CMI vs TT vs BWA Stock Comparison

Cummins, Trane Technologies and Borgwarner Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CMI Cummins Inc
$531.67 +2.6% 1M +28.3% 1Y
Market cap
$72.03B
P/E
26.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$34.71B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
2 wins
TT Trane Technologies plc
$448.76 -0.7% 1M +5.3% 1Y
Market cap
$94.06B
P/E
31.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$22.21B
Div. yield
0.01%
HVAC Industrials
6 wins
BWA Borgwarner Inc
$55.92 -8.4% 1M +28.4% 1Y
Market cap
$11.15B
P/E
26.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.34B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Trane Technologies leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Trane Technologies 6, Borgwarner 4, Cummins 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMITTBWALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $72.03B $94.06B $11.15B TT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.5x 31.9x 26.9x CMI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.9x 28.7x 10.4x BWA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.9% +7.0% +2.2% TT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.8% 13.3% 2.9% TT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.6% 24.4% 5.0% TT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 0.8x — CMI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.01% BWA
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +28.3% +5.3% +28.4% BWA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.3%/yr +19.9%/yr +4.4%/yr TT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.1% 29.3% 40.8% TT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 51/100 61/100 BWA

Percentile Scorecard

CMITTBWA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMITTBWA
Valuation 50 #103 of 203 9 #50 of 55 92 #18 of 203
Growth 54 #88 of 188 66 #18 of 51 46 #102 of 188
Profitability 71 #54 of 184 89 #6 of 48 47 #98 of 184
Financial Health 54 #100 of 217 53 #26 of 54 47 #115 of 217
Shareholder Returns 71 #45 of 153 35 #27 of 41 75 #39 of 153
Overall 60 51 61
  • CMI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • TT ranked among 59 companies in Construction Products
  • BWA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMITTBWASPY
1 month +2.6%-0.7%-8.4% +0.9%
3 months -12.3%+0.4%-10.1% +5.9%
6 months -16.8%-6.4%+3.2% +8.5%
Year to date +4.2%+15.3%+24.1% +13.3%
1 year +28.3%+5.3%+28.4% +12.4%
3 years +147.0%+143.0%+52.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +35.2%+34.5%+15.1% +23.5%
5 years +121.7%+148.0%+24.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year +17.3%+19.9%+4.4% +11.0%
10 years +319.9%+764.0%+56.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year +15.4%+24.1%+4.6% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCMITTBWASPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.1%29.3%40.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 38.1%30.5%33.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.641.151.30 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.760.180.70 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.8%-40.3%-51.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -26.9%-10.9%-27.4% -0.9%
52-week high $727.59$503.46$77.03 $779.14
52-week low $414.30$376.43$40.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMITTBWA
P/E now vs peer median 27.0xmedian 25.4x 33.6xmedian 20.0x 27.4xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.9x 4.4xmedian 1.5x 0.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.3xmedian 14.3x 23.3xmedian 11.3x —median 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.7xmedian 21.8x 27.6xmedian 15.3x 9.4xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.2x 11.4xmedian 2.8x 2.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 8.42median 1.41 1.92median 0.99 -1.31median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMITTBWA
Revenue $34.71B $22.21B $14.34B
Gross profit $8.79B $7.86B $2.79B
Operating income $3.89B $3.98B $716.00M
Net income $2.83B $2.97B $478.00M
Free cash flow $3.37B $3.58B $1.21B
R&D $1.44B – –
EPS (diluted) $19.60 $13.25 $2.01
Cash & equivalents $3.18B $1.32B $2.45B
Total debt $7.35B $4.62B $3.87B
Shares (diluted) 138.50M 222.50M 206.30M
Enterprise value $68.10B $88.78B $2.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMITTBWA
P/E 27.0x 33.6x 27.4x
P/FCF 21.7x 27.6x 9.4x
P/Operating cash flow 15.8x 25.2x 6.6x
P/S 2.1x 4.4x 0.8x
P/B 5.3x 11.4x 2.0x
P/Tangible book 6.2x 19.3x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 15.3x 23.3x –
EV/EBIT 19.7x 25.6x 17.9x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 4.6x 0.9x
EV/FCF 22.8x 28.5x 10.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.5x 26.1x 7.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.42 1.92 -1.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMITTBWA
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.9% 7.0% 2.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.5% 9.7% 1.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.7% 4.5% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 0.7% 3.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -6.0% 4.4% 49.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 14.4% -14.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -7.8% 3.3% 81.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.9% 16.1% -21.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -7.7% 4.5% 109.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 17.5% -20.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 63.4% 19.9% 1.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.8% 28.8% 14.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 103.8% 26.1% 2.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.3% 32.3% 43.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMITTBWA
Gross margin 25.3% 35.4% 19.5%
EBITDA margin 14.4% 19.7% –
Operating margin 11.2% 17.9% 5.0%
Pretax margin 11.1% 16.8% 4.9%
Net margin 7.8% 13.3% 2.9%
FCF margin 9.7% 16.1% 8.5%
Operating cash flow margin 13.4% 17.6% 12.0%
Return on equity 20.7% 34.4% 8.4%
Return on assets 8.1% 12.7% 3.5%
Return on invested capital 13.6% 24.4% 5.0%
Return on capital employed 16.0% 26.7% 6.8%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.0x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.3x 3.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.4% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMITTBWA
Debt / assets 20.6% 19.3% 27.8%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.5x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x 0.8x –
Debt / FCF 2.2x 1.3x 3.2x
Liabilities / assets 61.0% 63.9% 58.4%
Equity / assets 39.0% 36.1% 41.6%
Interest coverage 12.1x 18.1x –
Current ratio 1.7x 1.1x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.7x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 4.55 6.00 3.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMITTBWA
Dividend yield 1.5% 0.9% 1.2%
Net buyback yield 0.6% 1.4% 5.7%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 2.3% 6.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.6% 29.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 24.6% 11.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 10.3% 45.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.6% -4.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMITTBWA
Forward P/E 16.9xFY2026 28.7xFY2026 10.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $31.39FY2026 $15.64FY2026 $5.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +31.9%FY2026 +19.8%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.7% +10.2% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $35.38BFY2026 $25.40BFY2026 $13.71BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.1%FY2026 +19.1%FY2026 -4.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.3% +7.8% +0.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMITTBWA
Held by institutions 85.4% 87.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,106 1,810 815
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% +0.3% +3.7%
Institutions buying 1,049 894 419
Institutions selling 728 579 295
Buyers to sellers 1.44 1.54 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMITTBWA
CMI 1.00 0.62 0.49
TT 0.62 1.00 0.43
BWA 0.49 0.43 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMI, TT and BWA?

