CHT vs SIFY vs TU Stock Comparison

Chunghwa Telecom, Sify Technologies and Telus Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
$48.19 +4.5% 1M +11.2% 1Y
Market cap
$37.75B
P/E
28.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.90B
Div. yield
–
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
8 wins
SIFY Sify Technologies Ltd
$11.58 -13.3% 1M -6.1% 1Y
Market cap
$887.01M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$384.50M
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
1 win
TU Telus Corp
$8.70 +2.6% 1M -42.2% 1Y
Market cap
$13.17B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$17.13B
Div. yield
0.09%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Chunghwa Telecom leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Chunghwa Telecom 8, Telus 1, Sify Technologies 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHTSIFYTULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $37.75B $887.01M $13.17B CHT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.2x -57.4x -5.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.2x 579.0x 17.1x TU
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.3% +5.7% +0.6% CHT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.0% -4.0% -14.8% CHT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% 5.4% 3.8% CHT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -9.4x 4.3x SIFY
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.09% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.2% -6.1% -42.2% CHT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr -10.7%/yr -17.5%/yr CHT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 13.9% 60.8% 26.3% CHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 52/100 49/100 CHT

Percentile Scorecard

CHTSIFYTU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHTSIFYTU
Valuation 25 #37 of 49 65 #14 of 38 71 #15 of 49
Growth 50 #23 of 45 31 #25 of 36 14 #39 of 45
Profitability 55 #21 of 45 61 #14 of 34 43 #26 of 45
Financial Health 94 #4 of 49 – 27 #36 of 49
Shareholder Returns 42 #22 of 37 – 92 #4 of 37
Overall 53 52 49
  • CHT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • SIFY ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • TU ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHTSIFYTUSPY
1 month +4.5%-13.3%+2.6% -0.8%
3 months +11.8%-20.2%-16.3% +3.5%
6 months +10.5%-22.1%-28.3% +7.0%
Year to date +15.5%-5.0%-33.9% +12.2%
1 year +11.2%-6.1%-42.2% +13.0%
3 years +35.7%+33.1%-45.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year +10.7%+10.0%-18.2% +23.1%
5 years +21.7%-43.2%-61.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year +4.0%-10.7%-17.5% +11.0%
10 years +38.1%+82.1%-45.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +3.3%+6.2%-5.9% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCHTSIFYTUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 13.9%60.8%26.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 14.8%62.0%30.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.102.12-0.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.81-0.10-1.60 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -26.5%-91.8%-71.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.1%-32.8%-41.9% -1.8%
52-week high $48.73$17.24$14.98 $779.14
52-week low $40.74$10.37$7.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHTSIFYTU
P/E now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 11.8x -54.3xmedian 29.6x -5.3xmedian 11.8x
P/S now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 1.1x 2.2xmedian 4.2x 0.8xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 6.8x -22.4xmedian 24.2x 7.0xmedian 6.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.8xmedian 5.7x —median 15.1x 2.7xmedian 5.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 1.3x 4.2xmedian 3.9x 1.4xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.08median 0.24 1.09median 0.38 0.09median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHTSIFYTU
Revenue $7.90B $384.50M $17.13B
Gross profit $2.88B $206.52M –
Operating income $1.61B $39.31M $833.56M
Net income $1.34B -$15.57M -$2.52B
Free cash flow $625.04M – $4.97B
R&D $144.76M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.72 $-0.21 $-1.65
Cash & equivalents $1.32B – $976.14M
Total debt $620.49M $599.45M $54.29B
Shares (diluted) 777.60M 72.46M 1.54B
Enterprise value $29.76B $887.01M $5.77B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHTSIFYTU
P/E 27.9x -54.3x -5.3x
P/FCF 59.8x – 2.7x
P/Operating cash flow – – 3.1x
P/S 4.7x 2.2x 0.8x
P/B 3.3x 4.2x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 3.3x 4.2x -3.3x
EV/EBITDA – -22.4x 7.0x
EV/EBIT 21.8x 36.6x 41.6x
EV/Revenue 4.4x 3.7x 2.0x
EV/FCF 56.0x – 7.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 8.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.08 1.09 0.09

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHTSIFYTU
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.3% 5.7% 0.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.2% -65.1% -2.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.9% 12.2% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 65.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.9% 49.9% -65.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.1% -10.7% -30.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 8.2% 19.3% -4,024%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -0.8% -73.4% -62.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 52.6% 31.2% -548.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.5% -49.8% -61.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 4.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -1.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -11.2% – 15.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.4% – 2.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHTSIFYTU
Gross margin 36.5% 53.7% –
EBITDA margin – -16.7% 28.7%
Operating margin 20.3% 10.2% 4.9%
Pretax margin 21.0% 3.1% 8.1%
Net margin 17.0% -4.0% -14.8%
FCF margin 7.9% – 29.0%
Operating cash flow margin – – 25.2%
Return on equity 11.3% -10.8% -10.0%
Return on assets 1.9% – -1.1%
Return on invested capital 10.7% 5.4% 3.8%
Return on capital employed 2.4% – 2.0%
Asset turnover 0.1x – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – -1.7x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHTSIFYTU
Debt / assets 1.1% – 55.4%
Debt / equity 0.0x 3.0x 2.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – -9.4x 4.3x
Debt / FCF 0.3x – 4.5x
Liabilities / assets 34.0% – 75.2%
Equity / assets 66.0% – 24.8%
Interest coverage 144.6x 2.0x 0.7x
Current ratio 1.2x – 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.0x – 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.7x – 0.1x
Altman Z-score 6.02 – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHTSIFYTU
Dividend yield 3.3% – 16.7%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield 3.3% 0.0% 16.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – -46.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 23.3%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 8.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 11.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHTSIFYTU
Forward P/E 28.2xFY2026 579.0xFY2026 17.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $0.02FY2026 $0.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +8.2%FY2026 – -23.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.5% +150.0% +7.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.63BFY2026 $765.58MFY2026 $15.17BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.1%FY2026 +8.7%FY2026 +1.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.1% +30.6% -9.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHTSIFYTU
Held by institutions 2.6% 4.6% 44.5%
Institutions holding 218 42 291
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +2.8% -4.8%
Institutions buying 136 27 154
Institutions selling 47 4 85
Buyers to sellers 2.89 6.75 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHTSIFYTU
CHT 1.00 0.06 0.21
SIFY 0.06 1.00 -0.05
TU 0.21 -0.05 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHT, SIFY and TU?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) $37.75B, Sify Technologies (SIFY) $887.01M, Telus (TU) $13.17B.

Which company is growing faster?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +8.3%, Sify Technologies (SIFY) +5.7%, Telus (TU) +0.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has the highest net margin (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 17.0%, Sify Technologies (SIFY) -4.0%, Telus (TU) -14.8%). On return on invested capital, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) leads (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 10.7%, Sify Technologies (SIFY) 5.4%, Telus (TU) 3.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) returned the most: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +11.2%, Sify Technologies (SIFY) -6.1%, Telus (TU) -42.2%. Over five years, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) compounded fastest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +4.0%/yr, Sify Technologies (SIFY) -10.7%/yr, Telus (TU) -17.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 0.00%, Sify Technologies (SIFY) 0.00%, Telus (TU) 0.09%. Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) and Sify Technologies (SIFY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been the steadiest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 13.9%, Sify Technologies (SIFY) 60.8%, Telus (TU) 26.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHT, SIFY and TU?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.