CIEN vs FKWL vs CSCO Stock Comparison

Ciena, Franklin Wireless and Cisco Systems Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (NN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CIEN Ciena Corp
$299.99 -23.3% 1M +58.3% 1Y
Market cap
$38.28B
P/E
58.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.02B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
5 wins
FKWL Franklin Wireless Corp
$2.15 -10.0% 1M -58.2% 1Y
Market cap
$24.98M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$36.51M
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
1 win
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc.
$102.97 -8.2% 1M +38.3% 1Y
Market cap
$407.26B
P/E
30.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$63.33B
Div. yield
–
Networking Equipment Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Cisco Systems leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Cisco Systems 5, Ciena 5, Franklin Wireless 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCIENFKWLCSCOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $38.28B $24.98M $407.26B CSCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 58.5x -5.3x 30.7x CSCO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 39.5x 53.8x 21.7x CSCO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +32.6% -20.8% +11.8% CIEN
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 10.9% -13.0% 21.0% CSCO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 12.4% — 15.9% CSCO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.7x — 0.8x CIEN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +58.3% -58.2% +38.3% CIEN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +37.6%/yr -16.8%/yr +12.5%/yr CIEN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.6% 32.3% 35.8% FKWL
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 55/100 37/100 53/100 CIEN

Percentile Scorecard

CIENFKWLCSCO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCIENFKWLCSCO
Valuation 21 #89 of 112 30 #79 of 112 32 #77 of 112
Growth 94 #7 of 108 1 #107 of 108 38 #67 of 108
Profitability 83 #19 of 104 16 #88 of 104 86 #15 of 104
Financial Health 41 #69 of 116 63 #44 of 116 29 #83 of 116
Shareholder Returns 35 #56 of 85 77 #20 of 85 81 #17 of 85
Overall 55 37 53
  • CIEN ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • FKWL ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • CSCO ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCIENFKWLCSCOSPY
1 month -23.3%-10.0%-8.2% -2.0%
3 months -27.0%-5.3%-15.4% -2.2%
6 months -44.9%-40.4%+9.2% +4.2%
Year to date +28.3%-50.8%+33.7% +10.6%
1 year +58.3%-58.2%+38.3% +10.4%
3 years +583.3%-25.9%+94.2% +73.6%
3 years, per year +89.8%-9.5%+24.8% +20.2%
5 years +393.2%-60.2%+80.3% +61.6%
5 years, per year +37.6%-16.8%+12.5% +10.1%
10 years +1,456.8%-9.7%+239.6% +261.3%
10 years, per year +31.6%-1.0%+13.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCIENFKWLCSCOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.6%32.3%35.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 85.5%36.6%37.6% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.90-0.131.17 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.73-1.801.07 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.7%-69.0%-38.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -52.2%-58.5%-20.8% -3.2%
52-week high $627.00$5.18$130.00 $779.14
52-week low $176.45$2.15$71.04 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCIENFKWLCSCO
P/E now vs peer median 65.1xmedian 30.7x -5.3xmedian 30.7x 30.7xmedian 30.7x
P/S now vs peer median 7.1xmedian 2.6x 0.7xmedian 2.6x 6.4xmedian 2.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 48.1xmedian 18.9x —median 18.9x 23.4xmedian 18.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 52.3xmedian 28.0x -4.0xmedian 28.0x 31.8xmedian 28.0x
P/B now vs peer median 13.9xmedian 2.8x 0.8xmedian 2.8x 8.1xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 1.45median 1.07 0.29median 1.07 11.39median 1.07

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCIENFKWLCSCO
Revenue $6.02B $36.51M $63.33B
Gross profit $2.65B $6.26M $40.86B
Operating income $738.95M -$2.68M $15.37B
Net income $654.41M -$6.92M $13.27B
Free cash flow $814.36M -$6.33M $12.77B
R&D $924.94M $3.23M $9.56B
EPS (diluted) $4.48 $-0.40 $3.33
Cash & equivalents $2.45B – $7.22B
Total debt $3.23B – $29.53B
Shares (diluted) 145.97M 11.78M 3.99B
Enterprise value $31.83B -$98.85M $343.19B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCIENFKWLCSCO
P/E 65.1x -5.3x 30.7x
P/FCF 52.3x -4.0x 31.8x
P/Operating cash flow 40.4x -4.0x 28.7x
P/S 7.1x 0.7x 6.4x
P/B 13.9x 0.8x 8.1x
P/Tangible book 14.8x 0.9x 9.5x
EV/EBITDA 48.1x – 23.4x
EV/EBIT 58.4x -2.5x 27.3x
EV/Revenue 7.2x 0.2x 6.6x
EV/FCF 53.0x -1.1x 32.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 40.9x -1.1x 29.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.45 0.29 11.39

