COMP vs RKT vs UWMC Stock Comparison

Compass, Rocket Companies and UWM Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
COMP Compass, Inc.
$9.69 +3.2% 1M +20.7% 1Y
Market cap
$7.33B
P/E
109.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.56B
Div. yield
–
Residential Brokerage Real Estate
2 wins
RKT Rocket Companies, Inc.
$11.48 -5.7% 1M -35.8% 1Y
Market cap
$33.58B
P/E
71.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$10.02B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
6 wins
UWMC UWM Holdings Corp
$1.40 +13.8% 1M -76.1% 1Y
Market cap
$528.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$3.58B
Div. yield
–
Mortgage Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Rocket Companies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Rocket Companies 6, UWM Holdings 3, Compass 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCOMPRKTUWMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.33B $33.58B $528.23M RKT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 109.7x 71.3x -14.2x RKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 60.6x 19.1x 7.4x UWMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +67.8% +101.7% +26.1% RKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.6% 4.7% -1.0% RKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.0% 2.4% 6.3% UWMC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 25.9x 10.8x 10.6x UWMC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.7% -35.8% -76.1% COMP
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.7%/yr -6.5%/yr -27.4%/yr COMP
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.9% 58.9% 79.6% RKT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 41/100 37/100 RKT

Percentile Scorecard

COMPRKTUWMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCOMPRKTUWMC
Valuation 24 #14 of 18 17 #142 of 170 21 #135 of 170
Growth 80 #4 of 16 91 #16 of 160 16 #135 of 160
Profitability 27 #12 of 16 35 #97 of 149 32 #102 of 149
Financial Health 31 #12 of 17 46 #86 of 158 18 #130 of 158
Shareholder Returns – 15 #115 of 135 97 #5 of 135
Overall 40 41 37
  • COMP ranked among 19 companies in Real Estate Services
  • RKT ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit
  • UWMC ranked among 175 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCOMPRKTUWMCSPY
1 month +3.2%-5.7%+13.8% -0.8%
3 months -18.0%-14.9%-24.3% +3.5%
6 months +19.8%-25.7%-62.6% +7.0%
Year to date -8.3%-40.7%-68.0% +12.2%
1 year +20.7%-35.8%-76.1% +13.0%
3 years +375.0%+57.3%-71.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year +68.2%+16.3%-34.6% +23.1%
5 years -25.2%-28.4%-79.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -5.7%-6.5%-27.4% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureCOMPRKTUWMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.9%58.9%79.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 55.6%57.8%89.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.352.251.44 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.32-0.61-0.96 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.3%-64.8%-89.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.6%-51.0%-77.0% -1.8%
52-week high $13.58$23.44$6.10 $779.14
52-week low $6.68$10.53$1.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCOMPRKTUWMC
P/E now vs peer median 110.0xmedian 21.2x 69.1xmedian 11.0x -12.7xmedian 11.0x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 0.7x 4.3xmedian 2.6x 0.6xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 103.0xmedian 9.8x 29.9xmedian 13.1x 14.9xmedian 13.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 56.9xmedian 12.3x -55.8xmedian 6.9x -0.5xmedian 6.9x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 1.8x 1.8xmedian 0.7x 2.3xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 4.00median 0.51 0.44median 0.32 0.25median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCOMPRKTUWMC
Revenue $10.56B $10.02B $3.58B
Operating income -$276.10M – –
Net income $66.90M $471.36M -$104.96M
Free cash flow $128.30M -$772.00M -$4.92B
R&D $360.50M – –
EPS (diluted) $0.08 $0.17 $-0.11
Cash & equivalents $694.00M $3.10B $498.41M
Total debt $3.14B $27.41B $19.23B
Shares (diluted) 842.38M 2.84B 337.53M
Enterprise value $5.78B $19.26B -$1.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTUWMC
P/E 110.0x 69.1x -12.7x
P/FCF 56.9x -55.8x -0.5x
P/Operating cash flow 47.2x -68.0x -0.5x
P/S 0.7x 4.3x 0.6x
P/B 2.4x 1.8x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 486.6x 9.3x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA 103.0x 29.9x 14.9x
EV/EBIT -35.3x 39.0x 16.8x
EV/Revenue 0.9x 6.7x 2.2x
EV/FCF 76.0x -87.3x -1.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 63.0x -106.3x -1.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.00 0.44 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTUWMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 67.8% 101.7% 26.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 39.7% 27.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -368.0% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 17.8% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 223.2% 4,530% -175.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% 39.3% -31.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 186.5% 5,670% -287.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 157.4% -51.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -5.6% 70.4% -103.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 42.5% -30.9% -18.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -12.4% 65.1% -100.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 37.8% -32.0% -18.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTUWMC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 0.9% 22.5% 14.6%
Operating margin -2.6% – –
Pretax margin -3.3% 6.6% -3.2%
Net margin 0.6% 4.7% -1.0%
FCF margin 1.2% -7.7% -137.6%
Operating cash flow margin 1.5% -6.3% -135.9%
Return on equity 2.3% 2.0% -8.1%
Return on assets 0.8% 0.8% -0.6%
Return on invested capital 0.0% 2.4% 6.3%
Return on capital employed -4.0% – –
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.2x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.3x -1.3x 46.3x
Stock comp / revenue 2.5% 4.3% 1.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTUWMC
Debt / assets 37.7% 45.0% 33.5%
Debt / equity 1.1x 1.2x 6.1x
Net debt / EBITDA 25.9x 10.8x 10.6x
Debt / FCF 24.5x -35.5x -1.2x
Liabilities / assets 64.2% 61.4% 94.5%
Equity / assets 35.8% 38.6% 5.5%
Interest coverage -3.4x 1.6x 0.8x
Current ratio 1.1x – –
Quick ratio 0.7x – –
Cash ratio 0.5x – –
Altman Z-score 1.55 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCOMPRKTUWMC
Dividend yield – – 21.4%
Net buyback yield -0.4% -0.2% –
Shareholder yield -0.4% -0.2% 21.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCOMPRKTUWMC
Forward P/E 60.6xFY2026 19.1xFY2026 7.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $0.60FY2026 $0.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +114.3%FY2026 +58.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +37.5% +21.7% +26.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $15.07BFY2026 $11.31BFY2026 $2.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +116.5%FY2026 +68.8%FY2026 -5.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.9% +6.4% +37.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCOMPRKTUWMC
Held by institutions 93.4% 50.4% 79.7%
Institutions holding 431 793 290
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.4% +16.2% +31.8%
Institutions buying 242 429 213
Institutions selling 119 259 50
Buyers to sellers 2.03 1.66 4.26

