CLS vs KTCC Stock Comparison

Celestica and Key Tronic Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLS Celestica Inc
$300.08 -15.9% 1M -8.1% 1Y
Market cap
$34.61B
P/E
27.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$18.23B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
7 wins
KTCC Key Tronic Corp
$2.14 +1.9% 1M -38.2% 1Y
Market cap
$23.84M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$386.67M
Div. yield
–
Electronic Manufacturing Services Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Celestica leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Celestica 7, Key Tronic 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLSKTCCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $34.61B $23.84M CLS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 27.8x -0.5x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +61.6% -17.4% CLS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.8% -12.4% CLS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 25.0% -6.5% CLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.9x -46.7x KTCC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -8.1% -38.2% CLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +98.3%/yr -19.8%/yr CLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.9% 60.1% KTCC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 27/100 CLS

Percentile Scorecard

CLSKTCC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLSKTCC
Valuation 60 #45 of 111 64 #41 of 111
Growth 89 #13 of 108 2 #106 of 108
Profitability 78 #24 of 104 25 #78 of 104
Financial Health 56 #51 of 115 16 #97 of 115
Shareholder Returns 20 #63 of 78 –
Overall 60 27
  • CLS ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • KTCC ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLSKTCCSPY
1 month -15.9%+1.9% +0.9%
3 months -8.8%-45.5% +5.9%
6 months -20.3%-27.5% +8.5%
Year to date +1.5%-23.3% +13.3%
1 year -8.1%-38.2% +12.4%
3 years +1,240.8%-45.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year +137.7%-18.1% +23.5%
5 years +2,955.8%-66.8% +68.2%
5 years, per year +98.3%-19.8% +11.0%
10 years +2,419.6%-73.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year +38.1%-12.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCLSKTCCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.9%60.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 86.3%70.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.380.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.10-0.63 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.0%-71.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -36.5%-49.8% -0.9%
52-week high $472.40$4.26 $779.14
52-week low $246.25$2.06 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLSKTCC
P/E now vs peer median 29.0xmedian 33.5x -0.5xmedian 33.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.8x 0.1xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.5xmedian 19.6x -52.7xmedian 19.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 69.4xmedian 29.8x -12.1xmedian 29.8x
P/B now vs peer median 6.1xmedian 2.9x 0.3xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.10 0.00median 1.10

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLSKTCC
Revenue $18.23B $386.67M
Gross profit $2.09B $23.94M
Operating income $1.50B -$14.72M
Net income $1.25B -$47.80M
Free cash flow $545.40M -$1.93M
R&D $168.90M $8.01M
EPS (diluted) $10.23 $-4.41
Cash & equivalents $3.96B $584.00K
Total debt $818.80M $182.02M
Shares (diluted) 121.80M 10.84M
Enterprise value $29.14B $20.92M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLSKTCC
P/E 29.0x -0.5x
P/FCF 69.4x -12.1x
P/Operating cash flow 26.9x 5.3x
P/S 2.1x 0.1x
P/B 6.1x 0.3x
P/Tangible book 6.3x 0.3x
EV/EBITDA 20.5x -52.7x
EV/EBIT 23.1x -13.9x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 0.5x
EV/FCF 63.6x -106.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.7x 46.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLSKTCC
Revenue growth (1Y) 61.6% -17.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -13.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 53.8% -34.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -20.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 62.0% -2,719%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -42.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 73.8% -474.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -124.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 65.4% -470.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -124.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 154.8% -76.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 33.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 37.0% -113.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 55.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLSKTCC
Gross margin 11.5% 6.2%
EBITDA margin 9.3% -1.0%
Operating margin 8.3% -3.8%
Pretax margin 8.0% -6.4%
Net margin 6.8% -12.4%
FCF margin 3.0% -0.5%
Operating cash flow margin 7.7% 1.1%
Return on equity 28.7% -55.5%
Return on assets 10.0% -15.4%
Return on invested capital 25.0% -6.5%
Return on capital employed 32.1% -7.2%
Asset turnover 1.5x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.1x -0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLSKTCC
Debt / assets 5.4% 60.7%
Debt / equity 0.1x 2.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.9x -46.7x
Debt / FCF 1.5x -94.5x
Liabilities / assets 59.0% 76.9%
Equity / assets 41.0% 23.1%
Interest coverage 21.3x -1.5x
Current ratio 1.6x 2.1x
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.0x
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.0x
Altman Z-score – 1.75

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLSKTCC
Dividend yield – –
Net buyback yield -8.8% –
Shareholder yield -8.8% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLSKTCC
Forward P/E 26.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $11.54FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +93.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +77.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $20.07BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +64.1%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +70.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLSKTCC
Held by institutions 69.0% 41.0%
Institutions holding 874 26
Change in shares held, QoQ +5.0% -4.2%
Institutions buying 519 10
Institutions selling 272 8
Buyers to sellers 1.91 1.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLSKTCC
CLS 1.00 0.13
KTCC 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLS and KTCC?

Celestica (CLS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Celestica (CLS) $34.61B, Key Tronic (KTCC) $23.84M.

Which company is growing faster?

Celestica (CLS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Celestica (CLS) +61.6%, Key Tronic (KTCC) -17.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Celestica (CLS) has the highest net margin (Celestica (CLS) 6.8%, Key Tronic (KTCC) -12.4%). On return on invested capital, Celestica (CLS) leads (Celestica (CLS) 25.0%, Key Tronic (KTCC) -6.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Celestica (CLS) returned the most: Celestica (CLS) -8.1%, Key Tronic (KTCC) -38.2%. Over five years, Celestica (CLS) compounded fastest (Celestica (CLS) +98.3%/yr, Key Tronic (KTCC) -19.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Key Tronic (KTCC) has been the steadiest (Celestica (CLS) 79.9%, Key Tronic (KTCC) 60.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Do CLS and KTCC move together?

Their daily returns over the past year have a correlation of 0.13, a weak relationship. Holding both diversifies more than two closely linked stocks would.

Which is the better stock, CLS and KTCC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Celestica (CLS) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.