CHT vs NBIS vs TMUS Stock Comparison

Chunghwa Telecom, Nebius and T-Mobile US Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
$48.19 +4.5% 1M +11.2% 1Y
Market cap
$37.76B
P/E
28.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.90B
Div. yield
–
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
2 wins
NBIS Nebius Group N.V.
$153.27 -35.4% 1M +30.7% 1Y
Market cap
$40.77B
P/E
45.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.36B
Div. yield
–
Cloud Platforms Technology
4 wins
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc.
$146.93 -11.2% 1M -32.5% 1Y
Market cap
$158.97B
P/E
15.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$92.19B
Div. yield
0.03%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

T-Mobile US leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (T-Mobile US 5, Nebius 4, Chunghwa Telecom 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHTNBISTMUSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $37.76B $40.77B $158.97B TMUS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.2x 45.5x 15.1x TMUS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.0x — 12.9x TMUS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.3% +506.9% +9.7% NBIS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.0% 66.1% 11.5% NBIS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% -3.3% 9.9% CHT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 3.0x 2.5x TMUS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.03% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.2% +30.7% -32.5% NBIS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.0%/yr — +4.7%/yr TMUS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 13.9% 107.0% 35.6% CHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 66/100 65/100 NBIS

Percentile Scorecard

CHTNBISTMUS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHTNBISTMUS
Valuation 25 #37 of 49 78 #9 of 38 48 #26 of 49
Growth 50 #23 of 45 34 #24 of 36 77 #11 of 45
Profitability 55 #21 of 45 76 #9 of 34 86 #7 of 45
Financial Health 94 #4 of 49 76 #10 of 38 35 #32 of 49
Shareholder Returns 42 #22 of 37 – 78 #9 of 37
Overall 53 66 65
  • CHT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • NBIS ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • TMUS ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHTNBISTMUSSPY
1 month +4.5%-35.4%-11.2% -0.8%
3 months +11.8%-18.4%-17.1% +3.5%
6 months +10.5%+5.7%-19.6% +7.0%
Year to date +15.5%+83.1%-27.6% +12.2%
1 year +11.2%+30.7%-32.5% +13.0%
3 years +35.7%—+5.0% +86.3%
3 years, per year +10.7%—+1.6% +23.1%
5 years +21.7%—+26.0% +68.6%
5 years, per year +4.0%—+4.7% +11.0%
10 years +38.1%—+196.8% +258.0%
10 years, per year +3.3%—+11.5% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureCHTNBISTMUSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 13.9%107.0%35.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 14.8%98.4%42.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.103.78-0.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.810.29-0.91 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -26.5%-58.3%-46.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.1%-46.5%-33.8% -1.8%
52-week high $48.73$286.69$221.98 $779.14
52-week low $40.74$73.87$146.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHTNBISTMUS
P/E now vs peer median 27.9xmedian 11.8x 41.5xmedian 29.6x 15.1xmedian 11.8x
P/S now vs peer median 4.7xmedian 1.1x 28.6xmedian 4.2x 1.7xmedian 1.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 6.8x 231.6xmedian 24.2x 7.3xmedian 6.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median 59.8xmedian 5.7x 2.4xmedian 15.1x 8.6xmedian 5.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 1.3x 3.8xmedian 3.9x 2.8xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.08median 0.24 -0.59median 0.38 0.63median 0.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHTNBISTMUS
Revenue $7.90B $1.36B $92.19B
Gross profit $2.88B $1.01B $57.33B
Operating income $1.61B -$668.60M $18.25B
Net income $1.34B $61.60M $10.56B
Free cash flow $625.04M $16.40B $18.40B
R&D $144.76M $356.40M –
EPS (diluted) $1.72 $3.17 $9.76
Cash & equivalents $1.32B $8.04B $2.83B
Total debt $620.49M $25.23B $84.62B
Shares (diluted) 777.60M 282.72M 1.08B
Enterprise value $29.78B $14.20B $143.72B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHTNBISTMUS
P/E 27.9x 41.5x 15.1x
P/FCF 59.8x 2.4x 8.6x
P/Operating cash flow – 7.4x 5.5x
P/S 4.7x 28.6x 1.7x
P/B 3.3x 3.8x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 3.3x 3.8x -3.8x
EV/EBITDA – 231.6x 7.3x
EV/EBIT 21.8x -58.8x 13.1x
EV/Revenue 4.4x 29.0x 2.6x
EV/FCF 56.0x 2.4x 13.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 7.5x 8.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.08 -0.59 0.63

