CNQ vs SOBO vs BTE Stock Comparison

Canadian Natural Resources, South Bow and Baytex Energy Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CNQ CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES Ltd
$55.10 +16.2% 1M +76.2% 1Y
Market cap
$114.69B
P/E
14.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$33.47B
Div. yield
5.64%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
7 wins
SOBO South Bow Corp
$35.67 +5.0% 1M +36.5% 1Y
Market cap
$7.43B
P/E
16.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.00B
Div. yield
5.61%
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
1 win
BTE Baytex Energy Corp.
$5.53 +22.1% 1M +131.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.23B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.74B
Div. yield
1.45%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Canadian Natural Resources leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Canadian Natural Resources 7, Baytex Energy 3, South Bow 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNQSOBOBTELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $114.69B $7.43B $4.23B CNQ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.3x 16.1x -8.3x CNQ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.5x 19.0x 12.0x CNQ
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.7% -2.1% +280.5% BTE
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.0% 23.0% -29.5% CNQ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 9.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 4.4x -0.8x BTE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 5.64% 5.61% 1.45% CNQ
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +76.2% +36.5% +131.4% BTE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.0%/yr — +11.1%/yr CNQ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.0% 22.8% 42.3% SOBO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 77/100 49/100 61/100 CNQ

Percentile Scorecard

CNQSOBOBTE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNQSOBOBTE
Valuation 67 #17 of 49 64 #5 of 12 69 #16 of 49
Growth 89 #6 of 48 80 #3 of 11 38 #30 of 48
Profitability 89 #6 of 46 60 #5 of 11 64 #17 of 46
Financial Health 90 #6 of 52 27 #9 of 12 88 #7 of 52
Shareholder Returns 52 #17 of 34 14 #7 of 8 46 #19 of 34
Overall 77 49 61
  • CNQ ranked among 52 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • SOBO ranked among 12 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • BTE ranked among 52 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNQSOBOBTESPY
1 month +16.2%+5.0%+22.1% -0.8%
3 months +23.0%-4.5%+33.6% +3.5%
6 months +22.4%+11.1%+16.7% +7.0%
Year to date +62.8%+29.9%+71.2% +12.2%
1 year +76.2%+36.5%+131.4% +13.0%
3 years +73.7%—+27.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year +20.2%—+8.4% +23.1%
5 years +170.0%—+69.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +22.0%—+11.1% +11.0%
10 years +245.5%—+38.3% +258.0%
10 years, per year +13.2%—+3.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCNQSOBOBTESPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.0%22.8%42.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.6%22.2%44.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.50-0.20-0.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.461.603.11 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.9%-20.2%-79.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-7.8%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $55.10$38.69$5.53 $779.14
52-week low $30.59$25.26$2.27 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNQSOBOBTE
P/E now vs peer median 14.3xmedian 14.1x 16.1xmedian 17.3x -8.3xmedian 14.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.3x 3.7xmedian 3.5x 2.4xmedian 2.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 4.9x 10.9xmedian 10.9x 6.7xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 8.1x 11.6xmedian 13.6x 1.5xmedian 8.1x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.5x 2.8xmedian 2.1x —median 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.27median 1.20 —median 1.88 0.22median 1.20

