CRS vs ERO vs GSM Stock Comparison

Carpenter Technology, Ero Copper and Ferroglobe Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
ERO Ero Copper Corp.
$31.11 -16.3% 1M +45.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.24B
P/E
10.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.04B
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
7 wins
GSM Ferroglobe PLC
$4.01 +0.5% 1M -19.2% 1Y
Market cap
$749.31M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.37B
Div. yield
1.10%
Copper Basic Materials
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ero Copper leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Ero Copper 7, Carpenter Technology 3, Ferroglobe 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRSEROGSMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.79B $3.24B $749.31M CRS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.1x 10.3x -18.7x ERO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.3x 7.5x — ERO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.2% +94.9% -8.5% ERO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.9% 30.0% -3.0% ERO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 20.8% 22.0% -4.5% ERO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 0.9x -0.8x GSM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.27% — 1.10% GSM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -7.7% +45.1% -19.2% ERO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +57.5%/yr +10.8%/yr -9.6%/yr CRS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.2% 62.9% 58.6% CRS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 63/100 51/100 ERO

Percentile Scorecard

CRSEROGSM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRSEROGSM
Valuation 50 #82 of 163 58 #69 of 163 77 #38 of 163
Growth 70 #45 of 148 82 #28 of 148 18 #121 of 148
Profitability 72 #35 of 123 77 #29 of 123 39 #75 of 123
Financial Health 41 #97 of 164 29 #116 of 164 50 #82 of 164
Shareholder Returns 75 #28 of 108 70 #33 of 108 67 #36 of 108
Overall 62 63 51
  • CRS ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • ERO ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • GSM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRSEROGSMSPY
1 month -23.7%-16.3%+0.5% +0.7%
3 months -40.6%+15.0%+24.9% +3.7%
6 months -30.3%+20.3%-13.6% +7.1%
Year to date -5.1%+10.0%-13.6% +12.8%
1 year -7.7%+45.1%-19.2% +11.9%
3 years +373.8%+129.8%-9.7% +85.2%
3 years, per year +68.0%+32.0%-3.3% +22.8%
5 years +867.1%+66.7%-39.5% +67.6%
5 years, per year +57.5%+10.8%-9.6% +10.9%
10 years +841.5%—-56.4% +262.0%
10 years, per year +25.1%—-8.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCRSEROGSMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.2%62.9%58.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.4%63.9%58.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.622.431.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.160.72-0.33 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-59.8%-67.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -51.8%-23.0%-26.4% -1.2%
52-week high $619.28$40.40$5.45 $779.14
52-week low $280.03$19.89$3.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRSEROGSM
P/E now vs peer median 26.1xmedian 13.2x 10.3xmedian 13.2x -18.7xmedian 13.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 3.1x 3.1xmedian 3.1x 0.5xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.2xmedian 7.2x 7.0xmedian 7.2x 16.3xmedian 7.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 43.4xmedian 15.2x -12.1xmedian 15.2x 51.4xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 6.8xmedian 2.2x 2.7xmedian 2.2x 1.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.35median 0.30 0.20median 0.30 0.60median 0.30

