COLM vs WRBY vs YETI Stock Comparison

Columbia Sportswear, Warby Parker and YETI Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
COLM Columbia Sportswear Co
$61.17 +6.2% 1M +11.4% 1Y
Market cap
$3.09B
P/E
15.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.41B
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
2 wins
WRBY Warby Parker Inc.
$25.08 -6.1% 1M +16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$3.07B
P/E
397.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$911.61M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
1 win
YETI YETI Holdings, Inc.
$42.25 0.0% 1M +17.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.19B
P/E
14.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.00B
Div. yield
–
Sporting Goods Consumer Discretionary
6 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

YETI Holdings leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (YETI Holdings 6, Columbia Sportswear 2, Warby Parker 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCOLMWRBYYETILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.09B $3.07B $3.19B YETI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.0x 397.2x 14.5x YETI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 14.5x 57.0x 14.5x YETI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.1% +11.0% +9.8% WRBY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.0% 0.8% 11.0% YETI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 30.1% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.4% +16.7% +17.1% YETI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.8%/yr -14.5%/yr -15.0%/yr COLM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 36.0% 75.7% 39.7% COLM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 69/100 44/100 71/100 YETI

Percentile Scorecard

COLMWRBYYETI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCOLMWRBYYETI
Valuation 80 #10 of 45 5 #43 of 45 52 #17 of 34
Growth 31 #30 of 43 81 #9 of 43 81 #7 of 32
Profitability 70 #13 of 41 35 #27 of 41 100 #1 of 32
Financial Health 78 #12 of 52 80 #11 of 52 50 #17 of 33
Shareholder Returns 85 #6 of 34 18 #28 of 34 –
Overall 69 44 71
  • COLM ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • WRBY ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • YETI ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCOLMWRBYYETISPY
1 month +6.2%-6.1%0.0% -0.2%
3 months -5.1%-3.5%-18.5% +3.9%
6 months +0.1%+11.3%+7.2% +8.2%
Year to date +11.0%+15.1%-4.3% +12.9%
1 year +11.4%+16.7%+17.1% +12.3%
3 years -14.3%+94.7%+2.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year -5.0%+24.9%+0.9% +23.3%
5 years -40.2%-54.4%-55.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year -9.8%-14.5%-15.0% +10.9%
10 years +8.9%—— +261.1%
10 years, per year +0.9%—— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCOLMWRBYYETISPY
Volatility, 1Y 36.0%75.7%39.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.0%67.5%38.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.632.131.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.320.220.43 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.0%-83.7%-75.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.8%-17.3%-19.8% -1.2%
52-week high $67.79$30.34$52.68 $779.14
52-week low $49.63$16.49$32.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCOLMWRBYYETI
P/E now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 16.4x 401.5xmedian 16.4x 14.3xmedian 17.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 0.7x 3.4xmedian 0.7x 1.5xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 9.9x 47.5xmedian 9.9x —median 9.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.7xmedian 12.0x 142.2xmedian 12.0x —median 10.2x
P/B now vs peer median 2.0xmedian 2.2x 7.9xmedian 2.2x 5.1xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median -2.89median 0.64 14.29median 0.64 0.25median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCOLMWRBYYETI
Revenue $3.41B $911.61M $2.00B
Gross profit $1.78B $498.49M $1.19B
Operating income $257.00M $1.55M $285.40M
Net income $206.03M $7.74M $220.10M
Free cash flow $321.30M $21.75M –
EPS (diluted) $4.02 $0.06 $2.90
Cash & equivalents $532.31M $292.67M $59.82M
Total debt – – $330.21M
Shares (diluted) 51.26M 125.75M 75.78M
Enterprise value $904.92M $1.93B $2.51B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCOLMWRBYYETI
P/E 15.2x 401.5x 14.3x
P/FCF 9.7x 142.2x –
P/Operating cash flow 8.2x 32.4x –
P/S 0.9x 3.4x 1.5x
P/B 2.0x 7.9x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 7.9x 8.0x
EV/EBITDA 8.0x 47.5x –
EV/EBIT 9.8x 1,804x 10.9x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 3.1x 1.6x
EV/FCF 7.8x 128.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 6.5x 29.4x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.89 14.29 0.25

