapest (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 201.5x, Gen Digital (GEN) 7.9x, Fortinet (FTNT) 51.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) +24.3%, Gen Digital (GEN) +20.2%, Fortinet (FTNT) +18.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 1.1%, Gen Digital (GEN) 20.7%, Fortinet (FTNT) 28.2%). On return on invested capital, Fortinet (FTNT) leads (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -2.1%, Gen Digital (GEN) 13.4%, Fortinet (FTNT) 111.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Fortinet (FTNT) returned the most: CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -49.4%, Gen Digital (GEN) -9.6%, Fortinet (FTNT) +116.9%. Over five years, Fortinet (FTNT) compounded fastest (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) -1.0%/yr, Gen Digital (GEN) -1.4%/yr, Fortinet (FTNT) +23.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Gen Digital (GEN) 2.10%. CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) and Fortinet (FTNT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gen Digital (GEN) has been the steadiest (CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) 150.5%, Gen Digital (GEN) 40.3%, Fortinet (FTNT) 42.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRWD, GEN and FTNT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gen Digital (GEN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.