COP vs MTDR Stock Comparison

Conocophillips and Matador Resources Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
COP Conocophillips
$147.97 +16.2% 1M +66.8% 1Y
Market cap
$177.76B
P/E
19.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$65.28B
Div. yield
2.27%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
7 wins
MTDR Matador Resources Co
$59.25 +15.0% 1M +50.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.35B
P/E
10.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.92B
Div. yield
2.56%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Conocophillips leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Conocophillips 7, Matador Resources 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCOPMTDRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $177.76B $7.35B COP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.3x 10.2x MTDR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 13.3x 6.9x MTDR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.5% +2.8% COP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.2% 18.5% MTDR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.5% 13.2% COP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.8x COP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.27% 2.56% MTDR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +66.8% +50.3% COP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +14.5%/yr +7.0%/yr COP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 30.2% 40.9% COP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 66/100 MTDR

Percentile Scorecard

COPMTDR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCOPMTDR
Valuation 44 #56 of 99 84 #17 of 99
Growth 56 #43 of 97 52 #47 of 97
Profitability 88 #12 of 96 77 #23 of 96
Financial Health 71 #30 of 102 34 #68 of 102
Shareholder Returns 48 #40 of 76 81 #15 of 76
Overall 62 66
  • COP ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • MTDR ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCOPMTDRSPY
1 month +16.2%+15.0% -0.2%
3 months +29.7%+28.5% +3.9%
6 months +19.0%-3.1% +8.2%
Year to date +58.1%+39.6% +12.9%
1 year +66.8%+50.3% +12.3%
3 years +25.6%-1.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +7.9%-0.6% +23.3%
5 years +96.9%+40.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year +14.5%+7.0% +10.9%
10 years +236.3%+162.6% +261.1%
10 years, per year +12.9%+10.1% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCOPMTDRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 30.2%40.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 29.6%41.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.71-0.79 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.211.23 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.7%-50.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.3%-9.5% -1.2%
52-week high $151.41$65.45 $779.14
52-week low $85.66$37.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCOPMTDR
P/E now vs peer median 19.3xmedian 13.0x 10.2xmedian 13.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 2.1x 1.9xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 5.9x 3.8xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.7xmedian 11.1x -19.0xmedian 11.1x
P/B now vs peer median 2.7xmedian 1.5x 1.2xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -1.83median 2.27 -1.16median 2.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCOPMTDR
Revenue $65.28B $3.92B
Gross profit $41.24B $3.69B
Operating income $31.28B $1.17B
Net income $9.28B $814.00M
Free cash flow $10.06B -$385.76M
R&D $393.00M –
EPS (diluted) $7.64 $5.83
Cash & equivalents $6.57B $26.32M
Total debt $23.29B $1.85B
Shares (diluted) 1.21B 124.16M
Enterprise value $150.47B $7.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCOPMTDR
P/E 19.3x 10.2x
P/FCF 17.7x -19.0x
P/Operating cash flow 8.1x 2.8x
P/S 2.7x 1.9x
P/B 2.7x 1.2x
P/Tangible book 2.7x 1.2x
EV/EBITDA 4.5x 3.8x
EV/EBIT 6.2x 7.8x
EV/Revenue 3.0x 2.3x
EV/FCF 19.2x -23.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 8.8x 3.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.83 -1.16

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCOPMTDR
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.5% 2.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.0% 12.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.5% 1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.6% 11.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.2% -18.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -2.0% -4.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 1.1% -14.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -10.5% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 4.8% -15.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -10.6% -8.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 10.6% 7.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.8% 13.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 45.4% -153.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -3.5% -36.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCOPMTDR
Gross margin 63.2% 94.2%
EBITDA margin 66.0% 61.5%
Operating margin 47.9% 30.0%
Pretax margin 22.4% 24.4%
Net margin 14.2% 18.5%
FCF margin 15.4% -9.9%
Operating cash flow margin 33.6% 66.5%
Return on equity 14.3% 13.4%
Return on assets 7.5% 6.3%
Return on invested capital 22.5% 13.2%
Return on capital employed 28.2% 10.4%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.4x 3.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCOPMTDR
Debt / assets 18.7% 13.7%
Debt / equity 0.4x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.4x 0.8x
Debt / FCF 2.3x -4.8x
Liabilities / assets 47.4% 53.7%
Equity / assets 52.6% 46.3%
Interest coverage 39.2x 5.4x
Current ratio 1.5x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.6x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 4.05 1.49

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCOPMTDR
Dividend yield 2.3% 2.6%
Net buyback yield 3.0% 0.3%
Shareholder yield 5.3% 2.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) 43.8% 21.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 40.4% -46.2%
Dividend growth (1Y) 7.4% 32.7%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -15.4% 17.5%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCOPMTDR
Forward P/E 13.3xFY2026 6.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.12FY2026 $8.58FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +80.5%FY2026 +49.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% +10.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $76.43BFY2026 $4.06BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +24.2%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.8% +26.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCOPMTDR
Held by institutions 84.0% 96.8%
Institutions holding 2,436 493
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.6% +3.2%
Institutions buying 1,119 273
Institutions selling 961 149
Buyers to sellers 1.16 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

COPMTDR
COP 1.00 0.79
MTDR 0.79 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COP and MTDR?

Conocophillips (COP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Conocophillips (COP) $177.76B, Matador Resources (MTDR) $7.35B.

Which stock is cheaper, COP and MTDR?

Matador Resources (MTDR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Conocophillips (COP) 19.3x, Matador Resources (MTDR) 10.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Matador Resources (MTDR) is cheapest (Conocophillips (COP) 13.3x, Matador Resources (MTDR) 6.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Conocophillips (COP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Conocophillips (COP) +8.5%, Matador Resources (MTDR) +2.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Matador Resources (MTDR) has the highest net margin (Conocophillips (COP) 14.2%, Matador Resources (MTDR) 18.5%). On return on invested capital, Conocophillips (COP) leads (Conocophillips (COP) 22.5%, Matador Resources (MTDR) 13.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Conocophillips (COP) returned the most: Conocophillips (COP) +66.8%, Matador Resources (MTDR) +50.3%. Over five years, Conocophillips (COP) compounded fastest (Conocophillips (COP) +14.5%/yr, Matador Resources (MTDR) +7.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Matador Resources (MTDR) has the highest dividend yield: Conocophillips (COP) 2.27%, Matador Resources (MTDR) 2.56%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Conocophillips (COP) has been the steadiest (Conocophillips (COP) 30.2%, Matador Resources (MTDR) 40.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do COP and MTDR move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.79, a strong positive relationship. Holding both adds little diversification.

Which is the better stock, COP and MTDR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Conocophillips (COP) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.