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCOLMWRBYYETI
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.1% 11.0% 9.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -1.5% 12.9% 8.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.2% 11.4% 12.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 0.3% 12.5% 15.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -5.8% 108.6% 21.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -10.9% 26.4% 46.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -8.3% 183.9% 24.2%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -11.0% 28.7% 49.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -2.1% 181.8% 36.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.3% 28.1% 56.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.0% -18.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 58.0% 22.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 24.9% -58.5% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 92.8% 249.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCOLMWRBYYETI
Gross margin 52.2% 54.7% 59.6%
EBITDA margin 9.2% 6.5% –
Operating margin 7.5% 0.2% 14.3%
Pretax margin 8.1% 1.1% 14.5%
Net margin 6.0% 0.8% 11.0%
FCF margin 9.4% 2.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 11.2% 10.5% –
Return on equity 12.9% 2.0% 34.9%
Return on assets 7.7% 1.0% 17.4%
Return on invested capital – – 30.1%
Return on capital employed 13.3% 0.3% 33.2%
Asset turnover 1.3x 1.2x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 12.3x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 3.8% 2.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCOLMWRBYYETI
Debt / assets – – 7.7%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 42.8% 49.2% 53.2%
Equity / assets 57.2% 50.8% 46.8%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.5x 2.3x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.8x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.8x 1.8x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 4.40 5.16 6.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCOLMWRBYYETI
Dividend yield 2.0% – –
Net buyback yield 6.9% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 8.9% -0.1% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCOLMWRBYYETI
Forward P/E 14.5xFY2026 57.0xFY2026 14.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.21FY2026 $0.44FY2026 $2.92FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.1%FY2026 +22.2%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.8% +36.4% +18.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $3.31BFY2026 $920.99MFY2026 $1.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -2.8%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026 +0.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.8% +30.7% +17.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCOLMWRBYYETI
Held by institutions 51.1% 100.0% 93.7%
Institutions holding 323 301 456
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.8% +15.2% -3.3%
Institutions buying 161 195 222
Institutions selling 111 77 167
Buyers to sellers 1.45 2.53 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

COLMWRBYYETI
COLM 1.00 0.30 0.47
WRBY 0.30 1.00 0.27
YETI 0.47 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, COLM, WRBY and YETI?

YETI Holdings (YETI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Columbia Sportswear (COLM) $3.09B, Warby Parker (WRBY) $3.07B, YETI Holdings (YETI) $3.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, COLM, WRBY and YETI?

YETI Holdings (YETI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 15.0x, Warby Parker (WRBY) 397.2x, YETI Holdings (YETI) 14.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, YETI Holdings (YETI) is cheapest (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 14.5x, Warby Parker (WRBY) 57.0x, YETI Holdings (YETI) 14.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Warby Parker (WRBY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Columbia Sportswear (COLM) -0.1%, Warby Parker (WRBY) +11.0%, YETI Holdings (YETI) +9.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

YETI Holdings (YETI) has the highest net margin (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 6.0%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 0.8%, YETI Holdings (YETI) 11.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year YETI Holdings (YETI) returned the most: Columbia Sportswear (COLM) +11.4%, Warby Parker (WRBY) +16.7%, YETI Holdings (YETI) +17.1%. Over five years, Columbia Sportswear (COLM) compounded fastest (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) -9.8%/yr, Warby Parker (WRBY) -14.5%/yr, YETI Holdings (YETI) -15.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Columbia Sportswear (COLM) has been the steadiest (Columbia Sportswear (COLM) 36.0%, Warby Parker (WRBY) 75.7%, YETI Holdings (YETI) 39.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, COLM, WRBY and YETI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, YETI Holdings (YETI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.