CLMT vs IFF vs GLW Stock Comparison

Calumet, International Flavors & Fragrances and Corning Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLMT Calumet, Inc. /DE
$49.89 -7.0% 1M +148.1% 1Y
Market cap
$4.38B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.59B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
4 wins
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$126.36 -19.4% 1M +41.4% 1Y
Market cap
$108.85B
P/E
72.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
0.89%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

International Flavors & Fragrances leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (International Flavors & Fragrances 7, Calumet 4, Corning 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLMTIFFGLWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.38B $23.80B $108.85B GLW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -31.9x 34.2x 72.0x IFF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 28.4x 36.6x IFF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +12.8% -4.6% — CLMT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.0% 7.0% — IFF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.0% 3.0% — IFF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -12.3x 3.0x — CLMT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 1.72% 0.89% IFF
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +148.1% +42.8% +41.4% CLMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +35.8%/yr -8.9%/yr +28.8%/yr CLMT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 43.9% 35.0% 74.6% IFF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 44/100 51/100 22/100 IFF

Percentile Scorecard

CLMTIFFGLW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLMTIFFGLW
Valuation 33 #63 of 94 43 #54 of 94 11 #84 of 94
Growth 98 #3 of 91 82 #17 of 91 –
Profitability 38 #54 of 86 59 #36 of 86 –
Financial Health 7 #88 of 95 46 #52 of 95 37 #60 of 95
Shareholder Returns – 28 #51 of 70 19 #57 of 70
Overall 44 51 22
  • CLMT ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • IFF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLMTIFFGLWSPY
1 month -7.0%+8.8%-19.4% -0.2%
3 months +20.3%+17.7%+0.3% +3.9%
6 months +63.5%+31.8%-17.4% +8.2%
Year to date +151.1%+38.4%+44.3% +12.9%
1 year +148.1%+42.8%+41.4% +12.3%
3 years +283.5%+37.4%+375.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year +56.6%+11.2%+68.2% +23.3%
5 years +361.5%-37.2%+254.5% +67.9%
5 years, per year +35.8%-8.9%+28.8% +10.9%
10 years +1,266.8%-30.1%+451.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year +29.9%-3.5%+18.6% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLMTIFFGLWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 43.9%35.0%74.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 44.2%28.6%75.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.080.683.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 3.371.220.56 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -61.9%-61.1%-51.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.5%-0.9%-50.6% -1.2%
52-week high $59.05$94.13$255.69 $779.14
52-week low $18.22$61.49$78.03 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLMTIFFGLW
P/E now vs peer median -31.9xmedian 22.0x 34.2xmedian 22.0x 72.0xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.4x 2.4xmedian 1.4x 8.1xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -37.3xmedian 12.4x 17.0xmedian 12.4x —median 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.6xmedian 15.1x 44.1xmedian 15.1x 57.1xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median -3.9xmedian 1.6x 1.7xmedian 1.6x 7.6xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.66 1.06median 1.66 —median 1.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLMTIFFGLW
Revenue $4.59B $9.98B –
Gross profit $301.50M $3.74B –
Operating income $47.10M $754.00M –
Net income -$136.80M $295.00M –
Free cash flow $73.50M $540.00M –
R&D – $684.00M –
EPS (diluted) $-1.56 $2.71 –
Cash & equivalents $109.80M $569.00M $2.54B
Total debt $2.26B $5.70B –
Shares (diluted) 87.59M 257.00M 875.00M
Enterprise value $4.16B $21.50B $109.46B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLMTIFFGLW
P/E -31.9x 34.2x 72.0x
P/FCF 59.6x 44.1x 57.1x
P/Operating cash flow 30.0x 20.5x –
P/S 1.0x 2.4x 8.1x
P/B -3.9x 1.7x 7.6x
P/Tangible book -3.9x 2.3x 7.9x
EV/EBITDA -37.3x 17.0x –
EV/EBIT 138.7x 38.4x –
EV/Revenue 1.4x 2.9x –
EV/FCF 88.9x 53.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 44.7x 24.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 1.06 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLMTIFFGLW
Revenue growth (1Y) 12.8% -4.6% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -5.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 926.0% -3.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -0.2% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 125.6% 295.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 35.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 69.7% 170.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 28.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 70.0% 900.0% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 32.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 392.2% 5.4% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 12.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 159.8% -4.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 26.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLMTIFFGLW
Gross margin 6.6% 37.5% –
EBITDA margin -3.8% 17.1% –
Operating margin 1.0% 7.6% –
Pretax margin -5.9% 3.5% –
Net margin -3.0% 7.0% –
FCF margin 1.6% 5.4% –
Operating cash flow margin 3.2% 11.6% –
Return on equity – 2.1% –
Return on assets -4.9% 1.2% –
Return on invested capital 2.0% 3.0% –
Return on capital employed 3.0% 3.6% –
Asset turnover 1.7x 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.1x 3.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% 0.9% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLMTIFFGLW
Debt / assets 80.6% 22.7% –
Debt / equity -2.0x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA -12.3x 3.0x –
Debt / FCF 30.7x 10.6x –
Liabilities / assets 140.6% 44.3% 58.1%
Equity / assets -40.6% 55.7% 41.9%
Interest coverage 0.2x 4.0x –
Current ratio 0.8x 2.1x 1.7x
Quick ratio 0.4x 0.5x –
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score 1.29 1.81 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLMTIFFGLW
Dividend yield – 1.7% 0.9%
Net buyback yield – 0.3% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.0% 0.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 138.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 75.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 0.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -20.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLMTIFFGLW
Forward P/E – 28.4xFY2026 36.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-1.93FY2026 $3.28FY2026 $3.45FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -21.9%FY2026 +36.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +23.5% +24.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.81BFY2026 $8.10BFY2026 $18.34BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +16.1%FY2026 -25.7%FY2026 +11.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.3% -8.1% +31.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLMTIFFGLW
Held by institutions 52.3% 100.0% 73.0%
Institutions holding 188 753 2,682
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.2% +6.0% +3.5%
Institutions buying 110 410 1,476
Institutions selling 54 226 949
Buyers to sellers 2.04 1.81 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLMTIFFGLW
CLMT 1.00 -0.17 0.00
IFF -0.17 1.00 0.03
GLW 0.00 0.03 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLMT, IFF and GLW?

Corning (GLW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Calumet (CLMT) $4.38B, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) $23.80B, Corning (GLW) $108.85B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLMT, IFF and GLW?

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Calumet (CLMT) -31.9x, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 34.2x, Corning (GLW) 72.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) is cheapest (International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 28.4x, Corning (GLW) 36.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Calumet (CLMT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Calumet (CLMT) +12.8%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) -4.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) has the highest net margin (Calumet (CLMT) -3.0%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) leads (Calumet (CLMT) 2.0%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 3.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Calumet (CLMT) returned the most: Calumet (CLMT) +148.1%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) +42.8%, Corning (GLW) +41.4%. Over five years, Calumet (CLMT) compounded fastest (Calumet (CLMT) +35.8%/yr, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) -8.9%/yr, Corning (GLW) +28.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) has the highest dividend yield: Calumet (CLMT) 0.00%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 1.72%, Corning (GLW) 0.89%. Calumet (CLMT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) has been the steadiest (Calumet (CLMT) 43.9%, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) 35.0%, Corning (GLW) 74.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLMT, IFF and GLW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.