CON vs FMS vs LDDD Stock Comparison

Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Fresenius Medical Care AG and Longduoduo Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG
$22.50 -0.8% 1M -17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$12.57B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.07B
Div. yield
3.82%
Healthcare Services Healthcare
5 wins
LDDD Longduoduo Co Ltd
$0.51 0.0% 1M -45.2% 1Y
Market cap
$15.31M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.82M
Div. yield
–
Healthcare Services Healthcare

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Concentra Group Holdings Parent leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Concentra Group Holdings Parent 6, Fresenius Medical Care AG 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCONFMSLDDDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.10B $12.57B $15.31M FMS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.2x 12.0x -26.5x FMS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.3x 9.5x — FMS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +14.0% -47.8% -57.2% CON
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.7% 9.9% -31.8% FMS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 14.2% 0.2% — CON
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 200.7x — CON
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.61% 3.82% — FMS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +92.5% -17.3% -45.2% CON
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -8.3%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.8% 31.1% 48.1% CON
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 58/100 51/100 20/100 CON

Percentile Scorecard

CONFMSLDDD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCONFMSLDDD
Valuation 59 #38 of 92 71 #27 of 92 12 #81 of 92
Growth 63 #33 of 87 12 #77 of 87 0 #87 of 87
Profitability 88 #11 of 86 64 #32 of 86 20 #69 of 86
Financial Health 26 #72 of 97 14 #84 of 97 49 #50 of 97
Shareholder Returns 55 #26 of 56 93 #5 of 56 –
Overall 58 51 20
  • CON ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • FMS ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • LDDD ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCONFMSLDDDSPY
1 month +14.3%-0.8%0.0% -0.2%
3 months +22.3%-9.1%0.0% +3.9%
6 months +77.4%0.0%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date +103.4%-5.5%-13.6% +12.9%
1 year +92.5%-17.3%-45.2% +12.3%
3 years —+37.2%-92.5% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+11.1%-57.8% +23.3%
5 years —-35.2%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —-8.3%— +10.9%
10 years —-44.4%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-5.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCONFMSLDDDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.8%31.1%48.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.1%36.8%— 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.420.19-0.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.32-0.56-0.94 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -23.5%-63.9%-99.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.5%-17.3%-45.2% -1.2%
52-week high $40.22$27.20$0.93 $779.14
52-week low $18.71$20.19$0.51 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCONFMSLDDD
P/E now vs peer median 25.2xmedian 24.6x 12.0xmedian 24.6x -26.5xmedian 24.6x
P/S now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.6x 8.4xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 14.6x 205.4xmedian 14.6x -26.3xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.1xmedian 21.6x 6.0xmedian 21.6x -79.0xmedian 21.6x
P/B now vs peer median 10.5xmedian 3.2x 0.8xmedian 3.2x 20.3xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.66 0.57median 0.66 0.18median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCONFMSLDDD
Revenue $2.29B $11.07B $1.82M
Gross profit $670.56M -$5.62B $1.81M
Operating income $374.81M $879.32M -$633.18K
Net income $203.80M $1.38B -$642.27K
Free cash flow $267.42M $2.08B -$193.75K
R&D – $180.01M –
EPS (diluted) $1.56 $1.79 $-0.02
Cash & equivalents $158.04M $1.21B $1.59M
Total debt $1.57B $572.99B –
Shares (diluted) 127.79M 612.52M 30.02M
Enterprise value $4.78B $5.64B $9.76M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCONFMSLDDD
P/E 25.2x 12.0x -26.5x
P/FCF 19.1x 6.0x -79.0x
P/Operating cash flow 15.2x 3.8x -93.8x
P/S 2.2x 1.1x 8.4x
P/B 10.5x 0.8x 20.3x
P/Tangible book 20.2x 0.9x 20.3x
EV/EBITDA 14.2x 205.4x -26.3x
EV/EBIT 17.4x 628.2x -21.7x
EV/Revenue 2.9x 49.9x 7.5x
EV/FCF 24.4x 265.6x -70.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.4x 167.5x -84.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.57 0.18

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCONFMSLDDD
Revenue growth (1Y) 14.0% -47.8% -57.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -18.6% -21.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.9% -207.2% -56.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -45.2% -17.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 18.9% -45.5% -214.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -16.4% -187.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 32.6% 49.8% -230.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 18.2% -219.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 33.5% 52.0% -225.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 20.9% -145.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 29.2% 9.3% -158.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.3% -29.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 43.1% -7.7% -188.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.8% -30.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCONFMSLDDD
Gross margin 29.3% -50.7% 99.1%
EBITDA margin 20.0% 24.3% -28.7%
Operating margin 16.4% 7.9% -34.7%
Pretax margin 11.7% 15.8% -31.6%
Net margin 8.7% 9.9% -31.8%
FCF margin 11.7% 18.8% -10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 14.7% 29.8% -8.9%
Return on equity 44.8% 2.7% -83.0%
Return on assets 7.0% 1.2% -33.7%
Return on invested capital 14.2% 0.2% –
Return on capital employed 14.5% 3.2% -101.6%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.3x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 2.4x 0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCONFMSLDDD
Debt / assets 52.3% 1,515% –
Debt / equity 3.2x 35.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x 200.7x –
Debt / FCF 5.9x 260.4x –
Liabilities / assets 83.9% 56.8% 63.4%
Equity / assets 16.1% 43.2% 36.6%
Interest coverage – 2.0x –
Current ratio 1.4x 1.1x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.2x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 1.2x
Altman Z-score 2.55 1.32 2.61

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCONFMSLDDD
Dividend yield 0.6% 3.8% –
Net buyback yield 0.5% 8.6% –
Shareholder yield 1.1% 12.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) 15.7% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 12.0% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 33.4% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCONFMSLDDD
Forward P/E 23.3xFY2026 9.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.72FY2026 $2.37FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +25.5%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +10.5% +7.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.30BFY2026 $21.50BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +6.3%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +3.1% -0.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCONFMSLDDD
Held by institutions 87.3% 7.3% –
Institutions holding 291 235 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.0% -2.9% –
Institutions buying 166 151 –
Institutions selling 81 41 –
Buyers to sellers 2.05 3.68 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CONFMSLDDD
CON 1.00 0.27 -0.03
FMS 0.27 1.00 -0.06
LDDD -0.03 -0.06 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CON, FMS and LDDD?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) $5.10B, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) $12.57B, Longduoduo (LDDD) $15.31M.

Which stock is cheaper, CON, FMS and LDDD?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 25.2x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 12.0x, Longduoduo (LDDD) -26.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is cheapest (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 23.3x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) +14.0%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -47.8%, Longduoduo (LDDD) -57.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest net margin (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 8.7%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.9%, Longduoduo (LDDD) -31.8%). On return on invested capital, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) leads (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 14.2%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 0.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) returned the most: Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) +92.5%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -17.3%, Longduoduo (LDDD) -45.2%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest dividend yield: Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 0.61%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 3.82%. Longduoduo (LDDD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) has been the steadiest (Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) 27.8%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 31.1%, Longduoduo (LDDD) 48.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CON, FMS and LDDD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Concentra Group Holdings Parent (CON) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.