CMBT vs DAC vs ECO Stock Comparison

Cmb.Tech, Danaos and Okeanis Eco Tankers Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CMBT Cmb.Tech Nv
$18.76 -1.0% 1M +99.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.21B
P/E
4.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.89B
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
2 wins
DAC Danaos Corp
$159.19 +2.9% 1M +76.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.90B
P/E
5.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
4 wins
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp.
$101.77 +26.7% 1M +196.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.30B
P/E
8.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$706.47M
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Danaos leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Danaos 4, Okeanis Eco Tankers 4, Cmb.Tech 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMBTDACECOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.21B $2.90B $3.30B CMBT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 4.9x 5.4x 8.2x CMBT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.4x 5.6x 5.8x DAC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +84.9% +2.5% +105.2% ECO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.6% 51.3% 56.9% ECO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.8x 0.0x 1.0x DAC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +99.8% +76.8% +196.8% ECO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +12.2%/yr +16.4%/yr — DAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 40.1% 23.5% 46.4% DAC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 73/100 81/100 ECO

Percentile Scorecard

CMBTDACECO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMBTDACECO
Valuation 56 #60 of 136 87 #19 of 136 39 #83 of 136
Growth 95 #7 of 121 49 #62 of 121 100 #1 of 121
Profitability 75 #29 of 112 83 #20 of 112 99 #2 of 112
Financial Health 17 #117 of 140 90 #15 of 140 71 #42 of 140
Shareholder Returns 65 #29 of 80 54 #37 of 80 96 #4 of 80
Overall 61 73 81
  • CMBT ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • DAC ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • ECO ranked among 150 companies in Transportation

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMBTDACECOSPY
1 month -1.0%+2.9%+26.7% +0.7%
3 months +17.2%+12.1%+70.0% +3.7%
6 months +36.2%+32.2%+84.2% +7.1%
Year to date +94.4%+69.0%+200.7% +12.8%
1 year +99.8%+76.8%+196.8% +11.9%
3 years +5.2%+138.2%+250.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year +1.7%+33.6%+51.9% +22.8%
5 years +77.8%+113.4%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +12.2%+16.4%— +10.9%
10 years +143.6%+349.4%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +9.3%+16.2%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCMBTDACECOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 40.1%23.5%46.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 37.5%20.6%44.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.550.620.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.493.274.24 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -62.7%-51.7%-49.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.3%-6.4%0.0% -1.2%
52-week high $20.92$170.09$101.77 $779.14
52-week low $9.09$89.60$31.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMBTDACECO
P/E now vs peer median 5.0xmedian 16.5x 5.4xmedian 16.5x 8.2xmedian 16.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 0.9x 2.8xmedian 0.9x 5.1xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 10.1xmedian 8.8x 4.2xmedian 8.8x 8.4xmedian 8.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 11.9x 3.6xmedian 11.9x 10.0xmedian 11.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 1.2x 0.7xmedian 1.2x 4.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.43median 0.84 1.01median 0.84 —median 0.84

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMBTDACECO
Revenue $2.89B $1.06B $706.47M
Gross profit $2.22B $847.70M $657.71M
Operating income $1.21B $510.90M $440.43M
Net income $839.57M $540.80M $402.14M
Free cash flow $787.73M $807.90M $360.91M
EPS (diluted) $3.73 $29.26 $12.34
Cash & equivalents $151.57M $1.01B $222.59M
Total debt $5.45B $3.76B $2.67B
Shares (diluted) 229.44M 18.48M 32.58M
Enterprise value $3.62B -$1.23B $2.78B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMBTDACECO
P/E 5.0x 5.4x 8.2x
P/FCF 7.5x 3.6x 10.0x
P/Operating cash flow 7.5x 4.1x 10.0x
P/S 2.1x 2.8x 5.1x
P/B 1.9x 0.7x 4.1x
P/Tangible book 1.9x 0.7x 4.1x
EV/EBITDA 10.1x 4.2x 8.4x
EV/EBIT 9.3x 5.7x 9.3x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 2.7x 5.8x
EV/FCF 14.2x 3.6x 11.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 14.2x 4.0x 11.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.43 1.01 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMBTDACECO
Revenue growth (1Y) 84.9% 2.5% 105.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 31.2% 1.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 80.8% 2.6% 118.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 30.8% 0.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 146.6% 38.7% 288.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 20.4% -5.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 274.8% 17.7% 498.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 12.6% 1.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) -20.7% 23.5% 491.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 11.8% 5.4% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 184.9% 17.2% 316.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 184.9% -22.0% 316.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 4.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMBTDACECO
Gross margin 76.7% 80.3% 93.1%
EBITDA margin 38.5% 65.8% 69.0%
Operating margin 42.0% 48.4% 62.3%
Pretax margin 28.5% 51.3% 67.0%
Net margin 29.6% 51.3% 56.9%
FCF margin 27.3% 76.6% 51.1%
Operating cash flow margin 27.3% 67.8% 51.1%
Return on equity – 13.6% 50.2%
Return on assets – 10.2% 26.0%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – 10.0% 30.3%
Asset turnover – 0.2x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.9x 1.3x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 1.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMBTDACECO
Debt / assets 61.8% 22.2% 43.8%
Debt / equity 1.7x 0.3x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.8x 0.0x 1.0x
Debt / FCF 6.9x 1.5x 2.0x
Liabilities / assets 64.6% 25.5% 46.8%
Equity / assets 35.4% 74.5% 53.2%
Interest coverage 2.3x 40.6x –
Current ratio 1.1x 9.3x 4.4x
Quick ratio 0.7x 8.8x 3.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 8.2x 2.3x
Altman Z-score 1.63 2.94 4.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMBTDACECO
Dividend yield 4.5% 2.9% 9.4%
Net buyback yield – 1.0% –
Shareholder yield 4.5% 3.9% 9.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMBTDACECO
Forward P/E 7.4xFY2026 5.6xFY2026 5.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.54FY2026 $28.38FY2026 $17.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +262.9%FY2026 +8.0%FY2026 +367.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -21.7% -6.3% -49.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.12BFY2026 $1.11BFY2026 $912.99MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +27.8%FY2026 +7.1%FY2026 +244.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +1.9% +7.5% -35.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMBTDACECO
Held by institutions 20.1% 20.8% 29.9%
Institutions holding 170 136 116
Change in shares held, QoQ +8.7% +4.1% +2.4%
Institutions buying 78 72 75
Institutions selling 51 36 29
Buyers to sellers 1.53 2.00 2.59

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMBTDACECO
CMBT 1.00 0.52 0.65
DAC 0.52 1.00 0.51
ECO 0.65 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CMBT, DAC and ECO?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) $4.21B, Danaos (DAC) $2.90B, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) $3.30B.

Which stock is cheaper, CMBT, DAC and ECO?

Cmb.Tech (CMBT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 4.9x, Danaos (DAC) 5.4x, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 8.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Danaos (DAC) is cheapest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 7.4x, Danaos (DAC) 5.6x, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 5.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +84.9%, Danaos (DAC) +2.5%, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) +105.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) has the highest net margin (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 29.6%, Danaos (DAC) 51.3%, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 56.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) returned the most: Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +99.8%, Danaos (DAC) +76.8%, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) +196.8%. Over five years, Danaos (DAC) compounded fastest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) +12.2%/yr, Danaos (DAC) +16.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Danaos (DAC) has been the steadiest (Cmb.Tech (CMBT) 40.1%, Danaos (DAC) 23.5%, Okeanis Eco Tankers (ECO) 46.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CMBT, DAC and ECO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Danaos (DAC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.