CMI vs BWA Stock Comparison

Cummins and Borgwarner Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CMI Cummins Inc
$517.26 -1.5% 1M +23.8% 1Y
Market cap
$71.88B
P/E
26.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$34.71B
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
7 wins
BWA Borgwarner Inc
$54.94 -9.2% 1M +25.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.19B
P/E
27.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$14.34B
Div. yield
0.01%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Cummins leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Cummins 7, Borgwarner 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMIBWALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $71.88B $11.19B CMI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 26.5x 27.0x CMI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.5x 10.2x BWA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.9% +2.2% CMI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.8% 2.9% CMI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.6% 5.0% CMI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +23.8% +25.7% BWA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.5%/yr +4.0%/yr CMI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 37.1% 40.8% CMI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 63/100 BWA

Percentile Scorecard

CMIBWA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMIBWA
Valuation 51 #101 of 203 93 #16 of 203
Growth 54 #88 of 188 47 #101 of 188
Profitability 70 #56 of 187 50 #94 of 187
Financial Health 50 #111 of 222 46 #120 of 222
Shareholder Returns 71 #45 of 153 78 #34 of 153
Overall 59 63
  • CMI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • BWA ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMIBWASPY
1 month -1.5%-9.2% -1.0%
3 months -22.1%-14.7% +2.9%
6 months -21.7%-2.4% +6.4%
Year to date +1.3%+21.9% +11.4%
1 year +23.8%+25.7% +13.1%
3 years +136.0%+43.1% +79.4%
3 years, per year +33.2%+12.7% +21.5%
5 years +114.9%+21.9% +67.7%
5 years, per year +16.5%+4.0% +10.9%
10 years +308.4%+57.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year +15.1%+4.7% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCMIBWASPY
Volatility, 1Y 37.1%40.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.8%33.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.621.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.640.63 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.8%-51.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -28.9%-28.7% -2.5%
52-week high $727.59$77.03 $779.14
52-week low $414.30$40.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMIBWA
P/E now vs peer median 26.3xmedian 25.9x 26.9xmedian 25.9x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.9x 0.8xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.9xmedian 13.7x —median 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 21.1xmedian 21.1x 9.2xmedian 21.1x
P/B now vs peer median 5.1xmedian 2.3x 1.9xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 8.19median 1.19 -1.29median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMIBWA
Revenue $34.71B $14.34B
Gross profit $8.79B $2.79B
Operating income $3.89B $716.00M
Net income $2.83B $478.00M
Free cash flow $3.37B $1.21B
R&D $1.44B –
EPS (diluted) $19.60 $2.01
Cash & equivalents $3.18B $2.45B
Total debt $29.22B $3.87B
Shares (diluted) 138.50M 206.30M
Enterprise value $67.96B $2.15B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMIBWA
P/E 26.3x 26.9x
P/FCF 21.1x 9.2x
P/Operating cash flow 15.3x 6.5x
P/S 2.1x 0.8x
P/B 5.1x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 6.1x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 14.9x –
EV/EBIT 19.2x 17.6x
EV/Revenue 2.2x 0.9x
EV/FCF 22.2x 10.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.1x 7.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 8.19 -1.29

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMIBWA
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.9% 2.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 2.5% 1.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 1.7% 7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.8% 3.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -6.0% 49.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 4.1% -14.3%
Net income growth (1Y) -7.8% 81.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 2.9% -21.1%
EPS growth (1Y) -7.7% 109.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 3.2% -20.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 63.4% 1.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 28.8% 14.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 103.8% 2.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 45.3% 43.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMIBWA
Gross margin 25.3% 19.5%
EBITDA margin 14.4% –
Operating margin 11.2% 5.0%
Pretax margin 11.1% 4.9%
Net margin 7.8% 2.9%
FCF margin 9.7% 8.5%
Operating cash flow margin 13.4% 12.0%
Return on equity 20.7% 8.4%
Return on assets 8.1% 3.5%
Return on invested capital 13.6% 5.0%
Return on capital employed 16.0% 6.8%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 3.6x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMIBWA
Debt / assets 20.6% 27.8%
Debt / equity 0.5x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x –
Debt / FCF 2.2x 3.2x
Liabilities / assets 61.0% 58.4%
Equity / assets 39.0% 41.6%
Interest coverage 12.1x –
Current ratio 1.7x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 4.49 3.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMIBWA
Dividend yield 1.6% 1.2%
Net buyback yield 0.7% 5.8%
Shareholder yield 2.2% 7.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 29.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 11.5%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 45.8%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -4.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMIBWA
Forward P/E 16.5xFY2026 10.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $31.40FY2026 $5.38FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +31.9%FY2026 +9.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +14.7% +2.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $35.36BFY2026 $13.71BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +5.0%FY2026 -4.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +11.2% +0.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMIBWA
Held by institutions 85.4% 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,105 815
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% +3.7%
Institutions buying 1,048 419
Institutions selling 728 295
Buyers to sellers 1.44 1.42

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMIBWA
CMI 1.00 0.47
BWA 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMI and BWA?

Cummins (CMI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cummins (CMI) $71.88B, Borgwarner (BWA) $11.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMI and BWA?

Cummins (CMI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cummins (CMI) 26.5x, Borgwarner (BWA) 27.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Borgwarner (BWA) is cheapest (Cummins (CMI) 16.5x, Borgwarner (BWA) 10.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Cummins (CMI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cummins (CMI) +2.9%, Borgwarner (BWA) +2.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cummins (CMI) has the highest net margin (Cummins (CMI) 7.8%, Borgwarner (BWA) 2.9%). On return on invested capital, Cummins (CMI) leads (Cummins (CMI) 13.6%, Borgwarner (BWA) 5.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Borgwarner (BWA) returned the most: Cummins (CMI) +23.8%, Borgwarner (BWA) +25.7%. Over five years, Cummins (CMI) compounded fastest (Cummins (CMI) +16.5%/yr, Borgwarner (BWA) +4.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cummins (CMI) 0.00%, Borgwarner (BWA) 0.01%. Cummins (CMI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cummins (CMI) has been the steadiest (Cummins (CMI) 37.1%, Borgwarner (BWA) 40.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CMI and BWA move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.47, a moderate positive relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CMI and BWA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cummins (CMI) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.