CNTM vs GLAI vs JFU Stock Comparison

ConnectM Technology Solutions, Global AI and 9F Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLAI Global AI, Inc.
$0.95 +18.7% 1M +115.9% 1Y
Market cap
$147.15M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$184.28K
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
4 wins
JFU 9F Inc.
$2.70 -3.2% 1M -45.1% 1Y
Market cap
$63.58M
P/E
2.5x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Global AI leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Global AI 4, 9F 2, ConnectM Technology Solutions 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTMGLAIJFULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $25.45M $147.15M $63.58M GLAI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.9x -92.6x 2.5x JFU
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.6% +34.5% — GLAI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.3% -862.3% — CNTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -37.2% +115.9% -45.1% GLAI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +54.0%/yr -38.1%/yr GLAI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 132.3% 254.1% 111.6% JFU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 14/100 — CNTM

Percentile Scorecard

CNTMGLAIJFU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTMGLAIJFU
Valuation 85 #20 of 124 27 #91 of 124 99 #2 of 124
Growth 71 #33 of 113 14 #97 of 113 –
Profitability 56 #49 of 109 7 #102 of 109 –
Financial Health 14 #110 of 127 9 #116 of 127 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 56 14 –
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GLAI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • JFU ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTMGLAIJFUSPY
1 month -18.2%+18.7%-3.2% +0.9%
3 months -24.4%0.0%+34.3% +5.9%
6 months -36.4%+35.7%-14.0% +8.5%
Year to date -65.7%-5.9%-57.7% +13.3%
1 year -37.2%+115.9%-45.1% +12.4%
3 years -98.7%+295.8%-10.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year -76.5%+58.2%-3.5% +23.5%
5 years —+763.6%-90.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+54.0%-38.1% +11.0%
10 years —+216.7%— +263.4%
10 years, per year —+12.2%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCNTMGLAIJFUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 132.3%254.1%111.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 132.0%306.4%111.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.07-1.151.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.280.46-0.40 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-92.9%-96.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.9%-77.1%-68.0% -0.9%
52-week high $16.00$4.15$8.44 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$0.35$2.00 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTMGLAIJFU
P/E now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 37.9x -92.6xmedian 37.9x 2.5xmedian 37.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 4.4x 798.5xmedian 4.4x 3.3xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x -94.4xmedian 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 26.6x -83.8xmedian 26.6x 2.2xmedian 26.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 3.4x -43.3xmedian 3.4x 0.1xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 1.24 0.36median 1.24 —median 1.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTMGLAIJFU
Revenue $36.02M $184.28K –
Gross profit $11.16M $83.10K –
Operating income -$12.45M -$1.59M –
Net income $2.42M -$1.59M –
Free cash flow – -$1.76M –
R&D – $1.82M –
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-0.01 –
Cash & equivalents $2.39M $40.56K $62.11M
Total debt $56.72M – –
Shares (diluted) 72.32M 309.80M 11.80M
Enterprise value $15.45M $146.90M -$321.58M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTMGLAIJFU
P/E 10.9x -92.6x 2.5x
P/FCF – -83.8x 2.2x
P/Operating cash flow – -88.9x –
P/S 0.7x 798.5x 3.3x
P/B 1.6x -43.3x 0.1x
P/Tangible book 1.8x -19.7x 0.1x
EV/EBITDA – -94.4x –
EV/EBIT -3.2x -92.6x –
EV/Revenue 1.1x 798.3x –
EV/FCF – -83.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow – -88.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 0.36 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTMGLAIJFU
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.6% 34.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 44.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.0% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.9% -1.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -62.4% -555.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 108.3% 2.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.4% -405.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 106.0% 51.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.7% -255.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – -96.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -529.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – -103.9% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -542.3% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTMGLAIJFU
Gross margin 31.0% 45.1% –
EBITDA margin – -845.7% –
Operating margin -34.6% -862.3% –
Pretax margin -41.0% -859.5% –
Net margin 6.3% -862.3% –
FCF margin – -952.7% –
Operating cash flow margin – -898.6% –
Return on equity 27.8% – –
Return on assets 5.4% -36.9% –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed -149.0% – –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.0x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.0x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTMGLAIJFU
Debt / assets 31.1% – –
Debt / equity 1.0x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 70.1% 176.0% 12.3%
Equity / assets 29.9% -76.0% 87.7%
Interest coverage -7.6x – –
Current ratio 0.2x 0.0x –
Quick ratio 0.1x 0.0x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x –
Altman Z-score -1.83 5.87 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTMGLAIJFU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTMGLAIJFU
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.87FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $76.76MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +114.2%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTMGLAIJFU
CNTM 1.00 -0.02 -0.11
GLAI -0.02 1.00 0.01
JFU -0.11 0.01 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTM, GLAI and JFU?

Global AI (GLAI) is the largest by market capitalisation: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $25.45M, Global AI (GLAI) $147.15M, 9F (JFU) $63.58M.

Which stock is cheaper, CNTM, GLAI and JFU?

9F (JFU) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 10.9x, Global AI (GLAI) -92.6x, 9F (JFU) 2.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Global AI (GLAI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) +23.6%, Global AI (GLAI) +34.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has the highest net margin (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 6.3%, Global AI (GLAI) -862.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Global AI (GLAI) returned the most: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -37.2%, Global AI (GLAI) +115.9%, 9F (JFU) -45.1%. Over five years, Global AI (GLAI) compounded fastest (Global AI (GLAI) +54.0%/yr, 9F (JFU) -38.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 9F (JFU) has been the steadiest (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.3%, Global AI (GLAI) 254.1%, 9F (JFU) 111.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNTM, GLAI and JFU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Global AI (GLAI) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.