CPK vs ET vs FGPR Stock Comparison

Chesapeake Utilities, Energy Transfer and Ferrellgas Partners L P Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CPK Chesapeake Utilities Corp
$134.97 +4.8% 1M +2.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.25B
P/E
21.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$993.50M
Div. yield
0.02%
Regulated Electric Utilities Utilities
2 wins
ET Energy Transfer LP
$20.61 +2.0% 1M +23.2% 1Y
Market cap
$70.32B
P/E
13.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38B
Div. yield
0.07%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
8 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Energy Transfer leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Energy Transfer 8, Ferrellgas Partners L P 2, Chesapeake Utilities 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCPKETFGPRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.25B $70.32B $120.81M ET
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.6x 13.9x 1.6x FGPR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 21.6x 11.5x — ET
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.6% +33.3% -3.6% ET
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.1% 4.7% 4.1% CPK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.6% 8.4% 38.5% FGPR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 4.0x 4.9x ET
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.07% 0.00% ET
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.4% +23.2% +6.6% ET
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.0%/yr +16.2%/yr -3.2%/yr ET
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 20.3% 17.5% 37.0% ET
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 63/100 49/100 CPK

Percentile Scorecard

CPKETFGPR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCPKETFGPR
Valuation 39 #41 of 67 94 #3 of 35 77 #6 of 23
Growth 94 #5 of 65 61 #14 of 34 33 #13 of 19
Profitability 73 #18 of 64 30 #24 of 34 77 #5 of 18
Financial Health 59 #27 of 64 59 #15 of 35 9 #22 of 24
Shareholder Returns 64 #25 of 67 70 #10 of 31 –
Overall 66 63 49
  • CPK ranked among 67 companies in Regulated Utilities
  • ET ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • FGPR ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCPKETFGPRSPY
1 month +4.8%+2.0%-7.6% -0.8%
3 months -0.6%+3.5%-11.4% +3.5%
6 months +6.2%+8.2%-21.6% +7.0%
Year to date +8.2%+25.0%+9.8% +12.2%
1 year +2.4%+23.2%+6.6% +13.0%
3 years +52.7%+57.2%+160.6% +86.3%
3 years, per year +15.2%+16.3%+37.7% +23.1%
5 years +5.2%+111.8%-14.9% +68.6%
5 years, per year +1.0%+16.2%-3.2% +11.0%
10 years +114.2%+30.9%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +7.9%+2.7%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCPKETFGPRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 20.3%17.5%37.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 21.2%16.6%33.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.24-0.21-0.07 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.121.330.18 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.5%-25.8%-73.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.9%-5.2%-25.7% -1.8%
52-week high $139.06$21.74$27.20 $779.14
52-week low $118.97$16.21$17.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCPKETFGPR
P/E now vs peer median 21.6xmedian 20.8x 14.1xmedian 21.0x 1.6xmedian 9.5x
P/S now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.9x 0.7xmedian 2.7x 0.1xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.6xmedian 13.1x 8.2xmedian 11.0x 5.3xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.8xmedian 36.7x 13.6xmedian 16.6x 1.4xmedian 9.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.7x 1.4xmedian 2.6x -0.1xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median 2.74median 2.23 2.01median 1.92 -0.05median 0.35

