CLS vs TTMI vs SANM Stock Comparison

Celestica, Ttm Technologies and Sanmina Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLS Celestica Inc
$259.98 -28.4% 1M -8.0% 1Y
Market cap
$28.45B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.59B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
7 wins
TTMI Ttm Technologies Inc
$80.11 -36.3% 1M +37.2% 1Y
Market cap
$8.93B
P/E
37.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.38B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
1 win
SANM Sanmina Corp
$155.71 -29.8% 1M +17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$8.67B
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.76B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Celestica leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Celestica 7, Sanmina 3, Ttm Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLSTTMISANMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $28.45B $8.93B $8.67B CLS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 25.5x 37.7x 28.1x CLS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 22.8x 15.6x 13.8x SANM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +47.3% +27.6% +58.6% SANM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 7.2% 7.0% 2.4% CLS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 37.9% 10.6% 7.8% CLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 1.0x 0.5x CLS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.0% +37.2% +17.3% TTMI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +94.6%/yr +42.9%/yr +32.7%/yr CLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.0% 90.1% 70.8% SANM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 64/100 60/100 63/100 CLS

Percentile Scorecard

CLSTTMISANM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLSTTMISANM
Valuation 55 #51 of 112 52 #54 of 112 82 #21 of 112
Growth 94 #8 of 109 88 #14 of 109 84 #18 of 109
Profitability 80 #22 of 105 62 #41 of 105 60 #43 of 105
Financial Health 35 #76 of 117 37 #74 of 117 27 #86 of 117
Shareholder Returns 54 #38 of 82 – –
Overall 64 60 63
  • CLS ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • TTMI ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware
  • SANM ranked among 122 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLSTTMISANMSPY
1 month -28.4%-36.3%-29.8% -1.0%
3 months -14.8%-39.0%-25.3% +2.9%
6 months -36.6%-46.2%-19.0% +6.4%
Year to date -12.1%+16.1%+3.8% +11.4%
1 year -8.0%+37.2%+17.3% +13.1%
3 years +899.5%+573.2%+204.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year +115.5%+88.9%+44.9% +21.5%
5 years +2,683.5%+496.1%+310.4% +67.7%
5 years, per year +94.6%+42.9%+32.7% +10.9%
10 years +2,162.7%+587.6%+446.4% +255.2%
10 years, per year +36.6%+21.3%+18.5% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCLSTTMISANMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.0%90.1%70.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 86.3%97.7%81.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.373.762.59 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.100.410.24 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.0%-66.6%-45.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.0%-63.8%-44.9% -2.5%
52-week high $472.40$221.47$282.72 $779.14
52-week low $249.52$58.40$122.86 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLSTTMISANM
P/E now vs peer median 26.8xmedian 31.3x 35.3xmedian 31.3x 27.2xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 1.9xmedian 2.6x 2.5xmedian 2.6x 0.7xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.5xmedian 19.6x 18.2xmedian 19.6x 12.5xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 57.6xmedian 28.3x -557.4xmedian 28.3x 14.0xmedian 28.3x
P/B now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 2.9x 4.4xmedian 2.9x 3.0xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.15 0.75median 1.15 9.69median 1.15

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLSTTMISANM
Revenue $15.59B $3.38B $12.76B
Gross profit $1.86B $715.64M $1.15B
Operating income $1.37B $334.16M $530.30M
Net income $1.12B $236.78M $326.85M
Free cash flow $518.70M -$15.14M $594.15M
R&D $154.10M $29.71M $33.59M
EPS (diluted) $9.61 $2.20 $5.59
Cash & equivalents $535.70M $507.91M $1.84B
Total debt $810.40M $3.72B $2.17B
Shares (diluted) 116.20M 107.58M 55.13M
Enterprise value $26.64B $7.02B $2.91B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLSTTMISANM
P/E 26.8x 35.3x 27.2x
P/FCF 57.6x -557.4x 14.0x
P/Operating cash flow 26.1x 26.1x 9.3x
P/S 1.9x 2.5x 0.7x
P/B 12.1x 4.4x 3.0x
P/Tangible book 13.4x 4.7x 3.0x
EV/EBITDA 19.5x 18.2x 12.5x
EV/EBIT 22.0x 26.6x 16.4x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 2.6x 0.7x
EV/FCF 58.2x -588.2x 14.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.4x 27.6x 9.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.75 9.69

