CLMB vs INGM vs NSIT Stock Comparison

Climb Global Solutions, Ingram Micro Holding and Insight Enterprises Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PLUS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corp
$28.27 +4.7% 1M +27.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.65B
P/E
15.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.98B
Div. yield
1.17%
Technology Distribution Technology
6 wins
NSIT Insight Enterprises Inc
$178.35 +12.1% 1M +66.8% 1Y
Market cap
$5.26B
P/E
25.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.58B
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ingram Micro Holding leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Ingram Micro Holding 6, Climb Global Solutions 4, Insight Enterprises 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLMBINGMNSITLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $600.13M $6.65B $5.26B INGM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.7x 15.2x 25.4x INGM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 24.0x 8.7x 13.5x INGM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +23.1% +11.5% +2.7% CLMB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.9% 0.8% 2.5% CLMB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.9% 8.2% 9.0% CLMB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.5x 2.2x NSIT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.13% 1.17% — INGM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -1.5% +27.9% +66.8% NSIT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +37.1%/yr — +13.8%/yr CLMB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 51.1% 44.0% 45.6% INGM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 50/100 49/100 INGM

Percentile Scorecard

CLMBINGMNSIT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLMBINGMNSIT
Valuation 41 #30 of 50 65 #18 of 50 47 #27 of 50
Growth 80 #10 of 45 86 #7 of 45 55 #21 of 45
Profitability 68 #14 of 41 30 #29 of 41 58 #18 of 41
Financial Health 36 #40 of 62 28 #45 of 62 26 #46 of 62
Shareholder Returns 10 #27 of 30 38 #19 of 30 59 #13 of 30
Overall 47 50 49
  • CLMB ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • INGM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • NSIT ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLMBINGMNSITSPY
1 month +1.6%+4.7%+12.1% -0.2%
3 months +14.1%-6.0%+42.9% +3.9%
6 months +51.8%-4.8%+141.1% +8.2%
Year to date +25.1%+32.5%+118.9% +12.9%
1 year -1.5%+27.9%+66.8% +12.3%
3 years +195.3%—+25.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year +43.5%—+7.9% +23.3%
5 years +384.3%—+90.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year +37.1%—+13.8% +10.9%
10 years +644.4%—+435.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year +22.2%—+18.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLMBINGMNSITSPY
Volatility, 1Y 51.1%44.0%45.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 57.4%46.7%43.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.571.251.33 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.030.631.46 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -53.5%-40.8%-71.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.7%-10.7%-0.2% -1.2%
52-week high $33.75$31.64$178.72 $779.14
52-week low $16.68$19.51$64.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLMBINGMNSIT
P/E now vs peer median 28.7xmedian 17.4x 15.2xmedian 17.4x 25.4xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.8xmedian 0.7x 0.1xmedian 0.7x 0.6xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 10.7x 8.0xmedian 10.7x 12.6xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 11.5x -28.7xmedian 11.5x 13.3xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 1.4x 1.6xmedian 1.4x 3.3xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 1.51median 1.51 —median 1.51 -29.17median 1.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLMBINGMNSIT
Revenue $711.77M $55.98B $8.58B
Gross profit $112.22M $3.72B $1.90B
Operating income $27.73M $992.13M $390.94M
Net income $20.53M $430.60M $210.48M
Free cash flow $41.00M -$231.59M $396.57M
EPS (diluted) $1.12 $1.85 $6.98
Cash & equivalents $56.56M $808.97M $363.48M
Total debt – $3.80B $1.48B
Shares (diluted) 18.30M 232.23M 30.17M
Enterprise value $415.38M $2.26B $3.55B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLMBINGMNSIT
P/E 28.7x 15.2x 25.4x
P/FCF 14.6x -28.7x 13.3x
P/Operating cash flow 14.1x -68.9x 12.4x
P/S 0.8x 0.1x 0.6x
P/B 4.8x 1.6x 3.3x
P/Tangible book 6.6x 1.8x 4.3x
EV/EBITDA 15.2x 8.0x 12.6x
EV/EBIT 19.6x 9.7x 16.3x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.2x 0.7x
EV/FCF 13.3x -41.6x 16.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.8x -99.8x 15.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.51 – -29.17

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLMBINGMNSIT
Revenue growth (1Y) 23.1% 11.5% 2.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 29.0% – -4.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.7% 7.9% 10.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.2% – 4.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) -15.9% 22.4% 28.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 21.2% – -0.8%
Net income growth (1Y) -7.1% 61.2% 40.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.6% – -7.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -8.2% 63.1% 49.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 19.0% – -0.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 127.9% 79.3% 75.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.9% – -16.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 189.6% 61.7% 97.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 13.5% – -16.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLMBINGMNSIT
Gross margin 15.8% 6.6% 22.1%
EBITDA margin 5.0% 2.1% 5.9%
Operating margin 3.9% 1.8% 4.6%
Pretax margin 3.9% 1.2% 3.5%
Net margin 2.9% 0.8% 2.5%
FCF margin 5.8% -0.4% 4.6%
Operating cash flow margin 6.0% -0.2% 4.9%
Return on equity 16.9% 10.2% 13.1%
Return on assets 4.5% 2.0% 2.0%
Return on invested capital 16.9% 8.2% 9.0%
Return on capital employed 20.9% 14.0% 11.9%
Asset turnover 1.5x 2.6x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x -0.2x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% 0.1% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLMBINGMNSIT
Debt / assets – 17.6% 12.9%
Debt / equity – 0.9x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.5x 2.2x
Debt / FCF – -16.4x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 73.0% 80.1% 85.9%
Equity / assets 27.0% 19.9% 14.1%
Interest coverage – 3.3x 4.1x
Current ratio 1.1x 1.3x 1.2x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.8x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.20 3.34 1.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLMBINGMNSIT
Dividend yield 0.1% 1.2% –
Net buyback yield 0.4% 1.6% 4.3%
Shareholder yield 0.5% 2.7% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 17.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -32.8% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 85.9% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLMBINGMNSIT
Forward P/E 24.0xFY2026 8.7xFY2026 13.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.34FY2026 $3.25FY2026 $13.19FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.5%FY2026 +12.1%FY2026 +33.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +39.6% +10.2% -2.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $714.50MFY2026 $55.78BFY2026 $8.47BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +9.5%FY2026 +6.1%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.9% +3.1% +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLMBINGMNSIT
Held by institutions 80.1% 100.0% 100.0%
Institutions holding 134 228 327
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.3% +1.0% +1.3%
Institutions buying 75 165 182
Institutions selling 45 44 110
Buyers to sellers 1.67 3.75 1.65

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLMBINGMNSIT
CLMB 1.00 0.12 0.23
INGM 0.12 1.00 0.37
NSIT 0.23 0.37 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLMB, INGM and NSIT?

Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) $600.13M, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) $6.65B, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) $5.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLMB, INGM and NSIT?

Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 28.7x, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 15.2x, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) 25.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) is cheapest (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 24.0x, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.7x, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) 13.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) +23.1%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +11.5%, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) +2.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) has the highest net margin (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 2.9%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.8%, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) 2.5%). On return on invested capital, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) leads (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 16.9%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.2%, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) 9.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Insight Enterprises (NSIT) returned the most: Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) -1.5%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +27.9%, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) +66.8%. Over five years, Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) compounded fastest (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) +37.1%/yr, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) +13.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) has the highest dividend yield: Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 0.13%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 1.17%. Insight Enterprises (NSIT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) has been the steadiest (Climb Global Solutions (CLMB) 51.1%, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 44.0%, Insight Enterprises (NSIT) 45.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLMB, INGM and NSIT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.