CMCSA vs ERIC vs LUMN Stock Comparison

Comcast, Ericsson Lm Telephone and Lumen Technologies Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (UNIT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CMCSA Comcast Corp
$21.84 -0.3% 1M -25.8% 1Y
Market cap
$76.97B
P/E
6.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$123.01B
Div. yield
–
Broadband and Cable Communication Services
7 wins
ERIC Ericsson Lm Telephone Co
$11.08 +16.3% 1M +17.5% 1Y
Market cap
$36.65B
P/E
17.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$24.56B
Div. yield
-0.03%
Networking Equipment Technology
4 wins
LUMN Lumen Technologies, Inc.
$4.69 -17.9% 1M -49.9% 1Y
Market cap
$4.65B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$11.83B
Div. yield
–
Broadband and Cable Communication Services

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Comcast leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Comcast 7, Ericsson Lm Telephone 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMCSAERICLUMNLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $76.97B $36.65B $4.65B CMCSA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 6.8x 17.9x -4.5x CMCSA
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.4x 17.0x — CMCSA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -0.2% -38.5% -7.7% CMCSA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.2% 8.3% -8.7% CMCSA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.8% 20.0% 1.2% ERIC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x -0.6x 3.9x ERIC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% -0.03% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -25.8% +17.5% -49.9% ERIC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.9%/yr +0.1%/yr -16.9%/yr ERIC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 34.3% 36.5% 75.0% CMCSA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 66/100 61/100 53/100 CMCSA

Percentile Scorecard

CMCSAERICLUMN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMCSAERICLUMN
Valuation 92 #5 of 49 87 #15 of 112 77 #12 of 49
Growth 23 #35 of 45 47 #58 of 109 68 #15 of 45
Profitability 68 #15 of 45 86 #15 of 104 46 #25 of 45
Financial Health 60 #20 of 49 38 #72 of 116 23 #38 of 49
Shareholder Returns 86 #6 of 37 48 #43 of 81 –
Overall 66 61 53
  • CMCSA ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • ERIC ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • LUMN ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMCSAERICLUMNSPY
1 month -0.3%+16.3%-17.9% -0.2%
3 months -9.7%+11.1%-24.1% +3.9%
6 months -21.0%-1.9%-46.2% +8.2%
Year to date -26.9%+14.8%-39.6% +12.9%
1 year -25.8%+17.5%-49.9% +12.3%
3 years -44.9%+154.1%+252.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year -18.0%+36.5%+52.3% +23.3%
5 years -57.9%+0.4%-60.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year -15.9%+0.1%-16.9% +10.9%
10 years -29.0%+124.3%-84.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year -3.4%+8.4%-17.2% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCMCSAERICLUMNSPY
Volatility, 1Y 34.3%36.5%75.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 40.0%36.7%76.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.021.032.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.750.48-0.67 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.9%-65.8%-93.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -32.8%-19.4%-60.4% -1.2%
52-week high $32.48$13.74$11.83 $779.14
52-week low $20.66$9.15$4.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMCSAERICLUMN
P/E now vs peer median 6.9xmedian 11.8x 18.1xmedian 33.2x -4.6xmedian 11.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 1.1x 1.5xmedian 2.8x 0.4xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 6.8x 9.3xmedian 20.0x 5.6xmedian 6.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 5.9x 9.9xmedian 29.8x 5.8xmedian 5.9x
P/B now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 1.2x 3.4xmedian 3.0x -3.2xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median -1.49median 0.24 0.42median 1.17 -0.08median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMCSAERICLUMN
Revenue $123.01B $24.56B $11.83B
Gross profit – $11.51B $5.66B
Operating income $18.10B $2.90B $198.00M
Net income $11.32B $2.04B -$1.02B
Free cash flow $19.67B $3.76B $837.00M
R&D – $5.22B –
EPS (diluted) $3.18 $0.61 $-1.02
Cash & equivalents $7.60B $5.11B $1.88B
Total debt $87.40B $3.73B $13.21B
Shares (diluted) 3.56B 3.34B 1.00B
Enterprise value $42.77B $14.26B -$2.25B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMCSAERICLUMN
P/E 6.9x 18.1x -4.6x
P/FCF 3.9x 9.9x 5.8x
P/Operating cash flow 2.4x 10.8x 0.9x
P/S 0.6x 1.5x 0.4x
P/B 0.8x 3.4x -3.2x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 3.4x -0.9x
EV/EBITDA 4.7x 9.3x 5.6x
EV/EBIT 8.7x 12.2x 81.6x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 1.4x 1.4x
EV/FCF 8.0x 9.4x 19.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.0x 10.2x 3.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.49 0.42 -0.08