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNQSOBOBTE
Revenue $33.47B $2.00B $1.74B
Gross profit $26.58B $1.72B –
Operating income $24.77B – –
Net income $8.48B $460.00M -$513.91M
Free cash flow $18.68B $640.00M $2.82B
R&D – – $4.64M
EPS (diluted) $3.83 $2.20 $-0.67
Cash & equivalents $1.84B $726.00M $506.96M
Total debt $49.14B $5.73B $1.49B
Shares (diluted) 2.10B 208.80M 769.18M
Enterprise value $111.70B $5.05B $2.48B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNQSOBOBTE
P/E 14.3x 16.1x -8.3x
P/FCF 6.1x 11.6x 1.5x
P/Operating cash flow 8.9x 8.9x 5.6x
P/S 3.4x 3.7x 2.4x
P/B – 2.8x –
P/Tangible book – 2.8x –
EV/EBITDA 3.9x 10.9x 6.7x
EV/EBIT 5.0x 14.0x -57.1x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 6.2x 2.2x
EV/FCF 6.7x 19.4x 1.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.7x 14.8x 5.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.27 – 0.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNQSOBOBTE
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.7% -2.1% 280.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.3% – -2.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.0% 1.5% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.2% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -26.5% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.2% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 42.1% 53.3% -293.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.2% – -34.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 408,311% 134.7% -302.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 53.8% – -37.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.3% 30.1% -41.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.4% – 5.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 33.0% 14.9% 128.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.6% – 130.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNQSOBOBTE
Gross margin 79.4% 85.8% –
EBITDA margin 94.6% 56.9% 32.6%
Operating margin 74.0% – –
Pretax margin 32.2% 27.8% -12.2%
Net margin 24.0% 23.0% -29.5%
FCF margin 55.8% 32.0% 161.9%
Operating cash flow margin 38.5% 41.9% 43.8%
Return on equity – 17.3% –
Return on assets – 4.1% –
Return on invested capital – 9.2% –
Return on capital employed – 9.1% –
Asset turnover – 0.2x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.8x -1.5x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNQSOBOBTE
Debt / assets – 50.4% –
Debt / equity – 2.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 4.4x -0.8x
Debt / FCF 0.6x 9.0x 0.0x
Liabilities / assets – 76.6% –
Equity / assets – 23.4% –
Interest coverage 38.3x 2.7x -0.5x
Current ratio – 1.5x –
Quick ratio – 1.2x –
Cash ratio – 0.5x –
Altman Z-score – 1.03 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNQSOBOBTE
Dividend yield 5.6% 5.6% 1.4%
Net buyback yield -0.3% -0.1% -4.6%
Shareholder yield 5.4% 5.5% -3.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) 42.5% – -14.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) 19.3% – 2.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) -8.3% – 39.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -111.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNQSOBOBTE
Forward P/E 11.5xFY2026 19.0xFY2026 12.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.79FY2026 $1.88FY2026 $0.46FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +84.9%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after -15.9% +4.8% +19.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $38.12BFY2026 $2.07BFY2026 $1.44BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +34.8%FY2026 +4.1%FY2026 -44.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.5% +3.7% -13.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNQSOBOBTE
Held by institutions 71.6% 62.0% 51.4%
Institutions holding 745 305 186
Change in shares held, QoQ -5.0% -2.3% +5.1%
Institutions buying 386 126 98
Institutions selling 242 92 62
Buyers to sellers 1.60 1.37 1.58

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNQSOBOBTE
CNQ 1.00 0.50 0.70
SOBO 0.50 1.00 0.38
BTE 0.70 0.38 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNQ, SOBO and BTE?

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) $114.69B, South Bow (SOBO) $7.43B, Baytex Energy (BTE) $4.23B.

Which stock is cheaper, CNQ, SOBO and BTE?

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 14.3x, South Bow (SOBO) 16.1x, Baytex Energy (BTE) -8.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) is cheapest (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 11.5x, South Bow (SOBO) 19.0x, Baytex Energy (BTE) 12.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Baytex Energy (BTE) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) +6.7%, South Bow (SOBO) -2.1%, Baytex Energy (BTE) +280.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) has the highest net margin (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 24.0%, South Bow (SOBO) 23.0%, Baytex Energy (BTE) -29.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Baytex Energy (BTE) returned the most: Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) +76.2%, South Bow (SOBO) +36.5%, Baytex Energy (BTE) +131.4%. Over five years, Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) compounded fastest (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) +22.0%/yr, Baytex Energy (BTE) +11.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) has the highest dividend yield: Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 5.64%, South Bow (SOBO) 5.61%, Baytex Energy (BTE) 1.45%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, South Bow (SOBO) has been the steadiest (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 31.0%, South Bow (SOBO) 22.8%, Baytex Energy (BTE) 42.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNQ, SOBO and BTE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.