CLW vs RYAM vs SUZ Stock Comparison

Clearwater Paper, Rayonier Advanced Materials and Suzano Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLW Clearwater Paper Corp
$19.32 -9.5% 1M -3.2% 1Y
Market cap
$308.01M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.52B
Div. yield
–
Paper Packaging Basic Materials
2 wins
SUZ Suzano S.A.
$8.64 -6.3% 1M -4.6% 1Y
Market cap
$10.91B
P/E
7.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.04B
Div. yield
–
Pulp and Paper Basic Materials
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Suzano leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Suzano 7, Clearwater Paper 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLWRYAMSUZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $308.01M $437.47M $10.91B SUZ
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -6.2x -3.1x 7.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 6.1x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.9% -3.3% +0.7% SUZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.2% -9.5% 17.2% SUZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -5.7% -4.7% 7.1% SUZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 20.6x 8.4x 3.1x SUZ
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -3.2% -10.1% -4.6% CLW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -14.9%/yr -2.1%/yr -1.5%/yr SUZ
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 52.7% 68.0% 29.8% SUZ
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 57/100 22/100 57/100 CLW

Percentile Scorecard

CLWRYAMSUZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLWRYAMSUZ
Valuation 93 #2 of 16 42 #55 of 94 90 #29 of 287
Growth 47 #9 of 16 9 #84 of 92 17 #222 of 267
Profitability 33 #11 of 16 26 #66 of 89 77 #55 of 240
Financial Health 81 #4 of 17 10 #87 of 97 30 #207 of 295
Shareholder Returns 31 #10 of 14 – 70 #62 of 204
Overall 57 22 57
  • CLW ranked among 17 companies in Packaging
  • RYAM ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • SUZ ranked among 308 companies in Basic Materials

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLWRYAMSUZSPY
1 month -9.5%-26.9%-6.3% -1.0%
3 months +14.8%-20.1%+4.3% +2.9%
6 months +32.1%-30.5%-5.1% +6.4%
Year to date +11.0%+13.6%-7.5% +11.4%
1 year -3.2%-10.1%-4.6% +13.1%
3 years -43.3%+137.2%-17.5% +79.4%
3 years, per year -17.2%+33.4%-6.2% +21.5%
5 years -55.5%-10.0%-7.1% +67.7%
5 years, per year -14.9%-2.1%-1.5% +10.9%
10 years -65.5%-51.4%+159.5% +255.2%
10 years, per year -10.1%-7.0%+10.0% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCLWRYAMSUZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 52.7%68.0%29.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 50.5%56.0%27.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.901.770.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.06-0.15-0.16 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -77.8%-71.6%-41.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -17.1%-43.1%-24.6% -2.5%
52-week high $23.30$11.75$11.46 $779.14
52-week low $12.44$5.52$7.67 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLWRYAMSUZ
P/E now vs peer median -6.3xmedian 18.2x -3.2xmedian 21.5x 6.9xmedian 17.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 0.7x 0.3xmedian 1.4x 1.2xmedian 1.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 44.8xmedian 9.5x 13.6xmedian 12.4x 5.7xmedian 9.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 15.7x -12.4xmedian 15.5x 12.3xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.4x 2.3xmedian 1.6x 1.1xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.16median 0.83 0.03median 1.70 -0.19median 0.73

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLWRYAMSUZ
Revenue $1.52B $1.47B $9.04B
Gross profit $24.60M $86.44M $2.58B
Operating income -$82.20M -$51.13M $1.91B
Net income -$49.30M -$139.93M $1.56B
Free cash flow $56.60M -$36.56M $888.28M
EPS (diluted) $-3.06 $-2.07 $1.25
Cash & equivalents $95.40M $57.01M $3.21B
Total debt $361.10M $774.77M $17.89B
Shares (diluted) 16.13M 67.51M 1.24B
Enterprise value $111.01M $160.09M -$7.42B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLWRYAMSUZ
P/E -6.3x -3.2x 6.9x
P/FCF 5.5x -12.4x 12.3x
P/Operating cash flow 2.9x 8.8x 3.5x
P/S 0.2x 0.3x 1.2x
P/B 0.4x 2.3x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 2.4x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA 44.8x 13.6x 5.7x
EV/EBIT -7.0x -22.9x 12.4x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 0.8x 2.6x
EV/FCF 10.2x -32.0x 26.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 5.3x 22.8x 7.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.16 0.03 -0.19

