CNDT vs BWMN vs TTEK Stock Comparison

Conduent, Bowman Consulting and Tetra Tech Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CNDT CONDUENT Inc
$1.57 -4.3% 1M -38.7% 1Y
Market cap
$241.47M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.79B
Div. yield
–
Consulting Industrials
1 win
TTEK Tetra Tech Inc
$36.87 +8.7% 1M +10.1% 1Y
Market cap
$9.48B
P/E
21.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.07B
Div. yield
0.01%
Consulting Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Tetra Tech leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Tetra Tech 7, Bowman Consulting 3, Conduent 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCNDTBWMNTTEKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $241.47M $704.34M $9.48B TTEK
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.1x 102.3x 21.7x TTEK
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.7x 22.5x BWMN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -5.7% +14.2% -7.6% BWMN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -8.2% 1.3% 8.6% TTEK
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -186.3% 3.8% 16.7% TTEK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 4.4x 0.9x CNDT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -38.7% -1.1% +10.1% TTEK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -25.3%/yr +23.5%/yr +1.2%/yr BWMN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.5% 63.1% 37.1% TTEK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 23/100 43/100 66/100 TTEK

Percentile Scorecard

CNDTBWMNTTEK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCNDTBWMNTTEK
Valuation 37 #71 of 112 26 #83 of 112 46 #61 of 112
Growth 22 #75 of 96 81 #19 of 96 80 #20 of 96
Profitability 11 #81 of 91 39 #56 of 91 78 #21 of 91
Financial Health 21 #99 of 125 23 #97 of 125 66 #43 of 125
Shareholder Returns – 44 #38 of 67 62 #26 of 67
Overall 23 43 66
  • CNDT ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • BWMN ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • TTEK ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCNDTBWMNTTEKSPY
1 month -4.3%+0.7%+8.7% -0.2%
3 months -3.1%+62.1%+10.0% +3.9%
6 months -8.7%+37.9%+17.5% +8.2%
Year to date -18.2%+29.8%+9.9% +12.9%
1 year -38.7%-1.1%+10.1% +12.3%
3 years -49.4%+62.8%+27.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year -20.3%+17.7%+8.4% +23.3%
5 years -76.7%+186.6%+6.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -25.3%+23.5%+1.2% +10.9%
10 years ——+382.0% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+17.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCNDTBWMNTTEKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.5%63.1%37.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 81.9%53.5%36.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.591.500.32 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.51-0.020.27 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -83.7%-56.2%-48.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -38.7%-3.5%-13.5% -1.2%
52-week high $2.56$44.43$42.61 $779.14
52-week low $1.16$25.31$26.18 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCNDTBWMNTTEK
P/E now vs peer median -1.1xmedian 21.2x 102.4xmedian 21.2x 21.8xmedian 21.2x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.9x 1.4xmedian 0.9x 1.9xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -0.3xmedian 11.9x 19.3xmedian 11.9x 15.0xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.0xmedian 13.7x 58.8xmedian 13.7x 17.2xmedian 13.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.4x 2.9xmedian 2.4x 5.1xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median -1.02median 1.00 5.89median 1.00 1.54median 1.00

