CKX vs PETZ vs RNGE Stock Comparison

Ckx Lands, TDH Holdings and Range Impact Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CKX Ckx Lands, Inc.
$10.50 -1.9% 1M -0.5% 1Y
Market cap
$21.56M
P/E
7.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$693.40K
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
1 win
PETZ TDH Holdings, Inc.
$1.21 -11.7% 1M +14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$12.49M
P/E
6.9x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
1 win
RNGE Range Impact, Inc.
$0.56 -26.3% 1M +250.0% 1Y
Market cap
$68.16M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
3 wins

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Range Impact leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Range Impact 3, TDH Holdings 1, Ckx Lands 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCKXPETZRNGELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $21.56M $12.49M $68.16M RNGE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7.4x 6.9x — PETZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -17.1% — — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 419.8% — — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -0.5% +14.2% +250.0% RNGE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.4%/yr -48.8%/yr +13.3%/yr RNGE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.5% 88.0% 131.5% CKX
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 — — –

Percentile Scorecard

CKXPETZRNGE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCKXPETZRNGE
Valuation 61 #16 of 39 53 #19 of 39 –
Growth 58 #14 of 32 – –
Profitability 64 #11 of 29 – –
Financial Health 100 #1 of 38 95 #3 of 38 –
Shareholder Returns – – –
Overall 71 – –
  • CKX ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • PETZ ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • RNGE ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCKXPETZRNGESPY
1 month -1.9%-11.7%-26.3% +0.9%
3 months -2.8%+4.3%-41.7% +5.9%
6 months -8.5%+20.6%+211.1% +8.5%
Year to date +14.8%+33.0%+273.3% +13.3%
1 year -0.5%+14.2%+250.0% +12.4%
3 years -17.1%+0.4%+250.0% +88.1%
3 years, per year -6.0%+0.1%+51.9% +23.5%
5 years -11.5%-96.5%+86.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year -2.4%-48.8%+13.3% +11.0%
10 years -3.7%—-60.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year -0.4%—-9.0% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureCKXPETZRNGESPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.5%88.0%131.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 51.5%75.9%154.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.380.061.27 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.010.161.90 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -37.0%-99.4%-73.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -14.8%-28.8%-41.7% -0.9%
52-week high $12.33$1.70$0.96 $779.14
52-week low $9.10$0.81$0.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCKXPETZRNGE
P/E now vs peer median 7.4xmedian 7.8x 6.9xmedian 7.8x —median 7.8x
P/S now vs peer median 31.1xmedian 4.9x 10.0xmedian 4.9x —median 4.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 11.2x —median 11.2x —median 11.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -218.6xmedian 6.2x -6.2xmedian 6.2x —median 6.2x
P/B now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 0.6x 0.4xmedian 0.6x —median 0.6x
PEG now vs peer median 0.11median 0.32 —median 0.32 —median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCKXPETZRNGE
Revenue $693.40K – –
Gross profit $661.65K – –
Operating income $3.32M – –
Net income $2.91M – –
Free cash flow -$98.62K – –
EPS (diluted) $1.42 – –
Cash & equivalents $17.55M $19.14M –
Shares (diluted) 2.05M 10.32M 115.42M
Enterprise value -$41.97M -$106.68M $68.16M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCKXPETZRNGE
P/E 7.4x 6.9x –
P/FCF -218.6x -6.2x –
P/Operating cash flow -218.6x – –
P/S 31.1x 10.0x –
P/B 1.0x 0.4x –
P/Tangible book 1.0x 0.4x –
EV/EBITDA 1.2x – –
EV/EBIT 1.2x – –
EV/Revenue 5.8x – –
EV/FCF -40.7x – –
EV/Operating cash flow -40.7x – –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.11 – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCKXPETZRNGE
Revenue growth (1Y) -17.1% – –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -15.5% – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -13.4% – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -14.8% – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 1,750% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 57.0% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 702.1% – –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 64.7% – –
EPS growth (1Y) 700.4% – –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 68.0% – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -78.9% – –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.1% – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -78.9% – –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.1% – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCKXPETZRNGE
Gross margin 95.4% – –
EBITDA margin 478.8% – –
Operating margin 478.4% – –
Pretax margin 542.1% – –
Net margin 419.8% – –
FCF margin -14.2% – –
Operating cash flow margin -14.2% – –
Return on equity 13.5% – –
Return on assets 13.2% – –
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed 15.1% – –
Asset turnover 0.0x – –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x – –
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCKXPETZRNGE
Debt / assets – – –
Debt / equity – – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 1.1% 23.8% –
Equity / assets 98.9% 76.2% –
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 124.6x 5.1x –
Quick ratio 124.1x 5.0x –
Cash ratio 123.9x 5.0x –
Altman Z-score 54.12 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCKXPETZRNGE
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 0.0% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCKXPETZRNGE

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CKXPETZRNGE
CKX 1.00 0.06 0.06
PETZ 0.06 1.00 -0.07
RNGE 0.06 -0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CKX, PETZ and RNGE?

Range Impact (RNGE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ckx Lands (CKX) $21.56M, TDH Holdings (PETZ) $12.49M, Range Impact (RNGE) $68.16M.

Which stock is cheaper, CKX, PETZ and RNGE?

TDH Holdings (PETZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ckx Lands (CKX) 7.4x, TDH Holdings (PETZ) 6.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Range Impact (RNGE) returned the most: Ckx Lands (CKX) -0.5%, TDH Holdings (PETZ) +14.2%, Range Impact (RNGE) +250.0%. Over five years, Range Impact (RNGE) compounded fastest (Ckx Lands (CKX) -2.4%/yr, TDH Holdings (PETZ) -48.8%/yr, Range Impact (RNGE) +13.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Ckx Lands (CKX) has been the steadiest (Ckx Lands (CKX) 46.5%, TDH Holdings (PETZ) 88.0%, Range Impact (RNGE) 131.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CKX, PETZ and RNGE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Range Impact (RNGE) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.