CNQ vs MTDR vs APA Stock Comparison

Canadian Natural Resources, Matador Resources and Apa Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CNQ CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES Ltd
$54.07 +14.0% 1M +71.7% 1Y
Market cap
$115.63B
P/E
14.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$33.47B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
7 wins
MTDR Matador Resources Co
$59.25 +15.0% 1M +50.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.49B
P/E
10.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.92B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
3 wins
APA APA Corp
$50.79 +18.8% 1M +117.6% 1Y
Market cap
$18.30B
P/E
10.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.61B
Div. yield
0.02%
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Canadian Natural Resources leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Canadian Natural Resources 7, Matador Resources 3, Apa 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNQMTDRAPALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $115.63B $7.49B $18.30B CNQ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 14.4x 10.3x 10.9x MTDR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 11.3x 6.9x 7.7x MTDR
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.7% +2.8% -16.1% CNQ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 24.0% 18.5% 19.5% CNQ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 13.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 0.8x 0.7x CNQ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield -0.03% 0.02% 0.02% MTDR
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +71.7% +50.3% +117.6% APA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +20.8%/yr +7.0%/yr +13.4%/yr CNQ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.0% 40.9% 43.9% CNQ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 76/100 66/100 73/100 CNQ

Percentile Scorecard

CNQMTDRAPA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNQMTDRAPA
Valuation 78 #23 of 99 84 #17 of 99 77 #24 of 99
Growth 78 #22 of 97 52 #47 of 97 75 #25 of 97
Profitability 85 #15 of 96 77 #23 of 96 93 #8 of 96
Financial Health 94 #7 of 102 34 #68 of 102 52 #50 of 102
Shareholder Returns 43 #44 of 76 81 #15 of 76 71 #23 of 76
Overall 76 66 73
  • CNQ ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • MTDR ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • APA ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNQMTDRAPASPY
1 month +14.0%+15.0%+18.8% -0.2%
3 months +22.4%+28.5%+45.4% +3.9%
6 months +16.6%-3.1%+31.4% +8.2%
Year to date +59.7%+39.6%+107.6% +12.9%
1 year +71.7%+50.3%+117.6% +12.3%
3 years +70.4%-1.9%+26.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +19.5%-0.6%+8.2% +23.3%
5 years +157.2%+40.0%+87.6% +67.9%
5 years, per year +20.8%+7.0%+13.4% +10.9%
10 years +239.4%+162.6%-17.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year +13.0%+10.1%-1.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCNQMTDRAPASPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.0%40.9%43.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.5%41.8%42.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.51-0.79-0.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.311.232.68 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.9%-50.0%-72.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.9%-9.5%-2.1% -1.2%
52-week high $55.10$65.45$51.90 $779.14
52-week low $30.59$37.19$21.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNQMTDRAPA
P/E now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 13.0x 10.2xmedian 13.0x 10.7xmedian 13.0x
P/S now vs peer median 3.4xmedian 2.1x 1.9xmedian 2.1x 2.1xmedian 2.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 5.9x 3.8xmedian 5.9x 4.7xmedian 5.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 6.0xmedian 11.1x -19.0xmedian 11.1x 8.4xmedian 11.1x
P/B now vs peer median —median 1.5x 1.2xmedian 1.5x 2.2xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 2.27 -1.16median 2.27 -19.63median 2.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNQMTDRAPA
Revenue $33.47B $3.92B $8.61B
Gross profit $26.58B $3.69B $7.81B
Operating income $24.77B $1.17B $2.31B
Net income $8.48B $814.00M $1.98B
Free cash flow $18.68B -$385.76M $2.11B
R&D – – $142.00M
EPS (diluted) $3.83 $5.83 $4.74
Cash & equivalents $1.84B $26.32M $444.00M
Total debt $49.14B $1.85B $17.14B
Shares (diluted) 2.10B 124.16M 354.00M
Enterprise value $112.63B $7.39B $16.58B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNQMTDRAPA
P/E 14.1x 10.2x 10.7x
P/FCF 6.0x -19.0x 8.4x
P/Operating cash flow 8.7x 2.8x 3.9x
P/S 3.4x 1.9x 2.1x
P/B – 1.2x 2.2x
P/Tangible book – 1.2x 2.2x
EV/EBITDA 3.9x 3.8x 4.7x
EV/EBIT 5.0x 7.8x 9.1x
EV/Revenue 3.7x 2.3x 2.4x
EV/FCF 6.6x -23.8x 10.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.5x 3.5x 4.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 -1.16 -19.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNQMTDRAPA
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.7% 2.8% -16.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.3% 12.2% -2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.0% 1.8% -6.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -3.2% 11.6% 1.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -26.5% -18.0% 3,511%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.2% -4.8% 10.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 42.1% -14.8% 54.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.2% -6.1% 2.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 408,311% -15.0% 58.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 53.8% -8.7% -0.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.3% 7.8% -2.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.4% 13.3% 5.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 33.0% -153.0% 33.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.6% -36.2% 7.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNQMTDRAPA
Gross margin 79.4% 94.2% 90.8%
EBITDA margin 94.6% 61.5% 52.3%
Operating margin 74.0% 30.0% 26.8%
Pretax margin 32.2% 24.4% 36.1%
Net margin 24.0% 18.5% 19.5%
FCF margin 55.8% -9.9% 24.6%
Operating cash flow margin 38.5% 66.5% 52.6%
Return on equity – 13.4% 25.8%
Return on assets – 6.3% 11.0%
Return on invested capital – 13.2% –
Return on capital employed – 10.4% 14.8%
Asset turnover – 0.3x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 3.2x 2.3x
Stock comp / revenue 1.3% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNQMTDRAPA
Debt / assets – 13.7% 20.8%
Debt / equity – 0.3x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.3x 0.8x 0.7x
Debt / FCF 0.6x -4.8x 1.8x
Liabilities / assets – 53.7% 55.8%
Equity / assets – 46.3% 44.2%
Interest coverage 38.3x 5.4x 10.6x
Current ratio – 0.7x 0.9x
Quick ratio – 0.4x 0.7x
Cash ratio – 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 1.49 1.99

