CM vs SAN vs GS Stock Comparison

Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce, Banco Santander and Goldman Sachs Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
SAN Banco Santander, S.A.
$12.38 -14.1% 1M +28.0% 1Y
Market cap
$185.46B
P/E
9.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$70.35B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$893.23 -4.5% 1M +13.9% 1Y
Market cap
$273.64B
P/E
12.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Banco Santander leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Banco Santander 4, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce 4, Goldman Sachs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCMSANGSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $108.98B $185.46B $273.64B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.6x 9.8x 12.8x SAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.5x 11.4x 11.9x SAN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +15.7% +7.4% +18.7% GS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.9% 26.9% — CM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 26.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.0x -103.6x — SAN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +40.4% +28.0% +13.9% CM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.8%/yr +26.7%/yr +16.8%/yr SAN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 21.8% 34.3% 31.9% CM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 14/100 48/100 CM

Percentile Scorecard

CMSANGS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCMSANGS
Valuation 26 #267 of 362 8 #335 of 362 20 #290 of 362
Growth 75 #57 of 221 18 #181 of 221 96 #10 of 221
Profitability 89 #22 of 200 12 #176 of 200 –
Financial Health 11 #180 of 203 0 #203 of 203 –
Shareholder Returns 59 #142 of 342 34 #226 of 342 27 #251 of 342
Overall 52 14 48
  • CM ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • SAN ranked among 370 companies in Banking
  • GS ranked among 370 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCMSANGSSPY
1 month +1.7%-14.1%-4.5% -0.8%
3 months -2.3%-11.5%-14.6% +3.5%
6 months +4.7%+3.2%-4.8% +7.0%
Year to date +27.5%+5.5%+1.6% +12.2%
1 year +40.4%+28.0%+13.9% +13.0%
3 years +232.7%+242.9%+208.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +49.3%+50.8%+45.5% +23.1%
5 years +90.4%+226.6%+117.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year +13.8%+26.7%+16.8% +11.0%
10 years +207.1%+169.7%+404.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year +11.9%+10.4%+17.6% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCMSANGSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 21.8%34.3%31.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 23.0%33.9%32.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.831.711.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.860.820.44 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.4%-42.0%-34.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.6%-17.6%-22.5% -1.8%
52-week high $123.74$15.03$1,152.07 $779.14
52-week low $82.39$9.87$773.70 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCMSANGS
P/E now vs peer median 15.5xmedian 12.1x 9.7xmedian 12.1x 12.6xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 3.4x 2.6xmedian 3.4x 3.7xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 5.0x -107.0xmedian 5.0x —median 5.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 10.4xmedian 11.0x -4.2xmedian 11.0x -6.4xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.2x 17.7xmedian 1.2x 2.1xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.59median 1.36 0.36median 1.36 0.26median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCMSANGS
Revenue $23.35B $70.35B $69.70B
Gross profit – -$52.97B –
Operating income – -$95.63B –
Net income $7.33B $20.36B –
Free cash flow $10.29B -$42.89B –
EPS (diluted) $7.41 $1.27 $69.89
Cash & equivalents $10.94B $157.63B $177.00B
Total debt $45.66B $27.02T –
Shares (diluted) 940.68M 14.98B 304.90M
Enterprise value $68.06B -$496.54B $273.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCMSANGS
P/E 15.5x 9.7x 12.6x
P/FCF 10.4x -4.2x -6.4x
P/Operating cash flow 10.4x -4.2x –
P/S 4.6x 2.6x 3.7x
P/B 2.2x 17.7x 2.1x
P/Tangible book 2.3x 47.6x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 4.3x -107.0x –
EV/EBIT 4.5x -99.9x –
EV/Revenue 6.1x 80.5x 3.7x
EV/FCF 13.7x -132.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow 13.7x -132.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.59 0.36 0.26

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCMSANGS
Revenue growth (1Y) 15.7% 7.4% 18.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 11.1% 6.9% 15.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 25.5% 28.1% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 27.5% 20.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 24.8% -83.3% 39.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.4% 26.9% 49.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -16.2% -199.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.7% -96.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -16.2% -199.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.7% -96.9% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCMSANGS
Gross margin – -75.3% –
EBITDA margin 142.0% -75.2% –
Operating margin – -135.9% –
Pretax margin 39.0% 32.4% –
Net margin 29.9% 26.9% –
FCF margin 44.1% -61.0% –
Operating cash flow margin 44.1% -61.0% –
Return on equity 15.3% 246.8% –
Return on assets 0.9% 0.9% –
Return on invested capital 26.3% – –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x -2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCMSANGS
Debt / assets 5.4% 256.5% –
Debt / equity 1.0x 558.7x –
Net debt / EBITDA 1.0x -103.6x –
Debt / FCF 4.4x -133.5x –
Liabilities / assets 94.3% 99.5% 94.3%
Equity / assets 5.7% 0.5% 5.7%
Interest coverage 1.4x -0.8x –
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCMSANGS
Dividend yield 3.7% 2.3% 2.0%
Net buyback yield -0.7% – –
Shareholder yield 3.0% 2.3% 2.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 42.4% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 30.2% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 12.8% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 19.6% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCMSANGS
Forward P/E 16.5xFY2026 11.4xFY2026 11.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $7.02FY2026 $1.09FY2026 $75.07FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.3%FY2026 +2.8%FY2026 +46.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.4% +23.9% -6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $25.13BFY2026 $76.20BFY2026 $68.80BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 +3.5%FY2026 +18.1%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.9% -2.8% +4.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCMSANGS
Held by institutions 45.6% 3.4% 72.1%
Institutions holding 566 659 3,147
Change in shares held, QoQ 0.0% +2.8% +1.1%
Institutions buying 291 402 1,551
Institutions selling 172 149 1,123
Buyers to sellers 1.69 2.70 1.38

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CMSANGS
CM 1.00 0.53 0.48
SAN 0.53 1.00 0.53
GS 0.48 0.53 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CM, SAN and GS?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) $108.98B, Banco Santander (SAN) $185.46B, Goldman Sachs (GS) $273.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, CM, SAN and GS?

Banco Santander (SAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 15.6x, Banco Santander (SAN) 9.8x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Banco Santander (SAN) is cheapest (Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 16.5x, Banco Santander (SAN) 11.4x, Goldman Sachs (GS) 11.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Goldman Sachs (GS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +15.7%, Banco Santander (SAN) +7.4%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) has the highest net margin (Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 29.9%, Banco Santander (SAN) 26.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) returned the most: Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +40.4%, Banco Santander (SAN) +28.0%, Goldman Sachs (GS) +13.9%. Over five years, Banco Santander (SAN) compounded fastest (Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) +13.8%/yr, Banco Santander (SAN) +26.7%/yr, Goldman Sachs (GS) +16.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 0.03%, Banco Santander (SAN) 0.00%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 0.00%. Banco Santander (SAN) and Goldman Sachs (GS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) has been the steadiest (Canadian Imperial Bank Of Commerce (CM) 21.8%, Banco Santander (SAN) 34.3%, Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CM, SAN and GS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Banco Santander (SAN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.