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLSTTMISANM
Revenue growth (1Y) 47.3% 27.6% 58.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 12.3% 11.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 55.0% 33.6% 65.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 18.5% 15.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 84.6% 94.3% 45.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 47.1% 4.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 107.4% 154.1% 16.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 48.5% 0.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 106.8% 147.7% 17.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 47.2% 2.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 108.4% 35.5% 90.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 55.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 34.3% -185.8% 62.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 146.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLSTTMISANM
Gross margin 12.0% 21.2% 9.0%
EBITDA margin 9.9% 14.5% 5.4%
Operating margin 8.8% 9.9% 4.2%
Pretax margin 8.4% 7.8% 3.6%
Net margin 7.2% 7.0% 2.4%
FCF margin 3.3% -0.4% 4.7%
Operating cash flow margin 7.3% 9.6% 7.1%
Return on equity 48.8% 12.6% 12.2%
Return on assets 12.4% 5.6% 3.4%
Return on invested capital 37.9% 10.6% 7.8%
Return on capital employed 48.2% 11.4% 10.0%
Asset turnover 1.7x 0.8x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.4x 2.8x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 1.8% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLSTTMISANM
Debt / assets 8.3% 22.0% 22.3%
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.5x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.2x 1.0x 0.5x
Debt / FCF 1.6x -64.3x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 74.7% 56.2% 71.7%
Equity / assets 25.3% 43.8% 28.3%
Interest coverage 21.9x 7.6x 5.6x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.8x 1.8x
Quick ratio 0.7x 1.4x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.4x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 3.69 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLSTTMISANM
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.2% – –
Shareholder yield 0.2% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLSTTMISANM
Forward P/E 22.8xFY2026 15.6xFY2026 13.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $11.40FY2026 $5.13FY2026 $11.31FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +91.0%FY2026 +108.5%FY2026 +87.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +77.5% +36.8% +19.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $19.74BFY2026 $4.19BFY2026 $13.27BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +61.4%FY2026 +44.1%FY2026 +63.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +69.4% +44.9% +33.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLSTTMISANM
Held by institutions 69.0% 92.4% 93.3%
Institutions holding 873 638 569
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% +0.6% -5.4%
Institutions buying 518 396 317
Institutions selling 272 202 207
Buyers to sellers 1.90 1.96 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLSTTMISANM
CLS 1.00 0.61 0.45
TTMI 0.61 1.00 0.64
SANM 0.45 0.64 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLS, TTMI and SANM?

Celestica (CLS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Celestica (CLS) $28.45B, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) $8.93B, Sanmina (SANM) $8.67B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLS, TTMI and SANM?

Celestica (CLS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Celestica (CLS) 25.5x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 37.7x, Sanmina (SANM) 28.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Sanmina (SANM) is cheapest (Celestica (CLS) 22.8x, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 15.6x, Sanmina (SANM) 13.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sanmina (SANM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Celestica (CLS) +47.3%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +27.6%, Sanmina (SANM) +58.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Celestica (CLS) has the highest net margin (Celestica (CLS) 7.2%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 7.0%, Sanmina (SANM) 2.4%). On return on invested capital, Celestica (CLS) leads (Celestica (CLS) 37.9%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 10.6%, Sanmina (SANM) 7.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ttm Technologies (TTMI) returned the most: Celestica (CLS) -8.0%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +37.2%, Sanmina (SANM) +17.3%. Over five years, Celestica (CLS) compounded fastest (Celestica (CLS) +94.6%/yr, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) +42.9%/yr, Sanmina (SANM) +32.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sanmina (SANM) has been the steadiest (Celestica (CLS) 79.0%, Ttm Technologies (TTMI) 90.1%, Sanmina (SANM) 70.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLS, TTMI and SANM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Celestica (CLS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.