CNTM vs BIDU vs MFI Stock Comparison

ConnectM Technology Solutions, Baidu and mF International Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
BIDU Baidu, Inc.
$78.27 -10.4% 1M -39.2% 1Y
Market cap
$2.73B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$18.33B
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology
3 wins
MFI mF International Ltd
$8.39 -12.6% 1M -70.0% 1Y
Market cap
$45.16M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
AI Platforms Technology

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Baidu leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Baidu 3, ConnectM Technology Solutions 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNTMBIDUMFILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $24.54M $2.73B $45.16M BIDU
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 10.8x -5.7x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.4x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.6% -0.9% — CNTM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.3% -2.6% — CNTM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -2.0% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -38.6% -39.2% -70.0% CNTM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -14.2%/yr — –
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 132.4% 47.1% 119.8% BIDU
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 55/100 — BIDU

Percentile Scorecard

CNTMBIDUMFI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNTMBIDUMFI
Valuation 82 #23 of 124 92 #11 of 124 –
Growth 71 #34 of 113 19 #92 of 113 –
Profitability 56 #49 of 109 55 #50 of 109 –
Financial Health 12 #112 of 127 56 #56 of 127 100 #1 of 127
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 55 55 –
  • CNTM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • BIDU ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • MFI ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNTMBIDUMFISPY
1 month -13.9%-10.4%-12.6% -0.2%
3 months -28.3%-25.4%+1.1% +3.9%
6 months -31.0%-37.8%-22.3% +8.2%
Year to date -65.5%-40.1%-54.8% +12.9%
1 year -38.6%-39.2%-70.0% +12.3%
3 years -98.7%-26.9%— +87.4%
3 years, per year -76.4%-9.9%— +23.3%
5 years —-53.6%— +67.9%
5 years, per year —-14.2%— +10.9%
10 years —-55.3%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —-7.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCNTMBIDUMFISPY
Volatility, 1Y 132.4%47.1%119.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 132.1%45.0%123.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.071.661.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.29-0.83-0.58 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -100.0%-55.3%-95.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -71.8%-51.8%-70.4% -1.2%
52-week high $16.00$162.52$28.38 $779.14
52-week low $3.90$77.20$6.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNTMBIDUMFI
P/E now vs peer median 10.9xmedian 38.6x -5.6xmedian 38.6x —median 38.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 4.4x 1.5xmedian 4.4x —median 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 34.5x —median 34.5x —median 34.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 29.4x 5.6xmedian 29.4x —median 29.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 3.3x 0.6xmedian 3.3x 0.2xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.41median 1.28 0.10median 1.28 —median 1.28

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNTMBIDUMFI
Revenue $36.02M $18.33B –
Gross profit $11.16M $1.81B –
Operating income -$12.45M -$999.00M –
Net income $2.42M -$543.00M –
Free cash flow – $4.78B –
R&D – $2.84B –
EPS (diluted) $0.03 $-11.24 –
Cash & equivalents $2.39M $3.61B $29.02M
Total debt $56.72M $10.97B $4.09M
Shares (diluted) 72.32M 42.88M 5.81M
Enterprise value $14.54M -$72.73B -$36.95M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNTMBIDUMFI
P/E 10.9x -5.6x –
P/FCF – 5.6x –
P/Operating cash flow – 18.0x –
P/S 0.7x 1.5x –
P/B 1.6x 0.6x 0.2x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 0.7x 0.2x
EV/EBITDA – – –
EV/EBIT -3.2x -13.1x –
EV/Revenue 1.1x 0.7x –
EV/FCF – 2.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 8.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.41 0.10 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNTMBIDUMFI
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.6% -0.9% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -0.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 35.0% 12,345% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -36.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 19.9% -140.6% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -62.4% -32.9% –
Net income growth (1Y) 108.3% -114.0% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 31.4% -30.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 106.0% -201.2% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.7% -55.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 2,449% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -31.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 236.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -6.5% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNTMBIDUMFI
Gross margin 31.0% 9.9% –
EBITDA margin – – –
Operating margin -34.6% -5.5% –
Pretax margin -41.0% -2.3% –
Net margin 6.3% -2.6% –
FCF margin – 26.1% –
Operating cash flow margin – 8.1% –
Return on equity 27.8% -1.3% –
Return on assets 5.4% -0.8% –
Return on invested capital – -2.0% –
Return on capital employed -149.0% -1.8% –
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.3x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – -2.7x –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNTMBIDUMFI
Debt / assets 31.1% 15.8% 0.0%
Debt / equity 1.0x 0.3x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – 2.3x –
Liabilities / assets 70.1% 40.1% 0.4%
Equity / assets 29.9% 59.9% 99.6%
Interest coverage -7.6x -2.7x –
Current ratio 0.2x 2.3x 254.0x
Quick ratio 0.1x 2.0x 51.9x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.9x 51.9x
Altman Z-score -1.83 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNTMBIDUMFI
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNTMBIDUMFI
Forward P/E – 14.4xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.87FY2026 $5.42FY2026 $-0.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -29.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +21.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $76.76MFY2026 $19.51BFY2026 $5.85MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +114.2%FY2026 +5.7%FY2026 +44.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% -0.6% +2.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNTMBIDUMFI
Held by institutions – 17.5% –
Institutions holding – 490 –
Change in shares held, QoQ – +8.1% –
Institutions buying – 236 –
Institutions selling – 144 –
Buyers to sellers – 1.64 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNTMBIDUMFI
CNTM 1.00 -0.04 0.03
BIDU -0.04 1.00 0.08
MFI 0.03 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNTM, BIDU and MFI?

Baidu (BIDU) is the largest by market capitalisation: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) $24.54M, Baidu (BIDU) $2.73B, mF International (MFI) $45.16M.

Which company is growing faster?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) +23.6%, Baidu (BIDU) -0.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) has the highest net margin (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 6.3%, Baidu (BIDU) -2.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) returned the most: ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) -38.6%, Baidu (BIDU) -39.2%, mF International (MFI) -70.0%. Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Baidu (BIDU) has been the steadiest (ConnectM Technology Solutions (CNTM) 132.4%, Baidu (BIDU) 47.1%, mF International (MFI) 119.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNTM, BIDU and MFI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Baidu (BIDU) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.