CPHC vs LVS vs WYNN Stock Comparison

Canterbury Park Holding, Las Vegas Sands and Wynn Resorts Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
LVS Las Vegas Sands Corp
$36.23 -6.6% 1M -37.7% 1Y
Market cap
$23.67B
P/E
14.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$13.60B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
WYNN Wynn Resorts Ltd
$71.38 -11.3% 1M -40.9% 1Y
Market cap
$7.61B
P/E
17.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.41B
Div. yield
–
Casinos Consumer Discretionary

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Las Vegas Sands leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Las Vegas Sands 8, Canterbury Park Holding 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCPHCLVSWYNNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $80.32M $23.67B $7.61B LVS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 675.0x 14.7x 17.0x LVS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.9x 16.5x LVS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.6% +10.9% +6.4% LVS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.2% 11.8% 6.1% LVS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 14.9% 10.1% LVS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.9x 5.0x LVS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -0.2% -37.7% -40.9% CPHC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -0.1%/yr -1.4%/yr -4.5%/yr CPHC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.0% 31.4% 32.1% CPHC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 81/100 59/100 LVS

Percentile Scorecard

CPHCLVSWYNN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCPHCLVSWYNN
Valuation 84 #8 of 44 86 #7 of 44 93 #4 of 44
Growth 19 #35 of 43 81 #9 of 43 74 #12 of 43
Profitability 56 #19 of 42 95 #3 of 42 71 #13 of 42
Financial Health 87 #7 of 47 59 #20 of 47 24 #36 of 47
Shareholder Returns 37 #18 of 28 85 #5 of 28 33 #19 of 28
Overall 57 81 59
  • CPHC ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • LVS ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure
  • WYNN ranked among 48 companies in Gaming and Leisure

