CLH vs RETO vs GFL Stock Comparison

Clean Harbors, ReTo Eco-Solutions and GFL Environmental Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLH Clean Harbors Inc
$313.39 +0.0% 1M +27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$16.52B
P/E
31.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.56B
Div. yield
–
Hazardous Waste Industrials
7 wins
GFL GFL Environmental Inc.
$43.57 +5.1% 1M -3.4% 1Y
Market cap
$16.16B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
0.18%
Solid Waste Industrials
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Clean Harbors leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Clean Harbors 7, GFL Environmental 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLHRETOGFLLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $16.52B $28.51K $16.16B CLH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 31.3x 0.0x -71.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 30.5x — 70.3x CLH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +10.1% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.0% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.9% — 9.7% CLH
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.8x — -0.1x GFL
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.18% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.3% -96.1% -3.4% CLH
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +22.7%/yr -87.2%/yr +1.2%/yr CLH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.8% 353.7% 29.2% CLH
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 72/100 — 57/100 CLH

Percentile Scorecard

CLHRETOGFL

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLHRETOGFL
Valuation 60 #7 of 16 67 #6 of 16 87 #3 of 16
Growth 77 #4 of 14 – 15 #12 of 14
Profitability 85 #3 of 14 – 39 #9 of 14
Financial Health 67 #6 of 16 80 #4 of 16 87 #3 of 16
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 72 – 57
  • CLH ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • RETO ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management
  • GFL ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLHRETOGFLSPY
1 month +0.0%+464.3%+5.1% +0.9%
3 months -4.2%-69.4%+8.2% +5.9%
6 months +2.3%-68.7%+8.0% +8.5%
Year to date +33.7%-89.7%+1.4% +13.3%
1 year +27.3%-96.1%-3.4% +12.4%
3 years +107.5%-99.9%+54.5% +88.1%
3 years, per year +27.6%-91.5%+15.6% +23.5%
5 years +178.5%-100.0%+5.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year +22.7%-87.2%+1.2% +11.0%
10 years +567.1%—— +263.4%
10 years, per year +20.9%—— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCLHRETOGFLSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.8%353.7%29.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.0%243.6%28.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.262.230.24 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.98-0.27-0.12 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.9%-100.0%-42.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.2%-96.1%-6.3% -0.9%
52-week high $327.10$20.40$46.51 $779.14
52-week low $201.73$0.09$33.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLHRETOGFL
P/E now vs peer median 31.3xmedian 31.3x 0.0xmedian 31.3x -71.8xmedian 31.3x
P/S now vs peer median 2.5xmedian 3.1x 0.1xmedian 3.1x 2.3xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.2xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x 4.9xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 33.0xmedian 16.9x 0.0xmedian 16.9x 5.6xmedian 16.9x
P/B now vs peer median 5.3xmedian 2.7x 0.0xmedian 2.7x 1.4xmedian 2.7x
PEG now vs peer median 2.16median 2.37 —median 2.37 1.01median 2.37

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLHRETOGFL
Revenue $6.56B – –
Gross profit $2.17B – –
Operating income $864.39M – $1.72B
Net income $528.36M – -$385.60M
Free cash flow $500.54M – $2.88B
EPS (diluted) $9.99 – $-0.59
Cash & equivalents $423.54M $250.01K $296.50M
Total debt $2.89B $13.30M $14.20M
Shares (diluted) 52.90M 5.97K 378.69M
Enterprise value $13.87B -$1.36M $14.35B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLHRETOGFL
P/E 31.3x 0.0x -71.8x
P/FCF 33.0x 0.0x 5.6x
P/Operating cash flow 16.2x – 9.4x
P/S 2.5x 0.1x 2.3x
P/B 5.3x 0.0x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 7.3x 0.0x 1.7x
EV/EBITDA 14.2x – 4.9x
EV/EBIT 21.9x – 9.2x
EV/Revenue 2.9x – –
EV/FCF 37.8x – 5.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.5x – 9.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.16 – 1.01

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLHRETOGFL
Revenue growth (1Y) 10.1% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.1% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.2% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 10.0% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 32.6% – -0.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 13.4% – -7.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 36.0% – -110.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 13.4% – -45.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 38.1% – -106.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 14.5% – -70.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 25.0% – 25.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.1% – -1.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 11.2% – 11.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.1% – 0.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLHRETOGFL
Gross margin 33.1% – –
EBITDA margin 20.3% – –
Operating margin 13.2% – –
Pretax margin 10.9% – –
Net margin 8.0% – –
FCF margin 7.6% – –
Operating cash flow margin 15.5% – –
Return on equity 17.5% – -4.0%
Return on assets 6.6% – -1.5%
Return on invested capital 10.9% – 9.7%
Return on capital employed 12.8% – 7.6%
Asset turnover 0.8x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x – -4.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.7% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLHRETOGFL
Debt / assets 34.9% 7.0% 0.0%
Debt / equity 0.9x 0.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.8x – -0.1x
Debt / FCF 5.8x – 0.0x
Liabilities / assets 62.4% 22.3% 59.0%
Equity / assets 37.6% 77.7% 41.0%
Interest coverage – – 2.8x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.2x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.6x 24,122x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.0x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3.77 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLHRETOGFL
Dividend yield – – 0.2%
Net buyback yield 1.2% – –
Shareholder yield 1.2% – 0.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLHRETOGFL
Forward P/E 30.5xFY2026 – 70.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.29FY2026 – $0.62FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +41.3%FY2026 – +12.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +5.3% – +27.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.28BFY2026 – $6.10BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.1%FY2026 – +26.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +15.7% – +22.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLHRETOGFL
Held by institutions 93.5% – 74.8%
Institutions holding 658 – 323
Change in shares held, QoQ 0.0% – +10.3%
Institutions buying 306 – 185
Institutions selling 246 – 101
Buyers to sellers 1.24 – 1.83

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLHRETOGFL
CLH 1.00 0.08 0.31
RETO 0.08 1.00 0.12
GFL 0.31 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLH, RETO and GFL?

Clean Harbors (CLH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Clean Harbors (CLH) $16.52B, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) $28.51K, GFL Environmental (GFL) $16.16B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Clean Harbors (CLH) returned the most: Clean Harbors (CLH) +27.3%, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) -96.1%, GFL Environmental (GFL) -3.4%. Over five years, Clean Harbors (CLH) compounded fastest (Clean Harbors (CLH) +22.7%/yr, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) -87.2%/yr, GFL Environmental (GFL) +1.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: GFL Environmental (GFL) 0.18%. Clean Harbors (CLH) and ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Clean Harbors (CLH) has been the steadiest (Clean Harbors (CLH) 27.8%, ReTo Eco-Solutions (RETO) 353.7%, GFL Environmental (GFL) 29.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLH, RETO and GFL?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Clean Harbors (CLH) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.