CLF vs GWAV vs CMC Stock Comparison

Cleveland-Cliffs, Greenwave Technology Solutions and Commercial Metals Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
$13.90 +14.0% 1M +0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$7.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$20.07B
Div. yield
–
Steel Basic Materials
2 wins
CMC COMMERCIAL METALS Co
$63.63 -3.2% 1M +5.3% 1Y
Market cap
$6.94B
P/E
10.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.39B
Div. yield
0.01%
Steel Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Commercial Metals leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Commercial Metals 5, Cleveland-Cliffs 2, Greenwave Technology Solutions 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLFGWAVCMCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.71B $1.88M $6.94B CLF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -16.3x -0.1x 10.6x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — 9.8x –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +71.8% +20.5% GWAV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.4% -27.7% 7.0% CMC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.3% — -79.6% CLF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 9.8x -2.1x -0.4x GWAV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.01% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +0.9% -71.4% +5.3% CMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -10.7%/yr -90.6%/yr +14.8%/yr CMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.3% 103.2% 35.6% CMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 37/100 54/100 CMC

Percentile Scorecard

CLFGWAVCMC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLFGWAVCMC
Valuation 65 #57 of 162 39 #99 of 162 76 #39 of 162
Growth 40 #89 of 147 65 #52 of 147 53 #69 of 147
Profitability 37 #77 of 122 31 #85 of 122 50 #61 of 122
Financial Health 11 #146 of 164 13 #143 of 164 18 #135 of 164
Shareholder Returns – – 73 #30 of 107
Overall 38 37 54
  • CLF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • GWAV ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • CMC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLFGWAVCMCSPY
1 month +14.0%-7.1%-3.2% -0.2%
3 months +16.1%-10.5%-9.7% +3.9%
6 months +36.0%-42.6%-7.7% +8.2%
Year to date +4.7%-57.6%-8.1% +12.9%
1 year +0.9%-71.4%+5.3% +12.3%
3 years -13.3%-100.0%+52.2% +87.4%
3 years, per year -4.7%-93.8%+15.0% +23.3%
5 years -43.1%-100.0%+99.0% +67.9%
5 years, per year -10.7%-90.6%+14.8% +10.9%
10 years +174.2%-100.0%+302.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year +10.6%-76.1%+14.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCLFGWAVCMCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.3%103.2%35.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.3%106.0%35.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.120.901.37 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.01-0.690.15 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.4%-100.0%-38.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.9%-72.2%-23.5% -1.2%
52-week high $15.09$8.00$83.21 $779.14
52-week low $7.82$2.22$56.52 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLFGWAVCMC
P/E now vs peer median -16.8xmedian 13.3x -0.1xmedian 13.3x 10.8xmedian 13.3x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 3.2x 0.0xmedian 3.2x 0.7xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 20.1xmedian 7.3x -2.5xmedian 7.3x -1.5xmedian 7.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -16.4xmedian 14.7x -0.5xmedian 14.7x 14.7xmedian 14.7x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.2x 0.1xmedian 2.2x 1.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.35median 0.31 0.00median 0.31 -1.57median 0.31

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLFGWAVCMC
Revenue $20.07B $60.56M $9.39B
Gross profit $309.00M $19.15M $1.75B
Operating income -$282.00M -$15.21M -$6.93B
Net income -$460.00M -$16.76M $655.85M
Free cash flow -$485.00M -$3.45M $479.12M
EPS (diluted) $-0.82 $-20.20 $5.86
Cash & equivalents $77.00M $654.99K –
Total debt $7.65B $33.77M $3.41B
Shares (diluted) 574.00M 829.63K 111.86M
Enterprise value $7.46B -$2.62M $6.16B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLFGWAVCMC
P/E -16.8x -0.1x 10.8x
P/FCF -16.4x -0.5x 14.7x
P/Operating cash flow 68.4x -0.9x 6.6x
P/S 0.4x 0.0x 0.7x
P/B 1.3x 0.1x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 0.2x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 20.1x -2.5x -1.5x
EV/EBIT -55.0x -0.8x -1.4x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 0.2x 1.0x
EV/FCF -32.0x -3.5x 20.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 133.6x -5.7x 9.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.35 0.00 -1.57