Trane Technologies (TT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cummins (CMI) $72.03B, Trane Technologies (TT) $94.06B, Borgwarner (BWA) $11.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMI, TT and BWA?

Cummins (CMI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cummins (CMI) 26.5x, Trane Technologies (TT) 31.9x, Borgwarner (BWA) 26.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Borgwarner (BWA) is cheapest (Cummins (CMI) 16.9x, Trane Technologies (TT) 28.7x, Borgwarner (BWA) 10.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Trane Technologies (TT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cummins (CMI) +2.9%, Trane Technologies (TT) +7.0%, Borgwarner (BWA) +2.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Trane Technologies (TT) has the highest net margin (Cummins (CMI) 7.8%, Trane Technologies (TT) 13.3%, Borgwarner (BWA) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Trane Technologies (TT) leads (Cummins (CMI) 13.6%, Trane Technologies (TT) 24.4%, Borgwarner (BWA) 5.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Borgwarner (BWA) returned the most: Cummins (CMI) +28.3%, Trane Technologies (TT) +5.3%, Borgwarner (BWA) +28.4%. Over five years, Trane Technologies (TT) compounded fastest (Cummins (CMI) +17.3%/yr, Trane Technologies (TT) +19.9%/yr, Borgwarner (BWA) +4.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Borgwarner (BWA) has the highest dividend yield: Cummins (CMI) 0.00%, Trane Technologies (TT) 0.01%, Borgwarner (BWA) 0.01%. Cummins (CMI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Trane Technologies (TT) has been the steadiest (Cummins (CMI) 37.1%, Trane Technologies (TT) 29.3%, Borgwarner (BWA) 40.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CMI, TT and BWA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Trane Technologies (TT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.