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

COMPRKTUWMC
COMP 1.00 0.58 0.32
RKT 0.58 1.00 0.51
UWMC 0.32 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COMP, RKT and UWMC?

Rocket Companies (RKT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Compass (COMP) $7.33B, Rocket Companies (RKT) $33.58B, UWM Holdings (UWMC) $528.23M.

Which stock is cheaper, COMP, RKT and UWMC?

Rocket Companies (RKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Compass (COMP) 109.7x, Rocket Companies (RKT) 71.3x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -14.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, UWM Holdings (UWMC) is cheapest (Compass (COMP) 60.6x, Rocket Companies (RKT) 19.1x, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 7.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rocket Companies (RKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Compass (COMP) +67.8%, Rocket Companies (RKT) +101.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) +26.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Rocket Companies (RKT) has the highest net margin (Compass (COMP) 0.6%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 4.7%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -1.0%). On return on invested capital, UWM Holdings (UWMC) leads (Compass (COMP) 0.0%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 2.4%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 6.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Compass (COMP) returned the most: Compass (COMP) +20.7%, Rocket Companies (RKT) -35.8%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -76.1%. Over five years, Compass (COMP) compounded fastest (Compass (COMP) -5.7%/yr, Rocket Companies (RKT) -6.5%/yr, UWM Holdings (UWMC) -27.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Rocket Companies (RKT) has been the steadiest (Compass (COMP) 64.9%, Rocket Companies (RKT) 58.9%, UWM Holdings (UWMC) 79.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, COMP, RKT and UWMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Rocket Companies (RKT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.