CODI vs FIGS vs NWL Stock Comparison

Compass Diversified Holdings, Figs and Newell Brands Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
FIGS FIGS, Inc.
$20.83 +55.1% 1M +153.1% 1Y
Market cap
$3.40B
P/E
54.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$710.08M
Div. yield
–
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
6 wins
NWL Newell Brands Inc.
$5.41 -0.4% 1M +8.6% 1Y
Market cap
$2.31B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$7.25B
Div. yield
0.05%
Home Appliances Consumer Discretionary
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Figs leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Figs 6, Newell Brands 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCODIFIGSNWLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $801.26M $3.40B $2.31B FIGS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.5x 54.9x -10.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 204.8x 57.9x 7.5x NWL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +0.9% +24.7% -2.0% FIGS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -12.3% 8.7% -3.0% FIGS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.2% — 2.2% NWL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 12.1x — 10.0x NWL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.05% NWL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.0% +153.1% +8.6% FIGS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.0%/yr -8.7%/yr -24.3%/yr FIGS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 65.2% 70.4% 61.9% NWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 20/100 67/100 47/100 FIGS

Percentile Scorecard

CODIFIGSNWL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCODIFIGSNWL
Valuation 27 #34 of 46 13 #40 of 46 54 #20 of 42
Growth 38 #27 of 43 100 #1 of 43 49 #22 of 42
Profitability 10 #38 of 42 81 #9 of 42 33 #27 of 40
Financial Health 17 #44 of 53 96 #3 of 53 12 #38 of 43
Shareholder Returns 9 #31 of 34 46 #19 of 34 89 #4 of 28
Overall 20 67 47
  • CODI ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • FIGS ranked among 53 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • NWL ranked among 45 companies in Household Durables

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCODIFIGSNWLSPY
1 month -8.9%+55.1%-0.4% -0.8%
3 months +1.9%+109.8%+4.4% +3.5%
6 months -11.7%+33.4%+29.4% +7.0%
Year to date +113.3%+83.4%+45.4% +12.2%
1 year +28.0%+153.1%+8.6% +13.0%
3 years -40.2%+265.4%-18.8% +86.3%
3 years, per year -15.8%+54.1%-6.7% +23.1%
5 years -65.2%-36.4%-75.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year -19.0%-8.7%-24.3% +11.0%
10 years -44.9%—-89.4% +258.0%
10 years, per year -5.8%—-20.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCODIFIGSNWLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 65.2%70.4%61.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 63.0%65.9%66.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.220.751.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.432.170.14 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -85.8%-91.5%-88.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.4%0.0%-14.9% -1.8%
52-week high $12.71$20.83$6.36 $779.14
52-week low $4.65$7.38$3.11 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCODIFIGSNWL
P/E now vs peer median -3.4xmedian 16.6x 56.0xmedian 16.6x -10.4xmedian 16.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 0.7x 4.6xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 9.7x 37.8xmedian 9.7x 14.9xmedian 12.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median 76.2xmedian 12.2x 33.7xmedian 12.2x 19.5xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.2x 7.4xmedian 2.2x 0.9xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.03median 0.64 0.92median 0.64 -0.86median 0.64

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCODIFIGSNWL
Revenue $1.85B $710.08M $7.25B
Gross profit $807.72M $489.29M $2.57B
Operating income $5.74M $68.19M $164.00M
Net income -$227.18M $61.92M -$221.00M
Free cash flow $10.11M $97.22M $118.00M
EPS (diluted) $-3.02 $0.32 $-0.51
Cash & equivalents $60.75M $108.54M $209.00M
Total debt $1.86B – $5.01B
Shares (diluted) 75.24M 195.14M 430.20M
Enterprise value $537.61M $2.29B $1.46B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCODIFIGSNWL
P/E -3.4x 56.0x -10.4x
P/FCF 76.2x 33.7x 19.5x
P/Operating cash flow 16.6x 30.4x 7.0x
P/S 0.4x 4.6x 0.3x
P/B 1.5x 7.4x 0.9x
P/Tangible book -2.5x 7.4x 2.6x
EV/EBITDA 17.3x 37.8x 14.9x
EV/EBIT 447.8x 43.8x 43.3x
EV/Revenue 1.4x 4.2x 1.0x
EV/FCF 254.2x 30.7x 60.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 55.3x 27.6x 21.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.03 0.92 -0.86

