CLUS vs EVR vs GSRF Stock Comparison

Cluster Group Holdings, Evercore and GSR IV Acquisition Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
EVR Evercore Inc.
$257.56 -2.0% 1M -20.6% 1Y
Market cap
$10.01B
P/E
13.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.74B
Div. yield
0.01%
Investment Banking Financial Services
3 wins
GSRF GSR IV Acquisition Corp.
$10.27 +0.4% 1M +2.3% 1Y
Market cap
$604.58M
P/E
103.2x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Investment Banking Financial Services
1 win

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Evercore leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Evercore 3, GSR IV Acquisition 1, Cluster Group Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLUSEVRGSRFLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $8.00B $10.01B $604.58M EVR
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1,146,093x 13.4x 103.2x EVR
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.9x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +45.7% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 15.7% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 31.3% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.7x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months 0.0% -20.6% +2.3% GSRF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -39.1%/yr +11.4%/yr — EVR
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 0.0% 38.1% 1.4% CLUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 86/100 — –

Percentile Scorecard

CLUSEVRGSRF

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLUSEVRGSRF
Valuation – 92 #9 of 97 54 #45 of 97
Growth 78 #16 of 68 84 #12 of 68 –
Profitability – 89 #8 of 67 –
Financial Health – 87 #14 of 97 81 #19 of 97
Shareholder Returns – 77 #10 of 40 –
Overall – 86 –
  • CLUS ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • EVR ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets
  • GSRF ranked among 112 companies in Capital Markets

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLUSEVRGSRFSPY
1 month 0.0%-2.0%+0.4% -0.8%
3 months 0.0%-24.3%+1.1% +3.5%
6 months 0.0%-25.9%+1.9% +7.0%
Year to date 0.0%-24.3%+2.8% +12.2%
1 year 0.0%-20.6%+2.3% +13.0%
3 years -31.5%+103.3%— +86.3%
3 years, per year -11.9%+26.7%— +23.1%
5 years -91.6%+71.2%— +68.6%
5 years, per year -39.1%+11.4%— +11.0%
10 years +33.3%+371.7%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +2.9%+16.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCLUSEVRGSRFSPY
Volatility, 1Y 0.0%38.1%1.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y —42.2%2.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.001.720.00 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —-0.541.59 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.5%-48.4%-1.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-32.8%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $200.00$383.12$10.27 $779.14
52-week low $200.00$247.98$9.96 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLUSEVRGSRF
P/E now vs peer median -1,146,093xmedian 29.4x 13.4xmedian 29.4x 103.1xmedian 29.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 2.9x 2.1xmedian 2.9x —median 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.7x 7.6xmedian 13.7x —median 13.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 16.0x 6.1xmedian 16.0x -2,067xmedian 16.0x
P/B now vs peer median -105,257xmedian 2.3x 4.6xmedian 2.3x -76.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.52 0.49median 0.52 —median 0.52

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLUSEVRGSRF
Revenue – $4.74B –
Operating income -$50.23K – -$1.17M
Net income -$6.98K $809.20M $5.86M
Free cash flow – $1.63B –
EPS (diluted) $0.00 $18.11 $0.20
Cash & equivalents – $1.26B $643.33K
Total debt – $2.26B –
Shares (diluted) 40.00M 41.13M 29.41M
Enterprise value $8.00B $160.80M $598.73M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLUSEVRGSRF
P/E -1,146,093x 13.4x 103.1x
P/FCF – 6.1x -2,067x
P/Operating cash flow – 6.0x –
P/S – 2.1x –
P/B -105,257x 4.6x -76.0x
P/Tangible book -105,257x 4.6x -76.0x
EV/EBITDA – 7.6x –
EV/EBIT -159,282x 7.8x -517.2x
EV/Revenue – 1.7x –
EV/FCF – 5.0x –
EV/Operating cash flow – 4.8x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.49 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLUSEVRGSRF
Revenue growth (1Y) – 45.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 23.8% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) -16.4% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 83.8% 60.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 28.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 98.0% 61.5% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 27.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 106.2% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 50.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 119.1% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 51.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLUSEVRGSRF
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 22.6% –
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin – 21.3% –
Net margin – 15.7% –
FCF margin – 34.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 35.2% –
Return on equity – 37.9% –
Return on assets – 18.0% 2.5%
Return on invested capital – 31.3% –
Return on capital employed – 32.5% -0.5%
Asset turnover – 1.1x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.1x –
Stock comp / revenue – 16.1% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLUSEVRGSRF
Debt / assets – 11.5% –
Debt / equity – 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.7x –
Debt / FCF – 0.3x –
Liabilities / assets – 53.7% 103.3%
Equity / assets – 46.3% -3.3%
Interest coverage – 31.6x –
Current ratio – 2.5x 34.7x
Quick ratio – 2.3x 30.8x
Cash ratio – 1.9x 30.8x
Altman Z-score – 5.46 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLUSEVRGSRF
Dividend yield – 1.3% –
Net buyback yield – 9.5% –
Shareholder yield – 10.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 18.5% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 9.2% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.6% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 5.8% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLUSEVRGSRF
Forward P/E – 13.9xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $18.57FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY – +27.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +7.6% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.39BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY – +13.2%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLUSEVRGSRF
Held by institutions – 92.0% 35.7%
Institutions holding – 703 44
Change in shares held, QoQ – +1.8% -0.9%
Institutions buying – 362 9
Institutions selling – 237 9
Buyers to sellers – 1.53 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLUSEVRGSRF
CLUS – – –
EVR – 1.00 0.12
GSRF – 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLUS, EVR and GSRF?

Evercore (EVR) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) $8.00B, Evercore (EVR) $10.01B, GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) $604.58M.

Which stock is cheaper, CLUS, EVR and GSRF?

Evercore (EVR) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) -1,146,093x, Evercore (EVR) 13.4x, GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) 103.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) returned the most: Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) 0.0%, Evercore (EVR) -20.6%, GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) +2.3%. Over five years, Evercore (EVR) compounded fastest (Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) -39.1%/yr, Evercore (EVR) +11.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Evercore (EVR) 0.01%, GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) 0.00%. Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) and GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) has been the steadiest (Cluster Group Holdings (CLUS) 0.0%, Evercore (EVR) 38.1%, GSR IV Acquisition (GSRF) 1.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLUS, EVR and GSRF?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Evercore (EVR) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.