CLF vs CMC vs SIM Stock Comparison

Cleveland-Cliffs, Commercial Metals and GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CLF Cleveland-Cliffs Inc.
$13.37 +9.7% 1M +1.8% 1Y
Market cap
$7.95B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$20.07B
Div. yield
–
Steel Basic Materials
2 wins
CMC COMMERCIAL METALS Co
$62.44 -5.0% 1M +2.2% 1Y
Market cap
$7.04B
P/E
10.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.39B
Div. yield
0.01%
Steel Basic Materials
9 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Commercial Metals leads on 9 of the 12 questions below (Commercial Metals 9, Cleveland-Cliffs 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLFCMCSIMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.95B $7.04B $3.97B CLF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -16.8x 10.7x 50.9x CMC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 9.6x 18.1x CMC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +20.5% — CMC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -2.4% 7.0% — CMC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -1.3% -79.6% — CLF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 9.8x -0.4x — CMC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +1.8% +2.2% -6.9% CMC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -11.6%/yr +14.8%/yr -0.5%/yr CMC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 67.3% 35.6% 44.0% CMC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 38/100 55/100 — CMC

Percentile Scorecard

CLFCMCSIM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLFCMCSIM
Valuation 65 #57 of 162 76 #39 of 162 71 #48 of 162
Growth 40 #89 of 147 55 #67 of 147 –
Profitability 37 #77 of 122 51 #60 of 122 –
Financial Health 11 #147 of 165 18 #136 of 165 80 #34 of 165
Shareholder Returns – 73 #30 of 107 –
Overall 38 55 –
  • CLF ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • CMC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SIM ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLFCMCSIMSPY
1 month +9.7%-5.0%-10.4% -0.8%
3 months +9.1%-8.3%-2.8% +3.5%
6 months +26.0%-10.2%-15.8% +7.0%
Year to date +0.7%-9.8%-12.8% +12.2%
1 year +1.8%+2.2%-6.9% +13.0%
3 years -16.6%+49.4%-15.9% +86.3%
3 years, per year -5.9%+14.3%-5.6% +23.1%
5 years -46.1%+99.2%-2.7% +68.6%
5 years, per year -11.6%+14.8%-0.5% +11.0%
10 years +115.6%+279.6%+145.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +8.0%+14.3%+9.4% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCLFCMCSIMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 67.3%35.6%44.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.3%35.3%85.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.111.360.29 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.030.06-0.16 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -82.4%-38.1%-40.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.4%-25.0%-24.7% -1.8%
52-week high $15.09$83.21$34.35 $779.14
52-week low $7.82$56.52$25.82 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLFCMCSIM
P/E now vs peer median -16.2xmedian 12.8x 10.6xmedian 12.8x 50.9xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 3.1x 0.7xmedian 3.1x 2.7xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 19.7xmedian 7.0x -1.5xmedian 7.0x —median 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -15.7xmedian 15.2x 14.4xmedian 15.2x -34.7xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 2.1x 1.5xmedian 2.1x 1.3xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median 0.34median 0.29 -1.55median 0.29 —median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLFCMCSIM
Revenue $20.07B $9.39B –
Gross profit $309.00M $1.75B –
Operating income -$282.00M -$6.93B –
Net income -$460.00M $655.85M –
Free cash flow -$485.00M $479.12M –
EPS (diluted) $-0.82 $5.86 –
Cash & equivalents $77.00M – $1.59B
Total debt $7.65B $3.41B $67.31M
Shares (diluted) 574.00M 111.86M –
Enterprise value $7.70B $6.27B -$5.01B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLFCMCSIM
P/E -16.2x 10.6x 50.9x
P/FCF -15.7x 14.4x -34.7x
P/Operating cash flow 65.8x 6.5x –
P/S 0.4x 0.7x 2.7x
P/B 1.3x 1.5x 1.3x
P/Tangible book 1.5x 1.6x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 19.7x -1.5x –
EV/EBIT -53.9x -1.4x –
EV/Revenue 0.8x 1.0x –
EV/FCF -31.3x 19.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow 131.0x 9.0x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.34 -1.55 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLFCMCSIM
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 20.5% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.9% 2.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 133.3% 43.6% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -35.7% -1.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 83.5% -7.1% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -35.2% -5.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) 72.7% 674.7% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -48.0% -8.6% –
EPS growth (1Y) 75.7% 690.1% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -47.9% -6.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 112.6% 48.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -61.9% -7.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 68.6% 53.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -32.9% -13.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLFCMCSIM
Gross margin 1.5% 18.6% –
EBITDA margin 3.8% -69.6% –
Operating margin -1.4% -73.8% –
Pretax margin -3.4% 7.6% –
Net margin -2.4% 7.0% –
FCF margin -2.4% 5.1% –
Operating cash flow margin 0.6% 11.3% –
Return on equity -7.3% 14.2% –
Return on assets -2.1% 6.5% –
Return on invested capital -1.3% -79.6% –
Return on capital employed -1.7% -82.5% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.3x 1.6x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLFCMCSIM
Debt / assets 37.6% 33.2% 1.7%
Debt / equity 1.3x 0.7x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 9.8x -0.4x –
Debt / FCF -15.8x 7.1x –
Liabilities / assets 70.7% 54.2% 16.9%
Equity / assets 29.3% 45.8% 83.1%
Interest coverage – -48.4x –
Current ratio 1.9x 2.3x 5.3x
Quick ratio 0.6x 1.4x 4.0x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.5x 3.4x
Altman Z-score 1.40 0.38 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLFCMCSIM
Dividend yield – 1.2% –
Net buyback yield – 1.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.0% 2.7% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 12.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 17.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 4.0% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLFCMCSIM
Forward P/E – 9.6xFY2027 18.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.01FY2026 $6.49FY2027 $1.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -4.8%FY2027 +181.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +10.9% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $21.93BFY2026 $9.59BFY2027 –
Revenue growth, next FY +17.8%FY2026 +2.1%FY2027 –
Revenue growth, the year after +1.2% +4.9% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLFCMCSIM
Held by institutions 83.1% 93.1% 0.1%
Institutions holding 583 520 12
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.4% +0.2% -0.3%
Institutions buying 279 262 1
Institutions selling 191 175 3
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.50 0.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLFCMCSIM
CLF 1.00 0.52 0.05
CMC 0.52 1.00 0.12
SIM 0.05 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CLF, CMC and SIM?

Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) $7.95B, Commercial Metals (CMC) $7.04B, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) $3.97B.

Which stock is cheaper, CLF, CMC and SIM?

Commercial Metals (CMC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) -16.8x, Commercial Metals (CMC) 10.7x, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 50.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Commercial Metals (CMC) is cheapest (Commercial Metals (CMC) 9.6x, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 18.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Commercial Metals (CMC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) +7.8%, Commercial Metals (CMC) +20.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Commercial Metals (CMC) has the highest net margin (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) -2.4%, Commercial Metals (CMC) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) leads (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) -1.3%, Commercial Metals (CMC) -79.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Commercial Metals (CMC) returned the most: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) +1.8%, Commercial Metals (CMC) +2.2%, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) -6.9%. Over five years, Commercial Metals (CMC) compounded fastest (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) -11.6%/yr, Commercial Metals (CMC) +14.8%/yr, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) -0.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) 0.00%, Commercial Metals (CMC) 0.01%, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 0.00%. Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) and GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Commercial Metals (CMC) has been the steadiest (Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF) 67.3%, Commercial Metals (CMC) 35.6%, GRUPO SIMEC, S.A.B. de C.V (SIM) 44.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CLF, CMC and SIM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Commercial Metals (CMC) leads on 9. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.