CPRT vs CYRX vs TLSS Stock Comparison

Copart, Cryoport and Transportation & Logistics Systems Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CPRT Copart Inc
$28.92 +4.8% 1M -34.5% 1Y
Market cap
$26.79B
P/E
18.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.67B
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
5 wins
CYRX Cryoport, Inc.
$18.41 +5.7% 1M +77.0% 1Y
Market cap
$932.44M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$186.45M
Div. yield
–
Logistics Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Copart leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Copart 5, Transportation & Logistics Systems 2, Cryoport 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCPRTCYRXTLSSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $26.79B $932.44M $1.18B CPRT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.5x -20.5x 921.6x CPRT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.4x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.4% +12.1% — CYRX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 31.8% -24.3% — CPRT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -5.8% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 16.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.5% +77.0% +1,900.0% TLSS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.4%/yr -25.5%/yr +58.5%/yr TLSS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.8% 48.4% — CPRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 30/100 32/100 CPRT

Percentile Scorecard

CPRTCYRXTLSS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCPRTCYRXTLSS
Valuation 27 #100 of 136 4 #130 of 136 3 #132 of 136
Growth 48 #63 of 121 53 #57 of 121 93 #9 of 121
Profitability 75 #29 of 115 10 #104 of 115 –
Financial Health 94 #9 of 143 64 #52 of 143 0 #143 of 143
Shareholder Returns 86 #12 of 82 20 #66 of 82 –
Overall 66 30 32
  • CPRT ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • CYRX ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • TLSS ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCPRTCYRXTLSSSPY
1 month +4.8%+5.7%+1,900.0% -0.2%
3 months -5.8%+21.4%+1,900.0% +3.9%
6 months -13.3%+82.3%+1,900.0% +8.2%
Year to date -26.1%+91.8%+1,900.0% +12.9%
1 year -34.5%+77.0%+1,900.0% +12.3%
3 years -32.3%+100.8%+1,900.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -12.2%+26.2%+171.6% +23.3%
5 years -24.3%-77.0%+900.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -5.4%-25.5%+58.5% +10.9%
10 years +347.1%+752.3%-97.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +16.2%+23.9%-31.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCPRTCYRXTLSSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.8%48.4%— 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 33.3%45.3%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.071.57— 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.051.59— 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -58.9%-94.4%-92.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.5%-0.6%-75.0% -1.2%
52-week high $44.16$18.53$0.80 $779.14
52-week low $26.27$7.72$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCPRTCYRXTLSS
P/E now vs peer median 18.5xmedian 16.3x -20.5xmedian 16.3x 921.6xmedian 16.3x
P/S now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 1.0x 5.0xmedian 1.0x —median 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.2xmedian 8.7x -57.0xmedian 8.7x —median 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.1xmedian 11.4x -46.5xmedian 11.4x —median 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.2x 1.9xmedian 1.2x -55.3xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.80median 0.82 -9.83median 0.82 33.33median 0.82

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCPRTCYRXTLSS
Revenue $4.67B $186.45M –
Gross profit $2.70B $87.77M –
Operating income $1.65B -$39.62M -$1.30M
Net income $1.48B -$37.39M $211.13K
Free cash flow $1.27B -$20.03M –
R&D – $17.75M –
EPS (diluted) $1.55 $-0.90 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $1.91B $269.27M $29.08K
Total debt – $186.83M $175.00K
Shares (diluted) 956.86M 50.44M 5.89B
Enterprise value $11.21B -$700.41M $1.18B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCPRTCYRXTLSS
P/E 18.5x -20.5x 921.6x
P/FCF 21.1x -46.5x –
P/Operating cash flow 16.7x 116.9x –
P/S 5.7x 5.0x –
P/B 2.9x 1.9x -55.3x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 2.6x -55.3x
EV/EBITDA 13.2x -57.0x –
EV/EBIT 15.1x -18.2x -904.0x
EV/Revenue 5.3x 3.9x –
EV/FCF 19.6x -36.1x –
EV/Operating cash flow 15.5x 90.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.80 -9.83 33.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCPRTCYRXTLSS
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.4% 12.1% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.4% -8.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -0.1% 14.1% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.7% -5.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -2.6% 7.8% 14.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 5.7% 28.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -4.4% -147.3% 128.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.1% 1.1% 26.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.3% -163.7% 514.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 6.6% 2.1% 27.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -10.8% 147.7% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.6% 33.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3.0% 40.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 14.3% 10.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCPRTCYRXTLSS
Gross margin 57.9% 47.1% –
EBITDA margin 40.5% -6.8% –
Operating margin 35.4% -21.2% –
Pretax margin 39.3% -16.6% –
Net margin 31.8% -24.3% –
FCF margin 27.2% -10.7% –
Operating cash flow margin 34.4% 4.3% –
Return on equity 16.6% -7.6% –
Return on assets 15.0% -4.9% 881.2%
Return on invested capital – -5.8% –
Return on capital employed 18.1% -7.4% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -0.2x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 5.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCPRTCYRXTLSS
Debt / assets – 24.7% 572.2%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – 16.6x –
Debt / FCF – -9.3x –
Liabilities / assets 9.3% 35.1% 69,686%
Equity / assets 90.7% 64.9% -69,586%
Interest coverage – -18.8x -18.2x
Current ratio 7.9x 2.1x 0.0x
Quick ratio 3.9x 2.0x 0.0x
Cash ratio 2.7x 1.8x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 19.98 1.25 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCPRTCYRXTLSS
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 5.2% 0.4% –
Shareholder yield 5.2% 0.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCPRTCYRXTLSS
Forward P/E 17.4xFY2027 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.66FY2027 $-0.77FY2026 $0.00FY2023
EPS growth, next FY +7.1%FY2027 -155.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +3.0% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.64BFY2027 $201.00MFY2026 $31.69MFY2023
Revenue growth, next FY -0.6%FY2027 +14.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +12.8% +0.4% +288.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCPRTCYRXTLSS
Held by institutions 83.8% 89.0% –
Institutions holding 1,058 184 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.7% -1.6% –
Institutions buying 529 102 –
Institutions selling 396 49 –
Buyers to sellers 1.34 2.08 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CPRTCYRXTLSS
CPRT 1.00 0.09 –
CYRX 0.09 1.00 –
TLSS – – –

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CPRT, CYRX and TLSS?

Copart (CPRT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Copart (CPRT) $26.79B, Cryoport (CYRX) $932.44M, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) $1.18B.

Which stock is cheaper, CPRT, CYRX and TLSS?

Copart (CPRT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Copart (CPRT) 18.5x, Cryoport (CYRX) -20.5x, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) 921.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cryoport (CYRX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Copart (CPRT) +0.4%, Cryoport (CYRX) +12.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Copart (CPRT) has the highest net margin (Copart (CPRT) 31.8%, Cryoport (CYRX) -24.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) returned the most: Copart (CPRT) -34.5%, Cryoport (CYRX) +77.0%, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +1,900.0%. Over five years, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) compounded fastest (Copart (CPRT) -5.4%/yr, Cryoport (CYRX) -25.5%/yr, Transportation & Logistics Systems (TLSS) +58.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Copart (CPRT) has been the steadiest (Copart (CPRT) 32.8%, Cryoport (CYRX) 48.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CPRT, CYRX and TLSS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Copart (CPRT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.