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCNDTBWMNTTEK
Revenue $2.79B $527.60M $5.07B
Gross profit $514.00M $281.51M $951.81M
Operating income -$2.43B $17.72M $611.75M
Net income -$228.00M $7.38M $436.70M
Free cash flow -$49.00M $12.56M $547.33M
R&D $3.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $-1.47 $0.41 $1.68
Cash & equivalents $228.00M $10.49M $230.84M
Total debt $2.84B $759.87M $801.06M
Shares (diluted) 155.29M 16.60M 259.78M
Enterprise value -$695.53M $654.52M $8.59B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCNDTBWMNTTEK
P/E -1.1x 102.4x 21.8x
P/FCF -5.0x 58.8x 17.2x
P/Operating cash flow -244.2x 31.8x 16.6x
P/S 0.1x 1.4x 1.9x
P/B 0.5x 2.9x 5.1x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 4.3x 5.5x
EV/EBITDA -0.3x 19.3x 15.0x
EV/EBIT -0.3x 53.8x 16.4x
EV/Revenue 0.3x 1.8x 2.0x
EV/FCF -15.0x 76.0x 18.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -734.2x 41.0x 17.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.02 5.89 1.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCNDTBWMNTTEK
Revenue growth (1Y) -5.7% 14.2% -7.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.8% 19.9% 6.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -4.1% 15.6% 2.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -15.1% 21.4% 12.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.8% 47.3% 65.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.9% 76.6% 21.0%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,240% -32.6% 101.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 11.7% 25.1% 13.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,283% -33.6% 105.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 17.4% 14.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 97.8% -33.6% 22.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.2% 49.4% 22.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 31.0% -62.9% 23.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -40.0% 29.4% 24.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCNDTBWMNTTEK
Gross margin 18.4% 53.4% 18.8%
EBITDA margin -80.2% 9.3% 13.2%
Operating margin -87.0% 3.4% 12.1%
Pretax margin -5.4% 0.7% 11.7%
Net margin -8.2% 1.3% 8.6%
FCF margin -1.8% 2.4% 10.8%
Operating cash flow margin 0.0% 4.4% 11.2%
Return on equity -39.1% 2.9% 23.5%
Return on assets -9.8% 1.2% 10.0%
Return on invested capital -186.3% 3.8% 16.7%
Return on capital employed -150.6% 5.2% 20.1%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.9x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 3.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 3.5% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCNDTBWMNTTEK
Debt / assets 32.0% 36.4% 18.3%
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.9x 0.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.2x 4.4x 0.9x
Debt / FCF -14.7x 18.0x 1.5x
Liabilities / assets 76.6% 58.6% 57.8%
Equity / assets 23.4% 41.4% 42.2%
Interest coverage -49.5x – 15.4x
Current ratio 1.6x 0.9x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.8x 1.2x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.0x 0.2x
Altman Z-score -3.76 2.09 4.54

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCNDTBWMNTTEK
Dividend yield – – 0.7%
Net buyback yield – 3.2% 2.7%
Shareholder yield – 3.2% 3.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 15.9%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 12.7%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 9.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 11.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCNDTBWMNTTEK
Forward P/E – 20.7xFY2026 22.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.56FY2026 $2.07FY2026 $1.64FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +23.2%FY2026 +5.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +16.4% 0.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.37BFY2026 $555.17MFY2026 $4.61BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -22.1%FY2026 +27.7%FY2026 -0.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -0.5% +10.4% -7.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCNDTBWMNTTEK
Held by institutions 73.2% 63.8% 97.8%
Institutions holding 189 136 547
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +3.1% +4.0%
Institutions buying 90 78 260
Institutions selling 50 36 210
Buyers to sellers 1.80 2.17 1.24

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CNDTBWMNTTEK
CNDT 1.00 0.11 0.28
BWMN 0.11 1.00 0.16
TTEK 0.28 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CNDT, BWMN and TTEK?

Tetra Tech (TTEK) is the largest by market capitalisation: Conduent (CNDT) $241.47M, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) $704.34M, Tetra Tech (TTEK) $9.48B.

Which stock is cheaper, CNDT, BWMN and TTEK?

Tetra Tech (TTEK) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Conduent (CNDT) -1.1x, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 102.3x, Tetra Tech (TTEK) 21.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) is cheapest (Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 20.7x, Tetra Tech (TTEK) 22.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Bowman Consulting (BWMN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Conduent (CNDT) -5.7%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) +14.2%, Tetra Tech (TTEK) -7.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tetra Tech (TTEK) has the highest net margin (Conduent (CNDT) -8.2%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 1.3%, Tetra Tech (TTEK) 8.6%). On return on invested capital, Tetra Tech (TTEK) leads (Conduent (CNDT) -186.3%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 3.8%, Tetra Tech (TTEK) 16.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Tetra Tech (TTEK) returned the most: Conduent (CNDT) -38.7%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) -1.1%, Tetra Tech (TTEK) +10.1%. Over five years, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) compounded fastest (Conduent (CNDT) -25.3%/yr, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) +23.5%/yr, Tetra Tech (TTEK) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Conduent (CNDT) 0.00%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 0.00%, Tetra Tech (TTEK) 0.01%. Conduent (CNDT) and Bowman Consulting (BWMN) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Tetra Tech (TTEK) has been the steadiest (Conduent (CNDT) 75.5%, Bowman Consulting (BWMN) 63.1%, Tetra Tech (TTEK) 37.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CNDT, BWMN and TTEK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tetra Tech (TTEK) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.