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLWRYAMSUZ
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.9% -3.3% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 25.5% -6.9% -1.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -80.2% -32.6% -23.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 28.3% -15.4% -17.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) -647.3% -130.1% -20.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -38.8% -43.1% -30.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -124.5% 68.5% 11.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -39.6% -113.6% -29.7%
EPS growth (1Y) -124.7% 68.8% 14.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -40.3% -111.7% -36.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 337.9% -55.0% -11.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.1% -35.2% -13.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 131.2% -241.2% -70.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 63.3% -34.6% -47.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLWRYAMSUZ
Gross margin 1.6% 5.9% 28.6%
EBITDA margin 0.8% 5.9% 46.0%
Operating margin -5.4% -3.5% 21.1%
Pretax margin -6.9% -10.2% 25.9%
Net margin -3.2% -9.5% 17.2%
FCF margin 3.7% -2.5% 9.8%
Operating cash flow margin 7.1% 3.5% 34.8%
Return on equity -6.1% -65.8% 16.6%
Return on assets -3.1% -8.5% 4.8%
Return on invested capital -5.7% -4.7% 7.1%
Return on capital employed -6.1% -4.0% 6.4%
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.9x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -2.2x -0.4x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLWRYAMSUZ
Debt / assets 23.0% 47.8% 54.2%
Debt / equity 0.5x 4.0x 1.9x
Net debt / EBITDA 20.6x 8.4x 3.1x
Debt / FCF 6.4x -21.2x 20.1x
Liabilities / assets 49.5% 88.0% 70.9%
Equity / assets 50.5% 12.0% 29.1%
Interest coverage – -0.5x 1.4x
Current ratio 2.3x 1.4x 3.4x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.6x 2.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.2x 1.9x
Altman Z-score 2.00 0.92 1.03

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLWRYAMSUZ
Dividend yield – – 2.4%
Net buyback yield 0.7% – –
Shareholder yield 0.7% 0.0% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLWRYAMSUZ
Forward P/E – – 6.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-3.47FY2026 $-1.18FY2026 $1.41FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – – -32.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – – -28.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.56BFY2026 $1.40BFY2026 $10.38BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +0.2%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.0% +1.5% +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLWRYAMSUZ
Held by institutions 88.7% 77.1% 5.9%
Institutions holding 134 188 136
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.9% -2.3% +0.6%
Institutions buying 85 98 77
Institutions selling 33 48 46
Buyers to sellers 2.58 2.04 1.67

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLWRYAMSUZ
CLW 1.00 0.21 0.15
RYAM 0.21 1.00 0.24
SUZ 0.15 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLW, RYAM and SUZ?

Suzano (SUZ) is the largest by market capitalisation: Clearwater Paper (CLW) $308.01M, Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) $437.47M, Suzano (SUZ) $10.91B.

Which company is growing faster?

Suzano (SUZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Clearwater Paper (CLW) -1.9%, Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) -3.3%, Suzano (SUZ) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Suzano (SUZ) has the highest net margin (Clearwater Paper (CLW) -3.2%, Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) -9.5%, Suzano (SUZ) 17.2%). On return on invested capital, Suzano (SUZ) leads (Clearwater Paper (CLW) -5.7%, Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) -4.7%, Suzano (SUZ) 7.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clearwater Paper (CLW) returned the most: Clearwater Paper (CLW) -3.2%, Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) -10.1%, Suzano (SUZ) -4.6%. Over five years, Suzano (SUZ) compounded fastest (Clearwater Paper (CLW) -14.9%/yr, Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) -2.1%/yr, Suzano (SUZ) -1.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Suzano (SUZ) has been the steadiest (Clearwater Paper (CLW) 52.7%, Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM) 68.0%, Suzano (SUZ) 29.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLW, RYAM and SUZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Suzano (SUZ) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.