CRBG vs MET vs PUK Stock Comparison

Corebridge Financial, Metlife and Prudential Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MET Metlife Inc
$99.65 +4.0% 1M +26.5% 1Y
Market cap
$64.68B
P/E
18.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$79.40B
Div. yield
0.02%
Life Insurance Financial Services
5 wins
PUK Prudential Plc
$24.25 -3.8% 1M -14.1% 1Y
Market cap
$31.45B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Life Insurance Financial Services

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Corebridge Financial leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Corebridge Financial 6, Metlife 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCRBGMETPUKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.04B $64.68B $31.45B MET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.0x 18.8x — CRBG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.3x 10.1x 10.8x CRBG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +29.5% +8.7% — CRBG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 4.4% 4.3% — CRBG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.0% -101.9% — CRBG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.02% 0.00% CRBG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.1% +26.5% -14.1% MET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +9.7%/yr -10.1%/yr MET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.1% 23.9% 29.0% MET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 31/100 39/100 — MET

Percentile Scorecard

CRBGMETPUK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCRBGMETPUK
Valuation 52 #58 of 119 59 #50 of 119 –
Growth 39 #69 of 113 21 #90 of 113 –
Profitability 18 #88 of 107 17 #89 of 107 –
Financial Health 6 #101 of 107 56 #48 of 107 69 #34 of 107
Shareholder Returns 39 #65 of 105 44 #59 of 105 43 #60 of 105
Overall 31 39 –
  • CRBG ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • MET ranked among 126 companies in Insurance
  • PUK ranked among 126 companies in Insurance

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCRBGMETPUKSPY
1 month +4.5%+4.0%-3.8% +0.9%
3 months +11.2%+2.7%-17.1% +5.9%
6 months +31.0%+26.2%-18.9% +8.5%
Year to date +17.0%+26.2%-22.1% +13.3%
1 year +11.1%+26.5%-14.1% +12.4%
3 years +77.2%+71.0%+19.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +21.0%+19.6%+6.1% +23.5%
5 years —+58.7%-41.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+9.7%-10.1% +11.0%
10 years —+138.0%-24.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year —+9.1%-2.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCRBGMETPUKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.1%23.9%29.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.3%24.2%30.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.340.641.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.321.11-0.49 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.0%-36.2%-65.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.8%-3.8%-27.8% -0.9%
52-week high $35.58$103.55$33.61 $779.14
52-week low $22.30$67.70$23.53 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCRBGMETPUK
P/E now vs peer median 18.0xmedian 10.9x 18.6xmedian 10.9x —median 10.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.4x 0.8xmedian 1.4x —median 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 7.5x —median 7.5x —median 7.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 8.5xmedian 8.5x 4.3xmedian 8.5x —median 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.5x 2.3xmedian 1.5x 1.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -0.89median 0.59 1.77median 0.59 —median 0.59

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCRBGMETPUK
Revenue $20.06B $79.40B –
Gross profit $12.23B $29.06B –
Operating income $1.61B -$45.48B –
Net income $883.00M $3.66B –
Free cash flow $1.85B $14.81B –
EPS (diluted) $1.96 $5.32 –
Cash & equivalents – $19.30B $5.89B
Total debt $9.36B $5.89B $16.00M
Shares (diluted) 454.20M 646.90M 1.30B
Enterprise value -$5.73B -$42.10B -$722.06B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCRBGMETPUK
P/E 18.0x 18.6x –
P/FCF 8.5x 4.3x –
P/Operating cash flow 8.5x 4.1x –
P/S 0.8x 0.8x –
P/B 1.4x 2.3x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 2.3x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA 8.5x – –
EV/EBIT 12.3x -0.9x –
EV/Revenue 1.0x 0.5x –
EV/FCF 10.7x 2.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 10.7x 2.7x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.89 1.77 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCRBGMETPUK
Revenue growth (1Y) 29.5% 8.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.0% 4.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 19.0% 6.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.0% 10.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 279.0% -13.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -40.9% -0.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 353.7% -14.9% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -30.9% 4.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 419.6% -12.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -20.2% 10.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.4% 2.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.3% 10.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 10.4% 2.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -20.3% 12.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCRBGMETPUK
Gross margin 61.0% 36.6% –
EBITDA margin 11.6% – –
Operating margin 8.0% -57.3% –
Pretax margin 5.4% 6.1% –
Net margin 4.4% 4.3% –
FCF margin 9.2% 18.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 9.2% 19.6% –
Return on equity 7.6% 13.2% –
Return on assets 0.2% 0.5% –
Return on invested capital 6.0% -101.9% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 4.3x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCRBGMETPUK
Debt / assets 2.3% 0.8% 0.0%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.2x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – –
Debt / FCF 5.1x 0.4x –
Liabilities / assets 97.3% 96.3% 90.8%
Equity / assets 2.7% 3.7% 9.2%
Interest coverage 3.0x -4.7x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCRBGMETPUK
Dividend yield 2.8% 2.3% 2.3%
Net buyback yield 19.3% 3.8% –
Shareholder yield 22.1% 6.2% 2.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 53.6% 41.2% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 25.5% 10.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -10.1% -0.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -22.0% -1.6% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCRBGMETPUK
Forward P/E 7.3xFY2026 10.1xFY2026 10.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.84FY2026 $9.86FY2026 $2.25FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +9.5%FY2026 +11.7%FY2026 +10.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +23.6% +7.9% +20.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.26BFY2026 $83.11BFY2026 $8.28BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.0%FY2026 +7.8%FY2026 +112.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +8.2% -2.6% +13.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCRBGMETPUK
Held by institutions 100.0% 75.7% 2.9%
Institutions holding 446 1,442 282
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.0% +0.7% +1.8%
Institutions buying 229 723 152
Institutions selling 170 483 96
Buyers to sellers 1.35 1.50 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CRBGMETPUK
CRBG 1.00 0.67 0.34
MET 0.67 1.00 0.36
PUK 0.34 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CRBG, MET and PUK?

Metlife (MET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) $16.04B, Metlife (MET) $64.68B, Prudential (PUK) $31.45B.

Which stock is cheaper, CRBG, MET and PUK?

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Corebridge Financial (CRBG) 18.0x, Metlife (MET) 18.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Corebridge Financial (CRBG) is cheapest (Corebridge Financial (CRBG) 7.3x, Metlife (MET) 10.1x, Prudential (PUK) 10.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) +29.5%, Metlife (MET) +8.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) has the highest net margin (Corebridge Financial (CRBG) 4.4%, Metlife (MET) 4.3%). On return on invested capital, Corebridge Financial (CRBG) leads (Corebridge Financial (CRBG) 6.0%, Metlife (MET) -101.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Metlife (MET) returned the most: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) +11.1%, Metlife (MET) +26.5%, Prudential (PUK) -14.1%. Over five years, Metlife (MET) compounded fastest (Metlife (MET) +9.7%/yr, Prudential (PUK) -10.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) has the highest dividend yield: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) 0.03%, Metlife (MET) 0.02%, Prudential (PUK) 0.00%. Prudential (PUK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Metlife (MET) has been the steadiest (Corebridge Financial (CRBG) 35.1%, Metlife (MET) 23.9%, Prudential (PUK) 29.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CRBG, MET and PUK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Corebridge Financial (CRBG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.