CNTN vs EXOD vs BLSH Stock Comparison

Canton Strategic Holdings, Exodus Movement and Bullish Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EXOD Exodus Movement, Inc.
$5.60 -20.7% 1M -77.3% 1Y
Market cap
$168.66M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$108.70M
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
1 win
BLSH Bullish
$28.49 -20.2% 1M -45.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.30B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$190.34B
Div. yield
–
Blockchain Infrastructure Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Bullish leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Bullish 4, Exodus Movement 1, Canton Strategic Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTNEXODBLSHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $444.57M $168.66M $4.30B BLSH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.5x -1.2x -2.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 67.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -14.2% -26.5% EXOD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -79.9% -0.7% BLSH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -4.8% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.6x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -31.7% -77.3% -45.8% CNTN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -19.9%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 93.5% 103.5% 73.0% BLSH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 29/100 63/100 BLSH

Percentile Scorecard

CNTNEXODBLSH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTNEXODBLSH
Valuation 38 #62 of 99 30 #70 of 99 77 #24 of 99
Growth 8 #87 of 94 5 #89 of 94 32 #64 of 94
Profitability 39 #55 of 90 29 #64 of 90 47 #48 of 90
Financial Health 97 #4 of 105 14 #91 of 105 95 #6 of 105
Shareholder Returns 14 #52 of 60 66 #21 of 60 –
Overall 39 29 63
  • CNTN ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • EXOD ranked among 109 companies in Fintech
  • BLSH ranked among 109 companies in Fintech

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTNEXODBLSHSPY
1 month -13.9%-20.7%-20.2% +0.7%
3 months +10.8%+6.5%+26.0% +3.7%
6 months -36.5%-26.2%-24.5% +7.1%
Year to date -32.3%-62.1%-24.8% +12.8%
1 year -31.7%-77.3%-45.8% +11.9%
3 years -96.5%+12.0%— +85.2%
3 years, per year -67.3%+3.9%— +22.8%
5 years —-67.1%— +67.6%
5 years, per year —-19.9%— +10.9%

Risk

MeasureCNTNEXODBLSHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 93.5%103.5%73.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 98.9%103.7%70.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.933.302.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.34-0.75-0.63 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.9%-96.4%-70.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -62.6%-77.8%-45.8% -1.2%
52-week high $5.48$25.19$52.57 $779.14
52-week low $1.69$4.63$21.79 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTNEXODBLSH
P/E now vs peer median -4.5xmedian 19.5x -1.2xmedian 19.5x -2.6xmedian 19.5x
P/S now vs peer median 297.2xmedian 2.2x 1.6xmedian 2.2x 0.0xmedian 2.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.8x -1.4xmedian 17.8x -33.7xmedian 17.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -20.1xmedian 16.1x -2.5xmedian 16.1x 37.7xmedian 16.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 2.0x 0.8xmedian 2.0x 1.7xmedian 2.0x
PEG now vs peer median -0.51median 0.98 —median 0.98 —median 0.98

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTNEXODBLSH
Revenue – $108.70M $190.34B
Gross profit – – $71.94M
Operating income -$53.77M – -$124.59M
Net income -$98.12M -$86.90M -$1.43B
Free cash flow -$22.17M -$66.47M $113.88M
EPS (diluted) $-0.45 $-4.53 $-10.84
Cash & equivalents $37.24M $21.21M $86.61M
Total debt – – $11.00K
Shares (diluted) 216.86M 19.19M 127.72M
Enterprise value $346.18M $19.04M -$478.12M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTNEXODBLSH
P/E -4.5x -1.2x -2.6x
P/FCF -20.1x -2.5x 37.7x
P/Operating cash flow -20.1x -2.5x 34.9x
P/S 297.2x 1.6x 0.0x
P/B 1.0x 0.8x 1.7x
P/Tangible book -6.5x 1.1x 1.8x
EV/EBITDA – -1.4x -33.7x
EV/EBIT -7.6x -1.4x -32.0x
EV/Revenue – 1.4x 0.0x
EV/FCF -18.4x -2.2x 35.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -18.4x -2.2x 32.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.51 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTNEXODBLSH
Revenue growth (1Y) – -14.2% -26.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – -17.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -360.0% – -57.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -81.6% – –
Net income growth (1Y) -716.7% -193.9% -858.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -122.4% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 89.2% -202.9% -755.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.8% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -127.9% -207.3% 190.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -44.0% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -127.9% -205.1% 171.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -44.0% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTNEXODBLSH
Gross margin – – 0.0%
EBITDA margin – -96.4% -0.1%
Operating margin – – -0.1%
Pretax margin – -100.2% -0.8%
Net margin – -79.9% -0.7%
FCF margin – -61.1% 0.1%
Operating cash flow margin – -60.9% 0.1%
Return on equity -17.8% -41.4% -55.4%
Return on assets -14.3% -21.0% -44.5%
Return on invested capital – – -4.8%
Return on capital employed -9.4% -281.5% -4.0%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 59.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 0.8x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 14.7% 0.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTNEXODBLSH
Debt / assets – – 0.0%
Debt / equity – – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.6x
Debt / FCF – – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 19.4% 66.3% 20.6%
Equity / assets 80.6% 33.7% 79.4%
Interest coverage – – -2.2x
Current ratio 15.7x 1.1x 23.5x
Quick ratio 14.2x 0.1x 2.5x
Cash ratio 14.2x 0.1x 2.5x
Altman Z-score – 0.05 65.06

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTNEXODBLSH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -23.1% 4.3% –
Shareholder yield -23.1% 4.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTNEXODBLSH
Forward P/E – – 67.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.70FY2026 $-2.52FY2026 $0.42FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – +40.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – +95.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2024 $105.13MFY2026 $364.64MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -13.5%FY2026 +26.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +34.9% +5.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNTNEXODBLSH
Held by institutions 9.3% 10.8% 32.8%
Institutions holding 68 32 176
Change in shares held, QoQ +70.5% +3.3% +7.8%
Institutions buying 60 21 87
Institutions selling 5 7 70
Buyers to sellers 12.00 3.00 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTNEXODBLSH
CNTN 1.00 0.30 0.28
EXOD 0.30 1.00 0.51
BLSH 0.28 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTN, EXOD and BLSH?

Bullish (BLSH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) $444.57M, Exodus Movement (EXOD) $168.66M, Bullish (BLSH) $4.30B.

Which company is growing faster?

Exodus Movement (EXOD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Exodus Movement (EXOD) -14.2%, Bullish (BLSH) -26.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Bullish (BLSH) has the highest net margin (Exodus Movement (EXOD) -79.9%, Bullish (BLSH) -0.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) returned the most: Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) -31.7%, Exodus Movement (EXOD) -77.3%, Bullish (BLSH) -45.8%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Bullish (BLSH) has been the steadiest (Canton Strategic Holdings (CNTN) 93.5%, Exodus Movement (EXOD) 103.5%, Bullish (BLSH) 73.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNTN, EXOD and BLSH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Bullish (BLSH) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.