CNTM vs SOUN vs SPWR Stock Comparison

ConnectM Technology Solutions, Soundhound Ai and SunPower Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SOUN Soundhound Ai, Inc.
$4.44 -23.8% 1M -74.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.88B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$203.20M
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
3 wins
SPWR SunPower Inc.
$0.24 -20.0% 1M -87.6% 1Y
Market cap
$36.04M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$283.12M
Div. yield
–
Solar Installers Industrials

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Soundhound Ai leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Soundhound Ai 3, ConnectM Technology Solutions 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTMSOUNSPWRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.45M $1.88B $36.04M SOUN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.9x -13.7x -3.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.6% +54.6% +18.6% SOUN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.3% -67.5% -3.8% CNTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -66.9% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -37.2% -74.9% -87.6% CNTM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — — — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 132.3% 68.8% 104.6% SOUN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 37/100 24/100 CNTM

Percentile Scorecard

CNTMSOUNSPWR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTMSOUNSPWR
Valuation 85 #20 of 124 20 #99 of 124 18 #43 of 52
Growth 71 #33 of 113 61 #45 of 113 58 #16 of 37
Profitability 56 #49 of 109 26 #81 of 109 17 #31 of 37
Financial Health 14 #110 of 127 67 #43 of 127 4 #55 of 57
Shareholder Returns – 13 #55 of 63 –
Overall 56 37 24
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SOUN ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • SPWR ranked among 57 companies in Construction Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTMSOUNSPWRSPY
1 month -18.2%-23.8%-20.0% +0.9%
3 months -24.4%-22.1%-20.0% +5.9%
6 months -36.4%-42.4%-71.1% +8.5%
Year to date -65.7%-55.5%-84.7% +13.3%
1 year -37.2%-74.9%-87.6% +12.4%
3 years -98.7%+182.8%-77.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year -76.5%+41.4%-39.5% +23.5%

Risk

MeasureCNTMSOUNSPWRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 132.3%68.8%104.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 132.0%64.0%112.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.073.002.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.28-1.09-0.84 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-93.5%-97.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.9%-75.5%-88.2% -0.9%
52-week high $16.00$18.15$2.04 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$4.24$0.22 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTMSOUNSPWR
P/E now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 37.9x -13.9xmedian 37.9x -3.4xmedian 27.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 4.4x 8.8xmedian 4.4x 0.1xmedian 0.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x -16.4xmedian 34.5x —median 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 26.6x -12.6xmedian 26.6x -0.6xmedian 23.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 3.4x 3.7xmedian 3.4x -1.4xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 1.24 -0.68median 1.24 -0.05median 0.57

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTMSOUNSPWR
Revenue $36.02M $203.20M $283.12M
Gross profit $11.16M $85.94M $147.70M
Operating income -$12.45M -$139.29M -$56.94M
Net income $2.42M -$137.06M -$10.73M
Free cash flow – -$142.38M -$60.46M
R&D – $101.02M –
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-0.31 $-0.06
Cash & equivalents $2.39M $202.80M $4.10M
Total debt $56.72M – $105.58M
Shares (diluted) 72.32M 438.65M 185.22M
Enterprise value $15.45M $947.66M $7.75M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUNSPWR
P/E 10.9x -13.9x -3.4x
P/FCF – -12.6x -0.6x
P/Operating cash flow – -15.6x -0.6x
P/S 0.7x 8.8x 0.1x
P/B 1.6x 3.7x -1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 6.0x -0.5x
EV/EBITDA – -16.4x –
EV/EBIT -3.2x -11.4x -2.4x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 7.8x 0.5x
EV/FCF – -11.2x -2.3x
EV/Operating cash flow – -13.9x -2.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 -0.68 -0.05

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUNSPWR
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.6% 54.6% 18.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 77.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.0% 61.4% 65.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 47.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.9% 42.2% 11.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -62.4% -12.5% -52.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 108.3% 39.1% 79.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.4% -7.1% 24.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 106.0% 44.4% 91.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.7% 20.6% 61.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -2.1% -11.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -12.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -26.2% -11.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -20.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUNSPWR
Gross margin 31.0% 42.3% 52.2%
EBITDA margin – -47.7% –
Operating margin -34.6% -68.5% -20.1%
Pretax margin -41.0% -64.7% -3.0%
Net margin 6.3% -67.5% -3.8%
FCF margin – -70.1% -21.4%
Operating cash flow margin – -56.4% -21.4%
Return on equity 27.8% -28.8% –
Return on assets 5.4% -20.9% -4.2%
Return on invested capital – – -66.9%
Return on capital employed -149.0% -23.8% -48.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.3x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 0.8x 5.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 38.7% 3.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUNSPWR
Debt / assets 31.1% – 42.2%
Debt / equity 1.0x – -4.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – -1.7x
Liabilities / assets 70.1% 26.6% 110.5%
Equity / assets 29.9% 73.4% -10.5%
Interest coverage -7.6x -350.0x -2.0x
Current ratio 0.2x 3.9x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.1x 3.6x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 2.9x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -1.83 3.89 -2.15

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTMSOUNSPWR
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -10.4% –
Shareholder yield – -10.4% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTMSOUNSPWR
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.87FY2026 $-0.43FY2026 $-0.10FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $76.76MFY2026 $225.08MFY2026 $242.08MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +114.2%FY2026 +33.2%FY2026 -21.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% +56.2% +31.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNTMSOUNSPWR
Held by institutions – 39.0% 18.7%
Institutions holding – 441 75
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.7% -5.4%
Institutions buying – 229 42
Institutions selling – 121 20
Buyers to sellers – 1.89 2.10

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTMSOUNSPWR
CNTM 1.00 0.00 -0.08
SOUN 0.00 1.00 0.28
SPWR -0.08 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTM, SOUN and SPWR?

Soundhound Ai (SOUN) is the largest by market capitalisation: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $25.45M, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) $1.88B, SunPower (SPWR) $36.04M.

Which company is growing faster?

Soundhound Ai (SOUN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) +23.6%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) +54.6%, SunPower (SPWR) +18.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has the highest net margin (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 6.3%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) -67.5%, SunPower (SPWR) -3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) returned the most: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -37.2%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) -74.9%, SunPower (SPWR) -87.6%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) has been the steadiest (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.3%, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) 68.8%, SunPower (SPWR) 104.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNTM, SOUN and SPWR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Soundhound Ai (SOUN) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.