CLH vs RETO vs WM Stock Comparison

Clean Harbors, ReTo Eco-Solutions and Waste Management Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLH Clean Harbors Inc
$313.39 +0.0% 1M +27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$16.52B
P/E
31.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.56B
Div. yield
–
Hazardous Waste Industrials
5 wins
WM Waste Management Inc
$225.20 +9.1% 1M +10.3% 1Y
Market cap
$89.56B
P/E
29.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.07B
Div. yield
1.62%
Solid Waste Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 6, Clean Harbors 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLHRETOWMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.52B $28.51K $89.56B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.3x 0.0x 29.3x WM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.5x — 26.0x WM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.1% — +5.2% CLH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.0% — 11.8% WM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% — 11.4% WM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — 3.0x CLH
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 1.62% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.3% -96.1% +10.3% CLH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.7%/yr -87.2%/yr +7.0%/yr CLH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.8% 353.7% 21.4% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 72/100 — 53/100 CLH

Percentile Scorecard

CLHRETOWM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLHRETOWM
Valuation 60 #7 of 16 67 #6 of 16 53 #8 of 16
Growth 77 #4 of 14 – 62 #6 of 14
Profitability 85 #3 of 14 – 92 #2 of 14
Financial Health 67 #6 of 16 80 #4 of 16 7 #15 of 16
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 72 – 53
  • CLH ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • RETO ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLHRETOWMSPY
1 month +0.0%+464.3%+9.1% +0.9%
3 months -4.2%-69.4%-4.8% +5.9%
6 months +2.3%-68.7%-2.2% +8.5%
Year to date +33.7%-89.7%+2.5% +13.3%
1 year +27.3%-96.1%+10.3% +12.4%
3 years +107.5%-99.9%+39.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +27.6%-91.5%+11.8% +23.5%
5 years +178.5%-100.0%+40.5% +68.2%
5 years, per year +22.7%-87.2%+7.0% +11.0%
10 years +567.1%—+252.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year +20.9%—+13.4% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCLHRETOWMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.8%353.7%21.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.0%243.6%20.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.262.23-0.42 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.98-0.270.48 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.9%-100.0%-18.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.2%-96.1%-8.6% -0.9%
52-week high $327.10$20.40$246.51 $779.14
52-week low $201.73$0.09$196.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLHRETOWM
P/E now vs peer median 31.3xmedian 31.3x 0.0xmedian 31.3x 29.3xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 3.1x 0.1xmedian 3.1x 3.4xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x 14.5xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.0xmedian 16.9x 0.0xmedian 16.9x 23.9xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.7x 0.0xmedian 2.7x 9.1xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median 2.16median 2.37 —median 2.37 2.79median 2.37

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLHRETOWM
Revenue $6.56B – $26.07B
Gross profit $2.17B – $10.53B
Operating income $864.39M – $4.80B
Net income $528.36M – $3.07B
Free cash flow $500.54M – $3.74B
EPS (diluted) $9.99 – $7.68
Cash & equivalents $423.54M $250.01K $247.00M
Total debt $2.89B $13.30M $23.37B
Shares (diluted) 52.90M 5.97K 399.80M
Enterprise value $13.87B -$1.36M $88.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLHRETOWM
P/E 31.3x 0.0x 29.3x
P/FCF 33.0x 0.0x 23.9x
P/Operating cash flow 16.2x – 13.6x
P/S 2.5x 0.1x 3.4x
P/B 5.3x 0.0x 9.1x
P/Tangible book 7.3x 0.0x 14.2x
EV/EBITDA 14.2x – 14.5x
EV/EBIT 21.9x – 23.5x
EV/Revenue 2.9x – 4.3x
EV/FCF 37.8x – 30.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.5x – 17.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.16 – 2.79

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLHRETOWM
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.1% – 5.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.1% – 9.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.2% – -21.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.0% – 11.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 32.6% – 17.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.4% – 10.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 36.0% – 19.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.4% – 10.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.1% – 21.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.5% – 10.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.0% – 12.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% – 14.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 11.2% – 55.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.1% – 30.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLHRETOWM
Gross margin 33.1% – 40.4%
EBITDA margin 20.3% – 29.8%
Operating margin 13.2% – 18.4%
Pretax margin 10.9% – 14.9%
Net margin 8.0% – 11.8%
FCF margin 7.6% – 14.3%
Operating cash flow margin 15.5% – 25.2%
Return on equity 17.5% – 31.0%
Return on assets 6.6% – 6.6%
Return on invested capital 10.9% – 11.4%
Return on capital employed 12.8% – 12.0%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x – 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLHRETOWM
Debt / assets 34.9% 7.0% 50.2%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.1x 2.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – 3.0x
Debt / FCF 5.8x – 6.2x
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 22.3% 78.8%
Equity / assets 37.6% 77.7% 21.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.9x 0.2x 0.8x
Quick ratio 1.6x 24,122x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.0x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.77 – 2.89

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLHRETOWM
Dividend yield – – 1.6%
Net buyback yield 1.2% – 1.7%
Shareholder yield 1.2% – 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 48.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 39.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 13.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 9.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLHRETOWM
Forward P/E 30.5xFY2026 – 26.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.29FY2026 – $8.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.3%FY2026 – +15.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.3% – +9.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.28BFY2026 – $25.84BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 – +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% – +12.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLHRETOWM
Held by institutions 93.5% – 82.3%
Institutions holding 658 – 2,349
Change in shares held, QoQ 0.0% – +0.8%
Institutions buying 306 – 1,095
Institutions selling 246 – 901
Buyers to sellers 1.24 – 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLHRETOWM
CLH 1.00 0.08 0.28
RETO 0.08 1.00 0.05
WM 0.28 0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLH, RETO and WM?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Clean Harbors (CLH) $16.52B, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) $28.51K, Waste Management (WM) $89.56B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLH, RETO and WM?

Waste Management (WM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Clean Harbors (CLH) 31.3x, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) 0.0x, Waste Management (WM) 29.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Waste Management (WM) is cheapest (Clean Harbors (CLH) 30.5x, Waste Management (WM) 26.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Clean Harbors (CLH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Clean Harbors (CLH) +10.1%, Waste Management (WM) +5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Waste Management (WM) has the highest net margin (Clean Harbors (CLH) 8.0%, Waste Management (WM) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, Waste Management (WM) leads (Clean Harbors (CLH) 10.9%, Waste Management (WM) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clean Harbors (CLH) returned the most: Clean Harbors (CLH) +27.3%, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) -96.1%, Waste Management (WM) +10.3%. Over five years, Clean Harbors (CLH) compounded fastest (Clean Harbors (CLH) +22.7%/yr, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) -87.2%/yr, Waste Management (WM) +7.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Waste Management (WM) 1.62%. Clean Harbors (CLH) and ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Clean Harbors (CLH) 27.8%, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) 353.7%, Waste Management (WM) 21.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLH, RETO and WM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.