CRS vs IPX vs MP Stock Comparison

Carpenter Technology, Iperionx and MP Materials Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IPX IPERIONX Ltd
$17.04 -6.9% 1M -62.3% 1Y
Market cap
$499.08M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
MP MP Materials Corp. / DE
$41.65 -8.3% 1M -35.2% 1Y
Market cap
$7.00B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$305.38M
Div. yield
–
Rare Earths Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Carpenter Technology leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Carpenter Technology 8, MP Materials 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRSIPXMPLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.05B $499.08M $7.00B CRS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.7x -8.6x -115.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.3x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.2% — +26.1% MP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.9% — -19.9% CRS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.8% — -2.9% CRS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x — 98.0x CRS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.7% -62.3% -35.2% CRS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +57.5%/yr — +4.2%/yr CRS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.2% 85.3% 70.1% CRS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 — 31/100 CRS

Percentile Scorecard

CRSIPXMP

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRSIPXMP
Valuation 50 #82 of 163 4 #157 of 163 27 #120 of 163
Growth 70 #45 of 148 – 22 #116 of 148
Profitability 72 #35 of 123 – 27 #90 of 123
Financial Health 41 #97 of 164 55 #74 of 164 49 #84 of 164
Shareholder Returns 75 #28 of 108 – –
Overall 62 – 31
  • CRS ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • IPX ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • MP ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRSIPXMPSPY
1 month -23.7%-6.9%-8.3% +0.7%
3 months -40.6%-20.9%0.0% +3.7%
6 months -30.3%-49.1%-36.9% +7.1%
Year to date -5.1%-52.9%-17.6% +12.8%
1 year -7.7%-62.3%-35.2% +11.9%
3 years +373.8%+115.2%+151.2% +85.2%
3 years, per year +68.0%+29.1%+36.0% +22.8%
5 years +867.1%—+23.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year +57.5%—+4.2% +10.9%
10 years +841.5%—— +262.0%
10 years, per year +25.1%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCRSIPXMPSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.2%85.3%70.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.4%91.7%68.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.623.592.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.16-0.73-0.50 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-79.3%-82.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -51.8%-71.7%-42.7% -1.2%
52-week high $619.28$60.11$72.65 $779.14
52-week low $280.03$12.44$37.45 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRSIPXMP
P/E now vs peer median 26.1xmedian 13.2x -8.6xmedian 13.2x -122.6xmedian 13.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 3.1x -362.8xmedian 3.1x 24.3xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 7.2x —median 7.2x -1,305xmedian 7.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 43.4xmedian 15.2x -9.0xmedian 15.2x -14.7xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 2.2x 6.5xmedian 2.2x 3.8xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.35median 0.30 —median 0.30 3.73median 0.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRSIPXMP
Revenue $3.19B – $305.38M
Gross profit $995.30M – $65.31M
Operating income $745.00M – -$126.87M
Net income $569.80M – -$60.62M
Free cash flow $340.80M – -$504.58M
EPS (diluted) $11.40 – $-0.34
Cash & equivalents $159.50M $35.24M $429.08M
Total debt $691.00M $32.45M $934.58M
Shares (diluted) 50.00M 33.57M 178.41M
Enterprise value $12.97B $266.07M $5.55B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRSIPXMP
P/E 26.1x -8.6x -122.6x
P/FCF 43.4x -9.0x -14.7x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x – -88.3x
P/S 4.6x -362.8x 24.3x
P/B 6.8x 6.5x 3.8x
P/Tangible book 6.8x 7.6x 3.8x
EV/EBITDA 17.2x – -1,305x
EV/EBIT 20.6x – -54.4x
EV/Revenue 4.8x – 22.6x
EV/FCF 45.0x – -13.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.8x – -82.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.35 – 3.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRSIPXMP
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.2% – 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.3% – -6.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.1% – 139.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 34.8% – -38.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 32.7% – 21.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 56.7% – -41.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 37.7% – 40.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 74.6% – -32.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.8% – 45.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 74.5% – -32.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 40.8% – -94.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.5% – -34.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 26.6% – -164.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 232.2% – -51.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRSIPXMP
Gross margin 31.2% – 21.4%
EBITDA margin 28.0% – -1.7%
Operating margin 23.4% – -41.5%
Pretax margin 22.1% – -29.8%
Net margin 17.9% – -19.9%
FCF margin 10.7% – -165.2%
Operating cash flow margin 19.4% – -27.5%
Return on equity 25.8% – -3.1%
Return on assets 15.0% – -1.6%
Return on invested capital 20.8% – -2.9%
Return on capital employed 22.4% – -3.5%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% – 13.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRSIPXMP
Debt / assets 18.5% 30.7% 25.1%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.4x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x – 98.0x
Debt / FCF 2.0x – -1.9x
Liabilities / assets 41.7% 16.5% 47.5%
Equity / assets 58.3% 83.5% 52.5%
Interest coverage – – -3.3x
Current ratio 3.9x 3.2x 9.5x
Quick ratio 1.9x 2.8x 8.4x
Cash ratio 0.3x 2.6x 7.9x
Altman Z-score 8.51 – 3.06

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRSIPXMP
Dividend yield 0.3% – –
Net buyback yield 1.7% – –
Shareholder yield 2.0% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRSIPXMP
Forward P/E 21.3xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $14.05FY2027 $-0.17FY2027 $-0.04FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.6%FY2027 – –
EPS growth, the year after +8.6% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.56BFY2027 $22.33MFY2027 $421.40MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.0%FY2027 – +87.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.4% +331.3% +76.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRSIPXMP
Held by institutions 93.3% 13.9% 82.4%
Institutions holding 876 59 756
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.9% +9.4% +11.3%
Institutions buying 548 46 417
Institutions selling 249 7 206
Buyers to sellers 2.20 6.57 2.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRSIPXMP
CRS 1.00 0.34 0.35
IPX 0.34 1.00 0.54
MP 0.35 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRS, IPX and MP?

Carpenter Technology (CRS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Carpenter Technology (CRS) $14.05B, Iperionx (IPX) $499.08M, MP Materials (MP) $7.00B.

Which company is growing faster?

MP Materials (MP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Carpenter Technology (CRS) +10.2%, MP Materials (MP) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Carpenter Technology (CRS) has the highest net margin (Carpenter Technology (CRS) 17.9%, MP Materials (MP) -19.9%). On return on invested capital, Carpenter Technology (CRS) leads (Carpenter Technology (CRS) 20.8%, MP Materials (MP) -2.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Carpenter Technology (CRS) returned the most: Carpenter Technology (CRS) -7.7%, Iperionx (IPX) -62.3%, MP Materials (MP) -35.2%. Over five years, Carpenter Technology (CRS) compounded fastest (Carpenter Technology (CRS) +57.5%/yr, MP Materials (MP) +4.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Carpenter Technology (CRS) has been the steadiest (Carpenter Technology (CRS) 49.2%, Iperionx (IPX) 85.3%, MP Materials (MP) 70.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRS, IPX and MP?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Carpenter Technology (CRS) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.