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNQMTDRAPA
Dividend yield 5.8% 2.6% 2.0%
Net buyback yield -0.3% 0.3% 1.3%
Shareholder yield 5.5% 2.9% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) 42.5% 21.9% 17.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) 19.3% -46.2% 16.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) -8.3% 32.7% -3.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -111.0% 17.5% 8.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNQMTDRAPA
Forward P/E 11.3xFY2026 6.9xFY2026 7.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.80FY2026 $8.58FY2026 $6.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +85.3%FY2026 +49.0%FY2026 +74.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -15.4% +10.8% -17.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $38.26BFY2026 $4.06BFY2026 $8.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +35.4%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026 -3.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.6% +26.6% -0.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNQMTDRAPA
Held by institutions 71.6% 96.8% 100.0%
Institutions holding 745 493 809
Change in shares held, QoQ -5.0% +3.2% +3.2%
Institutions buying 386 273 432
Institutions selling 242 149 244
Buyers to sellers 1.60 1.83 1.77

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNQMTDRAPA
CNQ 1.00 0.70 0.72
MTDR 0.70 1.00 0.82
APA 0.72 0.82 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNQ, MTDR and APA?

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) $115.63B, Matador Resources (MTDR) $7.49B, Apa (APA) $18.30B.

Which stock is cheaper, CNQ, MTDR and APA?

Matador Resources (MTDR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 14.4x, Matador Resources (MTDR) 10.3x, Apa (APA) 10.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Matador Resources (MTDR) is cheapest (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 11.3x, Matador Resources (MTDR) 6.9x, Apa (APA) 7.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) +6.7%, Matador Resources (MTDR) +2.8%, Apa (APA) -16.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) has the highest net margin (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 24.0%, Matador Resources (MTDR) 18.5%, Apa (APA) 19.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Apa (APA) returned the most: Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) +71.7%, Matador Resources (MTDR) +50.3%, Apa (APA) +117.6%. Over five years, Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) compounded fastest (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) +20.8%/yr, Matador Resources (MTDR) +7.0%/yr, Apa (APA) +13.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Matador Resources (MTDR) has the highest dividend yield: Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) -0.03%, Matador Resources (MTDR) 0.02%, Apa (APA) 0.02%. Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) has been the steadiest (Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) 31.0%, Matador Resources (MTDR) 40.9%, Apa (APA) 43.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNQ, MTDR and APA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.