CL vs PRGO vs KMB Stock Comparison

Colgate Palmolive, Perrigo and Kimberly Clark Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CL Colgate Palmolive Co
$94.02 +9.4% 1M +19.9% 1Y
Market cap
$74.31B
P/E
36.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$21.05B
Div. yield
0.02%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
7 wins
PRGO PERRIGO Co plc
$15.95 +15.2% 1M -25.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.20B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.14B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
2 wins
KMB Kimberly Clark Corp
$110.15 +12.7% 1M -7.2% 1Y
Market cap
$36.43B
P/E
18.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.58B
Div. yield
0.05%
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Colgate Palmolive leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Colgate Palmolive 7, Kimberly Clark 3, Perrigo 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCLPRGOKMBLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $74.31B $2.20B $36.43B CL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.5x -1.3x 18.6x KMB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 25.1x 6.8x 14.5x PRGO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.2% -4.2% +0.7% CL
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 9.7% -41.9% 11.8% KMB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 27.2% -26.2% 19.4% CL
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.7x -2.3x 1.7x PRGO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.00% 0.05% KMB
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.9% -25.8% -7.2% CL
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.5%/yr -19.0%/yr -3.7%/yr CL
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 23.2% 57.4% 29.4% CL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 38/100 54/100 CL

Percentile Scorecard

CLPRGOKMB

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCLPRGOKMB
Valuation 45 #28 of 50 43 #29 of 50 51 #25 of 50
Growth 54 #23 of 49 4 #47 of 49 44 #28 of 49
Profitability 95 #3 of 44 19 #36 of 44 81 #9 of 44
Financial Health 50 #28 of 55 32 #38 of 55 39 #34 of 55
Shareholder Returns 50 #16 of 31 93 #3 of 31 53 #15 of 31
Overall 59 38 54
  • CL ranked among 59 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • PRGO ranked among 59 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • KMB ranked among 59 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCLPRGOKMBSPY
1 month +9.4%+15.2%+12.7% -1.0%
3 months +3.6%+58.1%+0.4% +2.9%
6 months +11.1%+34.9%+12.6% +6.4%
Year to date +19.0%+14.6%+9.2% +11.4%
1 year +19.9%-25.8%-7.2% +13.1%
3 years +29.1%-45.5%-8.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +8.9%-18.3%-3.0% +21.5%
5 years +24.5%-65.0%-17.2% +67.7%
5 years, per year +4.5%-19.0%-3.7% +10.9%
10 years +32.6%-82.3%-7.9% +255.2%
10 years, per year +2.9%-15.9%-0.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureCLPRGOKMBSPY
Volatility, 1Y 23.2%57.4%29.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 22.1%59.6%33.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.151.040.04 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.85-0.45-0.25 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -31.1%-80.7%-37.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.2%-27.3%-8.7% -2.5%
52-week high $99.14$21.94$120.66 $779.14
52-week low $74.98$9.25$93.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCLPRGOKMB
P/E now vs peer median 36.9xmedian 18.7x -1.3xmedian 18.7x 18.7xmedian 18.7x
P/S now vs peer median 3.6xmedian 1.6x 0.5xmedian 1.6x 2.2xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 21.6xmedian 13.0x -4.1xmedian 13.0x 13.0xmedian 13.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 19.0x 18.5xmedian 19.0x 20.1xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 132.4xmedian 2.3x 0.9xmedian 2.3x 19.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 3.04median 0.97 0.01median 0.97 2.85median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCLPRGOKMB
Revenue $21.05B $4.14B $16.58B
Gross profit $12.72B $1.38B $6.10B
Operating income $3.13B -$1.56B $2.51B
Net income $2.16B -$1.73B $1.99B
Free cash flow $3.86B $119.30M $1.82B
R&D – $95.00M –
EPS (diluted) $2.54 $-12.43 $5.87
Cash & equivalents $1.37B $399.70M $956.00M
Total debt $7.86B $14.21B $28.07B
Shares (diluted) 801.80M 139.60M 333.30M
Enterprise value $69.04B $480.66M $33.63B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCLPRGOKMB
P/E 36.9x -1.3x 18.7x
P/FCF 19.4x 18.5x 20.1x
P/Operating cash flow 16.8x 11.3x 11.0x
P/S 3.6x 0.5x 2.2x
P/B 132.4x 0.9x 19.5x
P/Tangible book -80.7x 6.8x 20.3x
EV/EBITDA 21.6x -4.1x 13.0x
EV/EBIT 26.0x -3.3x 16.8x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 1.2x 2.5x
EV/FCF 21.1x 42.8x 23.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 18.3x 26.0x 12.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 3.04 0.01 2.85

