CPPTL vs MAC vs KRG Stock Comparison

Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust, Macerich and Kite Realty Group Trust Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
MAC Macerich Co
$24.38 +7.6% 1M +35.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.61B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.01B
Div. yield
0.03%
Retail REITs Real Estate
4 wins
KRG Kite Realty Group Trust
$24.67 -0.5% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$5.00B
P/E
14.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$806.16M
Div. yield
0.05%
Retail REITs Real Estate
4 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Macerich leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Macerich 4, Kite Realty Group Trust 4, Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCPPTLMACKRGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $750.00M $6.61B $5.00B MAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.5x -39.0x 14.8x KRG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 28.4x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +1.3% -5.6% MAC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -16.8% 41.8% KRG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -6.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -31.9x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.03% 0.05% KRG
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -17.1% +35.3% +7.7% MAC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +6.4%/yr +3.8%/yr MAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 13.1% 29.6% 17.9% CPPTL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 15/100 66/100 KRG

Percentile Scorecard

CPPTLMACKRG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCPPTLMACKRG
Valuation 97 #6 of 145 1 #143 of 145 63 #55 of 145
Growth 9 #130 of 142 32 #97 of 142 53 #67 of 142
Profitability – 9 #124 of 136 81 #27 of 136
Financial Health – 22 #109 of 139 46 #76 of 139
Shareholder Returns – 9 #119 of 131 89 #15 of 131
Overall – 15 66
  • CPPTL ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • MAC ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • KRG ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCPPTLMACKRGSPY
1 month -2.9%+7.6%-0.5% -0.8%
3 months -4.7%-6.7%-16.4% +3.5%
6 months -6.5%+12.9%-5.5% +7.0%
Year to date -10.2%+32.1%+2.9% +12.2%
1 year -17.1%+35.3%+7.7% +13.0%
3 years -2.7%+151.1%+24.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year -0.9%+35.9%+7.4% +23.1%
5 years —+36.3%+20.6% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+6.4%+3.8% +11.0%
10 years —-67.4%-3.6% +258.0%
10 years, per year —-10.6%-0.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCPPTLMACKRGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 13.1%29.6%17.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 15.6%32.1%18.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.000.63-0.01 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.311.190.43 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -36.5%-65.2%-29.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.1%-8.1%-17.3% -1.8%
52-week high $12.19$26.52$29.82 $779.14
52-week low $10.00$16.20$21.90 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCPPTLMACKRG
P/E now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 27.4x -39.4xmedian 27.4x 14.8xmedian 27.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 4.2x 6.9xmedian 4.2x 6.1xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.2x -79.7xmedian 14.2x —median 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.2xmedian 23.2x -37.2xmedian 23.2x 42.2xmedian 23.2x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.3x 2.4xmedian 1.3x 1.7xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.85median 2.11 2.58median 2.11 0.11median 2.11

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCPPTLMACKRG
Revenue – $1.01B $806.16M
Gross profit – $595.32M –
Operating income – -$522.95M –
Net income $34.92M -$172.33M $345.59M
Free cash flow $74.40M -$186.19M $117.09M
EPS (diluted) $0.47 $-0.62 $1.66
Cash & equivalents $34.95M $227.03M $144.58M
Total debt – $4.85B $2.84B
Shares (diluted) 75.00M 273.72M 203.20M
Enterprise value $595.04M $5.63B $4.71B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCPPTLMACKRG
P/E 21.7x -39.4x 14.8x
P/FCF 10.2x -37.2x 42.2x
P/Operating cash flow 10.2x 22.6x 12.4x
P/S – 6.9x 6.1x
P/B 0.8x 2.4x 1.7x
P/Tangible book 1.0x 2.4x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA – -79.7x –
EV/EBIT – -22.1x –
EV/Revenue – 11.5x 9.5x
EV/FCF 9.7x -62.0x 65.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.7x 37.6x 19.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.85 2.58 0.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCPPTLMACKRG
Revenue growth (1Y) – 1.3% -5.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 5.1% -0.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 2.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.4% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – -5.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -8.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) -54.3% 59.4% 96.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -25.5% -25.9% 130.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -54.3% 61.8% 111.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -25.5% -15.2% 134.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -15.8% -2.3% -7.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.1% -5.3% -0.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -15.8% 26.6% -30.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.1% -46.2% -16.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCPPTLMACKRG
Gross margin – 59.2% –
EBITDA margin – -14.4% –
Operating margin – -52.0% –
Pretax margin – -52.0% –
Net margin – -16.8% 41.8%
FCF margin – -18.5% 14.5%
Operating cash flow margin – 30.5% 49.5%
Return on equity – -6.4% 12.1%
Return on assets – -2.1% 5.5%
Return on invested capital – -6.9% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.1x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x -1.8x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.2% 1.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCPPTLMACKRG
Debt / assets – 56.9% 45.4%
Debt / equity – 1.7x 1.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – -31.9x –
Debt / FCF – -26.0x 24.3x
Liabilities / assets 11.0% 65.9% 54.2%
Equity / assets 89.0% 34.1% 45.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCPPTLMACKRG
Dividend yield – 2.8% 5.3%
Net buyback yield – -8.5% 9.1%
Shareholder yield – -5.7% 14.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -111.9% 77.2%
Payout ratio (FCF) – -103.6% 227.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 8.8% 15.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 0.4% 10.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCPPTLMACKRG
Forward P/E – – 28.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $-0.17FY2026 $0.87FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -36.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -50.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $969.19MFY2026 $750.31MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -4.0%FY2026 -9.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +13.7% +12.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCPPTLMACKRG
Held by institutions 0.4% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2 350 397
Change in shares held, QoQ – +19.5% -2.3%
Institutions buying 1 220 178
Institutions selling 1 79 145
Buyers to sellers 1.00 2.78 1.23

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CPPTLMACKRG
CPPTL 1.00 -0.08 -0.08
MAC -0.08 1.00 0.54
KRG -0.08 0.54 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CPPTL, MAC and KRG?

Macerich (MAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust (CPPTL) $750.00M, Macerich (MAC) $6.61B, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) $5.00B.

Which stock is cheaper, CPPTL, MAC and KRG?

Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust (CPPTL) 21.5x, Macerich (MAC) -39.0x, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 14.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Macerich (MAC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Macerich (MAC) +1.3%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) -5.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) has the highest net margin (Macerich (MAC) -16.8%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 41.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Macerich (MAC) returned the most: Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust (CPPTL) -17.1%, Macerich (MAC) +35.3%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) +7.7%. Over five years, Macerich (MAC) compounded fastest (Macerich (MAC) +6.4%/yr, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) +3.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) has the highest dividend yield: Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust (CPPTL) 0.00%, Macerich (MAC) 0.03%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 0.05%. Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust (CPPTL) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust (CPPTL) has been the steadiest (Copper Property CTL Pass Through Trust (CPPTL) 13.1%, Macerich (MAC) 29.6%, Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) 17.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CPPTL, MAC and KRG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Macerich (MAC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.