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLFGWAVCMC
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 71.8% 20.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 23.9% 2.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 133.3% 46.8% 43.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -35.7% 16.4% -1.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 83.5% 51.0% -7.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.2% -3.4% -5.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 72.7% 48.8% 674.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -48.0% 8.7% -8.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 75.7% 69.1% 690.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -47.9% -64.7% -6.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 112.6% 65.6% 48.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -61.9% 0.4% -7.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.6% 79.3% 53.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.9% 19.0% -13.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLFGWAVCMC
Gross margin 1.5% 31.6% 18.6%
EBITDA margin 3.8% -8.1% -69.6%
Operating margin -1.4% -25.1% -73.8%
Pretax margin -3.4% -27.7% 7.6%
Net margin -2.4% -27.7% 7.0%
FCF margin -2.4% -5.7% 5.1%
Operating cash flow margin 0.6% -3.5% 11.3%
Return on equity -7.3% -73.5% 14.2%
Return on assets -2.1% -31.4% 6.5%
Return on invested capital -1.3% – -79.6%
Return on capital employed -1.7% -64.6% -82.5%
Asset turnover 1.0x 1.1x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x 0.1x 1.6x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLFGWAVCMC
Debt / assets 37.6% 20.6% 33.2%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.5x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 9.8x -2.1x -0.4x
Debt / FCF -15.8x -3.1x 7.1x
Liabilities / assets 70.7% 59.8% 54.2%
Equity / assets 29.3% 40.2% 45.8%
Interest coverage – -10.0x -48.4x
Current ratio 1.9x 0.2x 2.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.1x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.5x
Altman Z-score 1.42 -14.24 0.39

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLFGWAVCMC
Dividend yield – – 1.2%
Net buyback yield – – 1.5%
Shareholder yield 0.0% – 2.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 12.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 17.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.5%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 4.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLFGWAVCMC
Forward P/E – – 9.8xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 – $6.49FY2027
EPS growth, next FY – – -4.8%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after – – +10.9%
Revenue, next fiscal year $21.93BFY2026 – $9.59BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +17.8%FY2026 – +2.1%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% – +4.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLFGWAVCMC
Held by institutions 83.1% 1.8% 93.1%
Institutions holding 583 7 520
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% -52.2% +0.2%
Institutions buying 279 2 262
Institutions selling 191 1 175
Buyers to sellers 1.46 2.00 1.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLFGWAVCMC
CLF 1.00 0.04 0.52
GWAV 0.04 1.00 0.02
CMC 0.52 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLF, GWAV and CMC?

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) $7.71B, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) $1.88M, Commercial Metals (CMC) $6.94B.

Which company is growing faster?

Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) +7.8%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) +71.8%, Commercial Metals (CMC) +20.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Commercial Metals (CMC) has the highest net margin (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) -2.4%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) -27.7%, Commercial Metals (CMC) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) leads (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) -1.3%, Commercial Metals (CMC) -79.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Commercial Metals (CMC) returned the most: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) +0.9%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) -71.4%, Commercial Metals (CMC) +5.3%. Over five years, Commercial Metals (CMC) compounded fastest (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) -10.7%/yr, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) -90.6%/yr, Commercial Metals (CMC) +14.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) 0.00%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) 0.00%, Commercial Metals (CMC) 0.01%. Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) and Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Commercial Metals (CMC) has been the steadiest (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) 67.3%, Greenwave Technology Solutions (GWAV) 103.2%, Commercial Metals (CMC) 35.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLF, GWAV and CMC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Commercial Metals (CMC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.