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCPKETFGPR
Revenue $993.50M $107.38B $1.86B
Gross profit $669.70M $25.32B $1.03B
Operating income $271.10M $10.78B $196.22M
Net income $150.20M $7.04B $76.61M
Free cash flow -$193.50M $5.22B $86.92M
EPS (diluted) $6.21 $1.46 $9.30
Cash & equivalents $400.00K $1.02B $73.41M
Total debt $1.69B $68.41B $5.98B
Shares (diluted) 24.17M 3.46B 8.22M
Enterprise value $3.24B $63.51B -$197.71M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCPKETFGPR
P/E 21.6x 14.1x 1.6x
P/FCF -16.8x 13.6x 1.4x
P/Operating cash flow 10.6x 5.9x 0.7x
P/S 3.3x 0.7x 0.1x
P/B 1.9x 1.4x -0.1x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 1.6x -0.1x
EV/EBITDA 13.6x 8.2x 5.3x
EV/EBIT 18.2x 12.8x 8.1x
EV/Revenue 5.0x 1.3x 0.9x
EV/FCF -25.5x 26.5x 18.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.0x 11.4x 9.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.74 2.01 -0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCPKETFGPR
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.6% 33.3% -3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.9% 10.0% -3.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 11.3% 18.9% 0.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 13.2% 1.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 10.7% 16.5% 106.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 23.2% 12.0% -7.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 16.4% 16.1% 847.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.4% 9.0% -19.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 12.7% 12.6% 575.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 7.0% -32.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 45.9% 8.8% -8.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.7% 5.9% -1.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 3.2% -8.5% -25.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -102.6% -7.3% 3.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCPKETFGPR
Gross margin 67.4% 23.6% 55.1%
EBITDA margin 36.5% 15.7% 16.1%
Operating margin 27.3% 10.0% 10.5%
Pretax margin 20.8% 7.1% 4.2%
Net margin 15.1% 4.7% 4.1%
FCF margin -19.5% 4.9% 4.7%
Operating cash flow margin 31.0% 11.3% 9.1%
Return on equity 9.0% 14.0% –
Return on assets 3.6% 4.8% 5.1%
Return on invested capital 6.6% 8.4% 38.5%
Return on capital employed 7.7% 8.4% 17.0%
Asset turnover 0.2x 0.7x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.7x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 0.2% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCPKETFGPR
Debt / assets 40.4% 46.2% 105.2%
Debt / equity 1.0x 1.4x -1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.7x 4.0x 4.9x
Debt / FCF -8.7x 13.1x 17.8x
Liabilities / assets 59.9% 65.9% 172.8%
Equity / assets 40.1% 34.1% -72.8%
Interest coverage 3.7x 2.9x 1.7x
Current ratio 0.3x 1.2x 1.1x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.9x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 1.34 – 1.76

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCPKETFGPR
Dividend yield 2.1% 6.5% –
Net buyback yield -2.4% – –
Shareholder yield -0.3% 6.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 42.7% 67.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -33.1% 91.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 11.7% 2.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 19.4% 8.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCPKETFGPR
Forward P/E 21.6xFY2026 11.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $6.24FY2026 $1.80FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +3.8%FY2026 +48.8%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +15.1% -9.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.09BFY2026 $124.23BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +17.2%FY2026 +45.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +4.7% +1.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCPKETFGPR
Held by institutions 92.3% 31.4% 0.0%
Institutions holding 333 1,279 1
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.2% +1.9% –
Institutions buying 188 628 0
Institutions selling 98 340 0
Buyers to sellers 1.92 1.85 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CPKETFGPR
CPK 1.00 0.11 -0.12
ET 0.11 1.00 -0.04
FGPR -0.12 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CPK, ET and FGPR?

Energy Transfer (ET) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) $3.25B, Energy Transfer (ET) $70.32B, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) $120.81M.

Which stock is cheaper, CPK, ET and FGPR?

Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 21.6x, Energy Transfer (ET) 13.9x, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 1.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Energy Transfer (ET) is cheapest (Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 21.6x, Energy Transfer (ET) 11.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Energy Transfer (ET) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +14.6%, Energy Transfer (ET) +33.3%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) has the highest net margin (Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 15.1%, Energy Transfer (ET) 4.7%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) leads (Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 6.6%, Energy Transfer (ET) 8.4%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 38.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Energy Transfer (ET) returned the most: Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +2.4%, Energy Transfer (ET) +23.2%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) +6.6%. Over five years, Energy Transfer (ET) compounded fastest (Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) +1.0%/yr, Energy Transfer (ET) +16.2%/yr, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) -3.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Energy Transfer (ET) has the highest dividend yield: Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 0.02%, Energy Transfer (ET) 0.07%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 0.00%. Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Energy Transfer (ET) has been the steadiest (Chesapeake Utilities (CPK) 20.3%, Energy Transfer (ET) 17.5%, Ferrellgas Partners L P (FGPR) 37.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CPK, ET and FGPR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Energy Transfer (ET) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.