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRSEROGSM
Revenue $3.19B $1.04B $1.37B
Gross profit $995.30M $449.15M –
Operating income $745.00M $379.69M -$37.28M
Net income $569.80M $315.31M -$45.85M
Free cash flow $340.80M -$268.65M $14.57M
EPS (diluted) $11.40 $3.01 $-0.21
Cash & equivalents $159.50M $101.74M $93.08M
Total debt $691.00M $2.38B $372.14M
Shares (diluted) 50.00M 104.13M 188.36M
Enterprise value $13.71B $2.88B $265.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRSEROGSM
P/E 26.1x 10.3x -18.7x
P/FCF 43.4x -12.1x 51.4x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x – 15.7x
P/S 4.6x 3.1x 0.5x
P/B 6.8x 2.7x 1.0x
P/Tangible book 6.8x 2.7x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 17.2x 7.0x 16.3x
EV/EBIT 20.6x 9.7x -19.2x
EV/Revenue 4.8x 3.5x 0.5x
EV/FCF 45.0x -13.8x 49.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.8x – 15.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.35 0.20 0.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRSEROGSM
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.2% 94.9% -8.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -5.3% 36.8% -10.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.1% 96.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 34.8% 42.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 32.7% 120.6% 33.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 56.7% 54.3% -28.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 37.7% 118.8% 48.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 74.6% 57.4% -31.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.8% 118.9% 53.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 74.5% 51.3% -31.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 40.8% – -38.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 83.5% – -47.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 26.6% 32.3% -62.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 232.2% -11.3% -62.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRSEROGSM
Gross margin 31.2% 43.0% –
EBITDA margin 28.0% 50.6% 3.2%
Operating margin 23.4% 36.3% -2.7%
Pretax margin 22.1% 37.2% -1.6%
Net margin 17.9% 30.0% -3.0%
FCF margin 10.7% -25.7% 1.1%
Operating cash flow margin 19.4% – 3.5%
Return on equity 25.8% 38.3% -6.6%
Return on assets 15.0% 21.0% -3.0%
Return on invested capital 20.8% 22.0% -4.5%
Return on capital employed 22.4% – -2.6%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x – -1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 1.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRSEROGSM
Debt / assets 18.5% 25.7% 3.9%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.5x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.6x 0.9x -0.8x
Debt / FCF 2.0x -2.1x 4.1x
Liabilities / assets 41.7% 43.7% 53.7%
Equity / assets 58.3% 56.3% 46.3%
Interest coverage – 8.2x -1.8x
Current ratio 3.9x – 5.9x
Quick ratio 1.9x – 3.1x
Cash ratio 0.3x – 0.7x
Altman Z-score 8.51 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRSEROGSM
Dividend yield 0.3% – 1.1%
Net buyback yield 1.7% -0.3% -0.6%
Shareholder yield 2.0% -0.3% 0.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRSEROGSM
Forward P/E 21.3xFY2027 7.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $14.05FY2027 $4.16FY2026 $-0.05FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +30.6%FY2027 +96.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +8.6% +20.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.56BFY2027 $1.24BFY2026 $1.43BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +14.0%FY2027 +57.4%FY2026 +6.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.4% +5.5% +32.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRSEROGSM
Held by institutions 93.3% 67.3% 55.9%
Institutions holding 876 209 174
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.9% +1.2% +1.6%
Institutions buying 548 125 94
Institutions selling 249 60 58
Buyers to sellers 2.20 2.08 1.62

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRSEROGSM
CRS 1.00 0.27 0.20
ERO 0.27 1.00 0.30
GSM 0.20 0.30 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRS, ERO and GSM?

Carpenter Technology (CRS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Carpenter Technology (CRS) $14.79B, Ero Copper (ERO) $3.24B, Ferroglobe (GSM) $749.31M.

Which stock is cheaper, CRS, ERO and GSM?

Ero Copper (ERO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Carpenter Technology (CRS) 26.1x, Ero Copper (ERO) 10.3x, Ferroglobe (GSM) -18.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ero Copper (ERO) is cheapest (Carpenter Technology (CRS) 21.3x, Ero Copper (ERO) 7.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ero Copper (ERO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Carpenter Technology (CRS) +10.2%, Ero Copper (ERO) +94.9%, Ferroglobe (GSM) -8.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ero Copper (ERO) has the highest net margin (Carpenter Technology (CRS) 17.9%, Ero Copper (ERO) 30.0%, Ferroglobe (GSM) -3.0%). On return on invested capital, Ero Copper (ERO) leads (Carpenter Technology (CRS) 20.8%, Ero Copper (ERO) 22.0%, Ferroglobe (GSM) -4.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ero Copper (ERO) returned the most: Carpenter Technology (CRS) -7.7%, Ero Copper (ERO) +45.1%, Ferroglobe (GSM) -19.2%. Over five years, Carpenter Technology (CRS) compounded fastest (Carpenter Technology (CRS) +57.5%/yr, Ero Copper (ERO) +10.8%/yr, Ferroglobe (GSM) -9.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ferroglobe (GSM) has the highest dividend yield: Carpenter Technology (CRS) 0.27%, Ferroglobe (GSM) 1.10%. Ero Copper (ERO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Carpenter Technology (CRS) has been the steadiest (Carpenter Technology (CRS) 49.2%, Ero Copper (ERO) 62.9%, Ferroglobe (GSM) 58.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRS, ERO and GSM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ero Copper (ERO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.