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCIENFKWLCSCO
Revenue growth (1Y) 32.6% -20.8% 11.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.5% -7.4% 3.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 40.6% -21.0% 11.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 13.3% -3.8% 4.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 200.1% 6.5% 30.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 29.1% -4.5% 0.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 364.5% -4,827% 30.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 43.5% -32.9% 1.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 359.9% -1,851% 30.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 44.8% -18.2% 2.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 34.5% -441.4% -0.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 201.2% -49.6% -10.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 34.5% -449.2% -3.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 95.4% -48.6% -12.5%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCIENFKWLCSCO
Gross margin 44.1% 17.1% 64.5%
EBITDA margin 14.9% – 28.3%
Operating margin 12.3% -7.3% 24.3%
Pretax margin 12.1% -19.3% 25.3%
Net margin 10.9% -13.0% 21.0%
FCF margin 13.5% -17.3% 20.2%
Operating cash flow margin 17.5% -17.2% 22.4%
Return on equity 22.0% -20.7% 26.8%
Return on assets 9.3% -14.3% 10.4%
Return on invested capital 12.4% – 15.9%
Return on capital employed 13.1% -8.1% 17.9%
Asset turnover 0.9x 0.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 0.9x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 3.5% – 6.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCIENFKWLCSCO
Debt / assets 40.4% – 22.8%
Debt / equity 1.1x – 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.7x – 0.8x
Debt / FCF 4.0x – 2.3x
Liabilities / assets 61.8% 34.2% 61.2%
Equity / assets 38.2% 65.8% 38.8%
Interest coverage 10.6x – 10.5x
Current ratio 3.8x 2.7x 0.9x
Quick ratio 2.8x 1.4x 0.6x
Cash ratio 1.9x 1.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 6.37 2.81 3.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCIENFKWLCSCO
Dividend yield – 1.9% 1.6%
Net buyback yield -1.1% – 1.4%
Shareholder yield -1.1% 1.9% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCIENFKWLCSCO
Forward P/E 39.5xFY2026 53.8xFY2027 21.7xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $7.60FY2026 $0.04FY2027 $4.74FY2027
EPS growth, next FY +187.9%FY2026 – +9.5%FY2027
EPS growth, the year after +64.7% -50.0% +20.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $6.86BFY2026 $46.08MFY2027 $74.93BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +43.8%FY2026 +26.2%FY2027 +18.3%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +18.0% +19.3% +0.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCIENFKWLCSCO
Held by institutions 93.0% 13.1% 80.1%
Institutions holding 1,224 19 4,049
Change in shares held, QoQ -1.7% +38.6% +5.0%
Institutions buying 733 9 1,849
Institutions selling 379 3 1,818
Buyers to sellers 1.93 3.00 1.02

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CIENFKWLCSCO
CIEN 1.00 -0.06 0.38
FKWL -0.06 1.00 0.00
CSCO 0.38 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CIEN, FKWL and CSCO?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ciena (CIEN) $38.28B, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) $24.98M, Cisco Systems (CSCO) $407.26B.

Which stock is cheaper, CIEN, FKWL and CSCO?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ciena (CIEN) 58.5x, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -5.3x, Cisco Systems (CSCO) 30.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Cisco Systems (CSCO) is cheapest (Ciena (CIEN) 39.5x, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) 53.8x, Cisco Systems (CSCO) 21.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ciena (CIEN) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ciena (CIEN) +32.6%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -20.8%, Cisco Systems (CSCO) +11.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cisco Systems (CSCO) has the highest net margin (Ciena (CIEN) 10.9%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -13.0%, Cisco Systems (CSCO) 21.0%). On return on invested capital, Cisco Systems (CSCO) leads (Ciena (CIEN) 12.4%, Cisco Systems (CSCO) 15.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ciena (CIEN) returned the most: Ciena (CIEN) +58.3%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -58.2%, Cisco Systems (CSCO) +38.3%. Over five years, Ciena (CIEN) compounded fastest (Ciena (CIEN) +37.6%/yr, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) -16.8%/yr, Cisco Systems (CSCO) +12.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) has been the steadiest (Ciena (CIEN) 79.6%, Franklin Wireless (FKWL) 32.3%, Cisco Systems (CSCO) 35.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CIEN, FKWL and CSCO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cisco Systems (CSCO) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.