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCLPRGOKMB
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.2% -4.2% 0.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.1% -3.6% -6.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.0% -10.8% 2.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 6.2% -4.6% -2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -26.9% -644.9% -5.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.1% -123.9% 3.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -29.2% -2,060% -18.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.9% -194.8% 6.5%
EPS growth (1Y) -29.0% -2,039% -19.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 12.2% -192.7% 6.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 13.7% -46.5% 16.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 12.9% -14.8% 1.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 14.5% -53.5% -13.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.9% -20.4% -8.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCLPRGOKMB
Gross margin 60.4% 33.3% 36.8%
EBITDA margin 17.9% -29.8% 19.5%
Operating margin 14.9% -37.7% 15.2%
Pretax margin 14.0% -38.9% 13.5%
Net margin 9.7% -41.9% 11.8%
FCF margin 18.3% 2.9% 11.0%
Operating cash flow margin 21.2% 4.7% 20.1%
Return on equity 410.8% -69.2% 105.0%
Return on assets 12.9% -22.3% 11.1%
Return on invested capital 27.2% -26.2% 19.4%
Return on capital employed 29.7% -23.2% 23.1%
Asset turnover 1.3x 0.5x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x -0.1x 1.7x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 1.1% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCLPRGOKMB
Debt / assets 46.8% 43.3% 35.1%
Debt / equity 13.9x 1.3x 3.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.7x -2.3x 1.7x
Debt / FCF 2.0x 27.6x 3.6x
Liabilities / assets 96.6% 66.9% 89.9%
Equity / assets 3.4% 33.1% 10.1%
Interest coverage 12.3x – 10.7x
Current ratio 1.0x 2.3x 0.9x
Quick ratio 0.5x 1.1x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 6.91 -0.39 3.35

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCLPRGOKMB
Dividend yield 2.2% 7.3% 4.6%
Net buyback yield 1.5% – 0.0%
Shareholder yield 3.7% 7.3% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) 84.3% – 84.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) 47.2% – 92.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.1% – 2.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.9% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCLPRGOKMB
Forward P/E 25.1xFY2026 6.8xFY2026 14.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.75FY2026 $2.34FY2026 $7.61FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +1.6%FY2026 -14.9%FY2026 +1.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +11.7% -1.3% -7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $22.42BFY2026 $4.21BFY2026 $16.98BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +10.0%FY2026 -0.9%FY2026 +3.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +2.1% -0.8% +5.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCLPRGOKMB
Held by institutions 83.8% 100.0% 96.8%
Institutions holding 2,015 338 1,710
Change in shares held, QoQ 0.0% +6.4% +9.1%
Institutions buying 919 194 827
Institutions selling 720 92 620
Buyers to sellers 1.28 2.11 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CLPRGOKMB
CL 1.00 0.23 0.60
PRGO 0.23 1.00 0.28
KMB 0.60 0.28 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CL, PRGO and KMB?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Colgate Palmolive (CL) $74.31B, Perrigo (PRGO) $2.20B, Kimberly Clark (KMB) $36.43B.

Which stock is cheaper, CL, PRGO and KMB?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Colgate Palmolive (CL) 36.5x, Perrigo (PRGO) -1.3x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 18.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Perrigo (PRGO) is cheapest (Colgate Palmolive (CL) 25.1x, Perrigo (PRGO) 6.8x, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 14.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Colgate Palmolive (CL) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Colgate Palmolive (CL) +5.2%, Perrigo (PRGO) -4.2%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) +0.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest net margin (Colgate Palmolive (CL) 9.7%, Perrigo (PRGO) -41.9%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, Colgate Palmolive (CL) leads (Colgate Palmolive (CL) 27.2%, Perrigo (PRGO) -26.2%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 19.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Colgate Palmolive (CL) returned the most: Colgate Palmolive (CL) +19.9%, Perrigo (PRGO) -25.8%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -7.2%. Over five years, Colgate Palmolive (CL) compounded fastest (Colgate Palmolive (CL) +4.5%/yr, Perrigo (PRGO) -19.0%/yr, Kimberly Clark (KMB) -3.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Kimberly Clark (KMB) has the highest dividend yield: Colgate Palmolive (CL) 0.02%, Perrigo (PRGO) 0.00%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 0.05%. Perrigo (PRGO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Colgate Palmolive (CL) has been the steadiest (Colgate Palmolive (CL) 23.2%, Perrigo (PRGO) 57.4%, Kimberly Clark (KMB) 29.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CL, PRGO and KMB?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Colgate Palmolive (CL) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.