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMCSAERICLUMN
Revenue growth (1Y) -0.2% -38.5% -7.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 0.6% -2.0% -8.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 3.7% -7.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 4.0% -11.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -18.4% -18.4% 191.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -8.1% 55.0% 26.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -49.9% -18.7% 13.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -9.3% 43.4% 54.3%
EPS growth (1Y) -48.2% -17.7% 14.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -4.6% 43.1% 54.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -3.5% 4.3% 22.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.7% 44.0% 29.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -6.2% 6.1% -10.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 7.2% 34.7% 48.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMCSAERICLUMN
Gross margin – 46.8% 47.8%
EBITDA margin 27.3% 15.4% 24.3%
Operating margin 14.7% 11.8% 1.7%
Pretax margin 11.3% 11.2% -11.8%
Net margin 9.2% 8.3% -8.7%
FCF margin 16.0% 15.3% 7.1%
Operating cash flow margin 25.8% 14.0% 45.4%
Return on equity 11.9% 18.7% –
Return on assets 4.2% 6.8% -3.3%
Return on invested capital 7.8% 20.0% 1.2%
Return on capital employed 8.0% 17.8% 0.7%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.8x 1.7x -5.2x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMCSAERICLUMN
Debt / assets 33.9% 12.4% 42.9%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.3x -8.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x -0.6x 3.9x
Debt / FCF 4.4x 1.0x 15.8x
Liabilities / assets 64.1% 63.1% 104.8%
Equity / assets 35.9% 36.9% -4.8%
Interest coverage 4.3x – 0.2x
Current ratio 0.8x 1.2x 1.0x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.8x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 1.30 – -0.42

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMCSAERICLUMN
Dividend yield 6.0% 2.8% –
Net buyback yield 5.2% -2.2% –
Shareholder yield 11.3% 0.6% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 50.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 27.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -13.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -7.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMCSAERICLUMN
Forward P/E 6.4xFY2026 17.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.40FY2026 $0.65FY2026 $-0.87FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -21.1%FY2026 -30.9%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +10.3% -3.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $114.72BFY2026 $24.16BFY2026 $10.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -7.3%FY2026 -8.1%FY2026 -13.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.0% +1.0% -5.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMCSAERICLUMN
Held by institutions 88.7% 9.5% 70.7%
Institutions holding 1,884 388 622
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.7% +0.4% +2.6%
Institutions buying 832 219 289
Institutions selling 858 110 180
Buyers to sellers 0.97 1.99 1.61

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMCSAERICLUMN
CMCSA 1.00 0.14 -0.01
ERIC 0.14 1.00 0.25
LUMN -0.01 0.25 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMCSA, ERIC and LUMN?

Comcast (CMCSA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Comcast (CMCSA) $76.97B, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) $36.65B, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) $4.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMCSA, ERIC and LUMN?

Comcast (CMCSA) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Comcast (CMCSA) 6.8x, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 17.9x, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -4.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Comcast (CMCSA) is cheapest (Comcast (CMCSA) 6.4x, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 17.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Comcast (CMCSA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Comcast (CMCSA) -0.2%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) -38.5%, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -7.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Comcast (CMCSA) has the highest net margin (Comcast (CMCSA) 9.2%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 8.3%, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -8.7%). On return on invested capital, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) leads (Comcast (CMCSA) 7.8%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 20.0%, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) 1.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) returned the most: Comcast (CMCSA) -25.8%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +17.5%, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -49.9%. Over five years, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) compounded fastest (Comcast (CMCSA) -15.9%/yr, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) +0.1%/yr, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) -16.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Comcast (CMCSA) has been the steadiest (Comcast (CMCSA) 34.3%, Ericsson Lm Telephone (ERIC) 36.5%, Lumen Technologies (LUMN) 75.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CMCSA, ERIC and LUMN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Comcast (CMCSA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.