CNTM vs SPWR vs TAAG Stock Comparison

ConnectM Technology Solutions, SunPower and Awareness Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SPWR SunPower Inc.
$0.24 -22.6% 1M -88.2% 1Y
Market cap
$35.64M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$283.12M
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials
2 wins
TAAG Awareness Group, Inc.
$0.01 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$584.09K
P/E
1.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.41M
Div. yield
–
Consumer Lending Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Awareness leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Awareness 3, SunPower 2, ConnectM Technology Solutions 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTMSPWRTAAGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.54M $35.64M $584.09K SPWR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.8x -3.3x 1.0x TAAG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.6% +18.6% -65.3% CNTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.3% -3.8% 10.7% TAAG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -66.9% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -38.6% -88.2% 0.0% TAAG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — -43.3%/yr –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 132.4% 104.7% 346.3% SPWR
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 24/100 54/100 CNTM

Percentile Scorecard

CNTMSPWRTAAG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTMSPWRTAAG
Valuation 82 #23 of 124 16 #44 of 52 80 #34 of 169
Growth 71 #34 of 113 61 #15 of 37 47 #85 of 160
Profitability 56 #49 of 109 17 #31 of 37 73 #41 of 149
Financial Health 12 #112 of 127 4 #55 of 57 14 #136 of 158
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 55 24 54
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SPWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services
  • TAAG ranked among 174 companies in Lending and Credit

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTMSPWRTAAGSPY
1 month -13.9%-22.6%0.0% -0.2%
3 months -28.3%-17.2%0.0% +3.9%
6 months -31.0%-73.3%0.0% +8.2%
Year to date -65.5%-84.7%-50.0% +12.9%
1 year -38.6%-88.2%0.0% +12.3%
3 years -98.7%-77.8%-95.0% +87.4%
3 years, per year -76.4%-39.5%-63.2% +23.3%
5 years ——-94.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year ——-43.3% +10.9%
10 years ——-98.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——-32.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCNTMSPWRTAAGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 132.4%104.7%346.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 132.1%112.6%899.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.072.312.76 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.29-0.840.00 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-97.9%-99.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.8%-88.2%-80.0% -1.2%
52-week high $16.00$2.04$0.05 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$0.22$0.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTMSPWRTAAG
P/E now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 38.6x -3.4xmedian 26.7x 1.0xmedian 11.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 4.4x 0.1xmedian 0.8x 0.1xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x —median 13.1x —median 13.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 29.4x -0.6xmedian 23.0x 0.0xmedian 7.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 3.3x -1.4xmedian 2.4x -0.7xmedian 0.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 1.28 -0.05median 0.57 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTMSPWRTAAG
Revenue $36.02M $283.12M $5.41M
Gross profit $11.16M $147.70M $2.73M
Operating income -$12.45M -$56.94M $1.51M
Net income $2.42M -$10.73M $1.32M
Free cash flow – -$60.46M $17.35M
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-0.06 $0.01
Cash & equivalents $2.39M $4.10M $217.29K
Total debt $56.72M $105.58M –
Shares (diluted) 72.32M 185.22M 59.61M
Enterprise value $14.54M $7.35M $289.71K

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTMSPWRTAAG
P/E 10.9x -3.4x 1.0x
P/FCF – -0.6x 0.0x
P/Operating cash flow – -0.6x -2.7x
P/S 0.7x 0.1x 0.1x
P/B 1.6x -1.4x -0.7x
P/Tangible book 1.8x -0.5x -0.7x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -3.2x -2.4x 0.2x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 0.5x 0.1x
EV/FCF – -2.3x 0.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – -2.3x -1.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 -0.05 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTMSPWRTAAG
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.6% 18.6% -65.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.0% 65.5% -66.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.9% 11.2% -77.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -62.4% -52.1% 80.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 108.3% 79.9% -81.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.4% 24.9% 89.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 106.0% 91.2% -91.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 61.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -11.8% 69.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -64.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -11.8% 2,159%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 613.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTMSPWRTAAG
Gross margin 31.0% 52.2% 50.5%
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin -34.6% -20.1% 27.9%
Pretax margin -41.0% -3.0% 24.2%
Net margin 6.3% -3.8% 10.7%
FCF margin – -21.4% 320.6%
Operating cash flow margin – -21.4% -4.0%
Return on equity 27.8% – –
Return on assets 5.4% -4.2% 4.2%
Return on invested capital – -66.9% –
Return on capital employed -149.0% -48.7% 8.0%
Asset turnover 0.8x 1.1x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 5.6x -0.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTMSPWRTAAG
Debt / assets 31.1% 42.2% –
Debt / equity 1.0x -4.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – -1.7x –
Liabilities / assets 70.1% 110.5% 102.6%
Equity / assets 29.9% -10.5% -2.6%
Interest coverage -7.6x -2.0x –
Current ratio 0.2x 0.8x 0.3x
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.0x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -1.83 -2.15 -0.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTMSPWRTAAG
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTMSPWRTAAG
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.87FY2026 $-0.10FY2026 –
Revenue, next fiscal year $76.76MFY2026 $242.08MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +114.2%FY2026 -21.6%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% +31.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNTMSPWRTAAG
Held by institutions – 18.7% –
Institutions holding – 75 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – -5.4% –
Institutions buying – 42 –
Institutions selling – 20 –
Buyers to sellers – 2.10 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTMSPWRTAAG
CNTM 1.00 -0.08 0.04
SPWR -0.08 1.00 0.07
TAAG 0.04 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTM, SPWR and TAAG?

SunPower (SPWR) is the largest by market capitalisation: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $24.54M, SunPower (SPWR) $35.64M, Awareness (TAAG) $584.09K.

Which stock is cheaper, CNTM, SPWR and TAAG?

Awareness (TAAG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 10.8x, SunPower (SPWR) -3.3x, Awareness (TAAG) 1.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) +23.6%, SunPower (SPWR) +18.6%, Awareness (TAAG) -65.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Awareness (TAAG) has the highest net margin (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 6.3%, SunPower (SPWR) -3.8%, Awareness (TAAG) 10.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Awareness (TAAG) returned the most: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -38.6%, SunPower (SPWR) -88.2%, Awareness (TAAG) 0.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, SunPower (SPWR) has been the steadiest (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.4%, SunPower (SPWR) 104.7%, Awareness (TAAG) 346.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNTM, SPWR and TAAG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Awareness (TAAG) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.