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCPHCLVSWYNNSPY
1 month +0.8%-6.6%-11.3% +0.9%
3 months +0.9%-25.4%-27.9% +5.9%
6 months -0.6%-32.6%-31.5% +8.5%
Year to date +2.1%-44.3%-40.7% +13.3%
1 year -0.2%-37.7%-40.9% +12.4%
3 years -20.8%-23.0%-18.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year -7.5%-8.3%-6.5% +23.5%
5 years -0.5%-6.6%-20.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year -0.1%-1.4%-4.5% +11.0%
10 years +49.0%-37.3%-24.2% +263.4%
10 years, per year +4.1%-4.6%-2.7% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCPHCLVSWYNNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.0%31.4%32.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 20.2%35.5%31.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.150.570.89 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.01-1.20-1.27 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.7%-52.7%-46.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.7%-47.9%-46.4% -0.9%
52-week high $16.84$69.49$133.09 $779.14
52-week low $14.50$35.67$71.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCPHCLVSWYNN
P/E now vs peer median 680.9xmedian 16.8x 14.4xmedian 16.8x 16.3xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.9x 1.7xmedian 1.9x 1.0xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 9.1xmedian 10.2x 8.0xmedian 10.2x 9.0xmedian 10.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median 15.8xmedian 11.2x 9.4xmedian 11.2x 9.3xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.2x -66.0xmedian 2.2x -8.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median -8.63median 0.44 0.34median 0.44 0.05median 0.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCPHCLVSWYNN
Revenue $60.44M $13.60B $7.41B
Gross profit $54.65M $6.46B $2.30B
Operating income $2.72M $2.85B $1.17B
Net income $118.99K $1.81B $583.88M
Free cash flow $5.17M $2.41B $791.87M
R&D – $180.00M –
EPS (diluted) $0.02 $2.52 $4.36
Cash & equivalents $14.03M $2.86B $1.57B
Total debt – $15.44B $10.72B
Shares (diluted) 5.15M 640.00M 102.98M
Enterprise value $10.32M $10.27B $1.90B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCPHCLVSWYNN
P/E 680.9x 14.4x 16.3x
P/FCF 15.8x 9.4x 9.3x
P/Operating cash flow 9.4x 6.5x 5.1x
P/S 1.3x 1.7x 1.0x
P/B 1.0x -66.0x -8.1x
P/Tangible book 1.0x -66.0x -6.6x
EV/EBITDA 9.1x 8.0x 9.0x
EV/EBIT 22.9x 12.4x 14.2x
EV/Revenue 1.0x 2.6x 2.2x
EV/FCF 12.1x 14.7x 20.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.2x 10.1x 11.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -8.63 0.34 0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCPHCLVSWYNN
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.6% 10.9% 6.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.4% 16.6% 14.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.2% 5.5% 2.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -2.6% 16.0% -9.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -41.2% 5.4% 12.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -43.2% 25.6% 35.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -20.6% 0.2% 30.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -78.5% 39.4% 98.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -22.0% 10.9% 17.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -78.9% 42.3% 312.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 19.3% 27.5% 12.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -9.7% 18.1% 33.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 631.1% 86.1% 6.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 10.3% 23.5% 40.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCPHCLVSWYNN
Gross margin 90.4% 47.5% 31.0%
EBITDA margin 11.4% 32.4% 24.9%
Operating margin 4.5% 20.9% 15.7%
Pretax margin 0.5% 16.3% 9.4%
Net margin 0.2% 11.8% 6.1%
FCF margin 8.5% 17.7% 10.7%
Operating cash flow margin 14.3% 25.6% 19.7%
Return on equity 0.1% 656.1% –
Return on assets 0.1% 9.2% 4.5%
Return on invested capital – 14.9% 10.1%
Return on capital employed 2.7% 18.9% 11.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 72.5x 1.9x 2.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.2% 0.5% 1.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCPHCLVSWYNN
Debt / assets – 79.5% 81.5%
Debt / equity – -44.9x -11.8x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.9x 5.0x
Debt / FCF – 6.4x 13.5x
Liabilities / assets 28.2% 101.8% 106.9%
Equity / assets 71.8% -1.8% -6.9%
Interest coverage – 3.8x 1.9x
Current ratio 2.2x 0.8x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.7x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 1.4x 0.6x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 2.87 2.19 1.01

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCPHCLVSWYNN
Dividend yield 1.8% 3.2% 1.4%
Net buyback yield – 12.0% 2.3%
Shareholder yield 1.8% 15.2% 3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCPHCLVSWYNN
Forward P/E – 13.9xFY2026 16.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.60FY2026 $4.32FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -13.6%FY2026 +3.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.4% -3.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $14.18BFY2026 $7.74BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +8.9%FY2026 +8.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.0% -7.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCPHCLVSWYNN
Held by institutions 41.6% 41.0% 71.9%
Institutions holding 27 710 497
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.6% +0.1% +3.9%
Institutions buying 10 331 212
Institutions selling 8 290 192
Buyers to sellers 1.25 1.14 1.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CPHCLVSWYNN
CPHC 1.00 0.00 -0.05
LVS 0.00 1.00 0.61
WYNN -0.05 0.61 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CPHC, LVS and WYNN?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) $80.32M, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) $23.67B, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) $7.61B.

Which stock is cheaper, CPHC, LVS and WYNN?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) 675.0x, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.7x, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 17.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) is cheapest (Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 13.9x, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 16.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) +0.6%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) +10.9%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) +6.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Las Vegas Sands (LVS) has the highest net margin (Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) 0.2%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 11.8%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 6.1%). On return on invested capital, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) leads (Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 14.9%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 10.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) returned the most: Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) -0.2%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -37.7%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) -40.9%. Over five years, Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) compounded fastest (Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) -0.1%/yr, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) -1.4%/yr, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) -4.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) has been the steadiest (Canterbury Park Holding (CPHC) 21.0%, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) 31.4%, Wynn Resorts (WYNN) 32.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CPHC, LVS and WYNN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Las Vegas Sands (LVS) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.