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCODIFIGSNWL
Revenue growth (1Y) 0.9% 24.7% -2.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.6% 10.1% -5.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.7% 27.8% 1.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.8% 9.6% 2.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 744.0% 583.6% 105.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -44.2% 41.0% 45.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -12.2% 762.2% 9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -158.2% 64.4% 11.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -24.4% 664.0% 11.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -126.8% 61.1% 12.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 129.4% 116.9% 105.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 46.5% 82.7% -10.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 104.6% 143.8% 213.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.0% 98.2% -5.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCODIFIGSNWL
Gross margin 43.7% 68.9% 35.5%
EBITDA margin 8.0% 11.1% 6.6%
Operating margin 0.3% 9.6% 2.3%
Pretax margin -14.8% 10.8% -2.5%
Net margin -12.3% 8.7% -3.0%
FCF margin 0.5% 13.7% 1.6%
Operating cash flow margin 2.5% 15.2% 4.6%
Return on equity -49.8% 14.2% -9.2%
Return on assets -9.2% 10.8% -2.0%
Return on invested capital 0.2% – 2.2%
Return on capital employed 0.2% 14.2% 2.0%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.2x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x 1.7x -1.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.4% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCODIFIGSNWL
Debt / assets 62.8% – 45.3%
Debt / equity 3.5x – 2.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 12.1x – 10.0x
Debt / FCF 184.0x – 42.4x
Liabilities / assets 82.1% 24.1% 77.8%
Equity / assets 17.9% 75.9% 22.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 2.7x 5.0x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.0x 3.7x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.2x 3.2x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 0.41 16.70 0.50

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCODIFIGSNWL
Dividend yield 0.0% – 5.2%
Net buyback yield -0.1% 0.9% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% 0.9% 5.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) -8.3% – -57.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) 186.0% – 106.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) -75.1% – 6.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -35.9% – -26.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCODIFIGSNWL
Forward P/E 204.8xFY2026 57.9xFY2026 7.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.05FY2026 $0.36FY2026 $0.72FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -28.6%FY2026 +89.5%FY2026 +26.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +1,200.0% 0.0% -5.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.78BFY2026 $728.69MFY2026 $6.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -4.7%FY2026 +15.5%FY2026 -4.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.1% +18.3% +15.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCODIFIGSNWL
Held by institutions 74.8% 99.1% 100.0%
Institutions holding 181 242 421
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.7% +3.1% +9.2%
Institutions buying 86 139 234
Institutions selling 62 69 124
Buyers to sellers 1.39 2.01 1.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CODIFIGSNWL
CODI 1.00 -0.06 0.15
FIGS -0.06 1.00 0.12
NWL 0.15 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CODI, FIGS and NWL?

Figs (FIGS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI) $801.26M, Figs (FIGS) $3.40B, Newell Brands (NWL) $2.31B.

Which company is growing faster?

Figs (FIGS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI) +0.9%, Figs (FIGS) +24.7%, Newell Brands (NWL) -2.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Figs (FIGS) has the highest net margin (Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI) -12.3%, Figs (FIGS) 8.7%, Newell Brands (NWL) -3.0%). On return on invested capital, Newell Brands (NWL) leads (Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI) 0.2%, Newell Brands (NWL) 2.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Figs (FIGS) returned the most: Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI) +28.0%, Figs (FIGS) +153.1%, Newell Brands (NWL) +8.6%. Over five years, Figs (FIGS) compounded fastest (Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI) -19.0%/yr, Figs (FIGS) -8.7%/yr, Newell Brands (NWL) -24.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Newell Brands (NWL) has the highest dividend yield: Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI) 0.02%, Figs (FIGS) 0.00%, Newell Brands (NWL) 0.05%. Figs (FIGS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Newell Brands (NWL) has been the steadiest (Compass Diversified Holdings (CODI) 65.2%, Figs (FIGS) 70.4%, Newell Brands (NWL) 61.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CODI, FIGS and NWL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Figs (FIGS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.