CNDT vs MTLS vs SVMB Stock Comparison

Conduent, Materialise and Jingbo Technology Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CNDT CONDUENT Inc
$1.57 -4.3% 1M -38.7% 1Y
Market cap
$244.17M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.79B
Div. yield
–
Consulting Industrials
MTLS Materialise Nv
$8.62 +2.3% 1M +45.1% 1Y
Market cap
$509.16M
P/E
33.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$318.18M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
7 wins
SVMB Jingbo Technology, Inc.
$2.66 +166.0% 1M +26.7% 1Y
Market cap
$1.48B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.24M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Materialise leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Materialise 7, Jingbo Technology 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNDTMTLSSVMBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $244.17M $509.16M $1.48B SVMB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.1x 33.1x -245.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 43.1x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.7% +10.2% -45.7% MTLS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -8.2% 4.8% -486.2% MTLS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -186.3% 3.5% — MTLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x -2.5x -4.6x SVMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -38.7% +45.1% +26.7% MTLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.3%/yr -19.3%/yr — MTLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.5% 42.0% 129.3% MTLS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 64/100 10/100 MTLS

Percentile Scorecard

CNDTMTLSSVMB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNDTMTLSSVMB
Valuation 37 #71 of 112 86 #15 of 101 16 #85 of 101
Growth 22 #75 of 96 88 #13 of 97 5 #92 of 97
Profitability 11 #81 of 91 60 #38 of 94 2 #92 of 94
Financial Health 21 #99 of 125 80 #22 of 108 15 #92 of 108
Shareholder Returns – 8 #59 of 64 –
Overall 23 64 10
  • CNDT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • MTLS ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • SVMB ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNDTMTLSSVMBSPY
1 month -4.3%+2.3%+166.0% -0.2%
3 months -3.1%+33.9%+166.0% +3.9%
6 months -8.7%+62.6%+56.5% +8.2%
Year to date -18.2%+55.3%+23.7% +12.9%
1 year -38.7%+45.1%+26.7% +12.3%
3 years -49.4%+61.7%-99.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year -20.3%+17.4%-79.3% +23.3%
5 years -76.7%-65.8%— +67.9%
5 years, per year -25.3%-19.3%— +10.9%
10 years —+18.1%— +261.1%
10 years, per year —+1.7%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCNDTMTLSSVMBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.5%42.0%129.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.9%38.2%380.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.591.100.50 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.511.070.21 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.7%-84.7%-99.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.7%-1.5%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $2.56$8.75$2.66 $779.14
52-week low $1.16$4.80$0.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNDTMTLSSVMB
P/E now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 21.2x 33.1xmedian 28.3x -245.4xmedian 28.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.9x 1.6xmedian 2.8x 1,193xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 11.9x 10.5xmedian 17.3x -250.2xmedian 17.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.0xmedian 13.7x 31.5xmedian 15.8x -511.1xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.4x 1.7xmedian 3.2x -44.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.02median 1.00 0.11median 0.85 5.79median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNDTMTLSSVMB
Revenue $2.79B $318.18M $1.24M
Gross profit $514.00M $182.10M -$132.45K
Operating income -$2.43B $12.25M -$6.50M
Net income -$228.00M $15.39M -$6.64M
Free cash flow -$49.00M $16.15M -$2.89M
R&D $3.00M $55.71M $245.84K
EPS (diluted) $-1.47 $0.26 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $228.00M $152.75M $47.85K
Total debt $2.84B $53.39M $27.85M
Shares (diluted) 155.29M 59.07M 555.32M
Enterprise value -$692.83M -$108.25M $1.48B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNDTMTLSSVMB
P/E -1.1x 33.1x -245.4x
P/FCF -5.0x 31.5x -511.1x
P/Operating cash flow -244.2x 14.2x -551.0x
P/S 0.1x 1.6x 1,193x
P/B 0.5x 1.7x -44.7x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 1.9x -44.7x
EV/EBITDA -0.3x 10.5x -250.2x
EV/EBIT -0.3x 33.4x -231.6x
EV/Revenue 0.3x 1.3x 1,216x
EV/FCF -15.0x 25.4x -520.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -734.2x 11.4x -561.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.02 0.11 5.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNDTMTLSSVMB
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.7% 10.2% -45.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.8% 6.4% -21.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.1% 11.4% -143.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -15.1% 7.0% 42.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.8% 73.2% -71.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.9% 62.7% -11.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,240% 150.8% -283.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.7% 330.9% -9.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,283% 151.3% -431.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 310.4% -42.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 97.8% 46.9% -32.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.2% 32.9% -178.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 31.0% 340.6% -60.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -40.0% 53.8% -29.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNDTMTLSSVMB
Gross margin 18.4% 57.2% -10.7%
EBITDA margin -80.2% 12.3% -486.0%
Operating margin -87.0% 3.9% -525.0%
Pretax margin -5.4% 4.9% -535.8%
Net margin -8.2% 4.8% -486.2%
FCF margin -1.8% 5.1% -233.5%
Operating cash flow margin 0.0% 11.3% -216.6%
Return on equity -39.1% 5.3% –
Return on assets -9.8% 3.2% -87.5%
Return on invested capital -186.3% 3.5% –
Return on capital employed -150.6% 3.3% –
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x 0.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 2.3x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNDTMTLSSVMB
Debt / assets 32.0% 11.2% 373.6%
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.2x -0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x -2.5x -4.6x
Debt / FCF -14.7x 3.3x -9.6x
Liabilities / assets 76.6% 38.6% 543.0%
Equity / assets 23.4% 61.4% -443.0%
Interest coverage -49.5x 27.6x -98.6x
Current ratio 1.6x 2.4x 0.2x
Quick ratio 0.8x 2.1x 1.9x
Cash ratio 0.3x 1.5x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -3.76 2.96 9.42

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNDTMTLSSVMB
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – -21.0% –
Shareholder yield – -21.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNDTMTLSSVMB
Forward P/E – 43.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.56FY2026 $0.20FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +33.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +45.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.37BFY2026 $302.24MFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY -22.1%FY2026 -3.8%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after -0.5% +17.6% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNDTMTLSSVMB
Held by institutions 73.2% 13.7% –
Institutions holding 189 59 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +9.4% –
Institutions buying 90 23 –
Institutions selling 50 22 –
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.05 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNDTMTLSSVMB
CNDT 1.00 0.18 0.01
MTLS 0.18 1.00 0.08
SVMB 0.01 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNDT, MTLS and SVMB?

Jingbo Technology (SVMB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Conduent (CNDT) $244.17M, Materialise (MTLS) $509.16M, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) $1.48B.

Which company is growing faster?

Materialise (MTLS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Conduent (CNDT) -5.7%, Materialise (MTLS) +10.2%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -45.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Materialise (MTLS) has the highest net margin (Conduent (CNDT) -8.2%, Materialise (MTLS) 4.8%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) -486.2%). On return on invested capital, Materialise (MTLS) leads (Conduent (CNDT) -186.3%, Materialise (MTLS) 3.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Materialise (MTLS) returned the most: Conduent (CNDT) -38.7%, Materialise (MTLS) +45.1%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) +26.7%. Over five years, Materialise (MTLS) compounded fastest (Conduent (CNDT) -25.3%/yr, Materialise (MTLS) -19.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Materialise (MTLS) has been the steadiest (Conduent (CNDT) 75.5%, Materialise (MTLS) 42.0%, Jingbo Technology (SVMB) 129.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNDT, MTLS and SVMB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Materialise (MTLS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.