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHTNBISTMUS
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.3% 506.9% 9.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.2% -83.4% 5.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.9% 631.9% 7.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.8% -81.7% 7.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.9% -49.0% -5.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.1% -26.7% 17.6%
Net income growth (1Y) 8.2% -73.4% -13.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -0.8% -90.6% 19.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 52.6% 318.1% -9.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.5% -70.8% 23.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 1,193% 13.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -55.8% 18.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -11.2% 1,310% 11.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.4% -47.1% 62.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHTNBISTMUS
Gross margin 36.5% 74.3% 62.2%
EBITDA margin – 12.5% 35.4%
Operating margin 20.3% -49.3% 19.8%
Pretax margin 21.0% 5.3% 15.0%
Net margin 17.0% 66.1% 11.5%
FCF margin 7.9% 1,210% 20.0%
Operating cash flow margin – 388.0% 31.3%
Return on equity 11.3% 0.7% 18.8%
Return on assets 1.9% 0.2% 4.9%
Return on invested capital 10.7% -3.3% 9.9%
Return on capital employed 2.4% -2.9% 9.6%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.1x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 85.4x 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 13.9% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHTNBISTMUS
Debt / assets 1.1% 30.6% 39.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.8x 1.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – 3.0x 2.5x
Debt / FCF 0.3x 0.5x 4.6x
Liabilities / assets 34.0% 63.0% 73.7%
Equity / assets 66.0% 37.0% 26.3%
Interest coverage 144.6x -2.8x –
Current ratio 1.2x 4.0x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.0x 3.5x 0.4x
Cash ratio 0.7x 3.4x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 6.02 1.79 1.47

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHTNBISTMUS
Dividend yield 3.3% – 2.8%
Net buyback yield – 7,333% 7.6%
Shareholder yield 3.3% 7,333% 10.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 41.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 23.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 15.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHTNBISTMUS
Forward P/E 28.0xFY2026 – 12.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.72FY2026 $-1.88FY2026 $11.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +8.9%FY2026 – +16.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.5% – +30.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.64BFY2026 $3.25BFY2026 $96.73BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.2%FY2026 +512.5%FY2026 +9.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.1% +248.5% +6.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHTNBISTMUS
Held by institutions 2.6% 66.4% 43.1%
Institutions holding 218 1,052 1,656
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +29.6% +4.7%
Institutions buying 136 694 849
Institutions selling 47 274 630
Buyers to sellers 2.89 2.53 1.35

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHTNBISTMUS
CHT 1.00 -0.05 0.16
NBIS -0.05 1.00 -0.32
TMUS 0.16 -0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHT, NBIS and TMUS?

T-Mobile US (TMUS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) $37.76B, Nebius (NBIS) $40.77B, T-Mobile US (TMUS) $158.97B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHT, NBIS and TMUS?

T-Mobile US (TMUS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.2x, Nebius (NBIS) 45.5x, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 15.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, T-Mobile US (TMUS) is cheapest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.0x, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 12.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Nebius (NBIS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +8.3%, Nebius (NBIS) +506.9%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) +9.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nebius (NBIS) has the highest net margin (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 17.0%, Nebius (NBIS) 66.1%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 11.5%). On return on invested capital, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) leads (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 10.7%, Nebius (NBIS) -3.3%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 9.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Nebius (NBIS) returned the most: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +11.2%, Nebius (NBIS) +30.7%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) -32.5%. Over five years, T-Mobile US (TMUS) compounded fastest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +4.0%/yr, T-Mobile US (TMUS) +4.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 0.00%, Nebius (NBIS) 0.00%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 0.03%. Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) and Nebius (NBIS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been the steadiest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 13.9%, Nebius (NBIS) 107.0%, T-Mobile US (TMUS) 35.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHT, NBIS and TMUS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, T-Mobile US (TMUS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.