CHT vs EQIX vs GDS Stock Comparison

Chunghwa Telecom, Equinix and GDS Holdings Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
CHT Chunghwa Telecom Co Ltd
$48.52 +5.2% 1M +13.0% 1Y
Market cap
$37.64B
P/E
28.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.90B
Div. yield
3.32%
Wireless Carriers Communication Services
5 wins
EQIX Equinix Inc
$999.38 -0.9% 1M +18.6% 1Y
Market cap
$98.61B
P/E
64.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.81B
Div. yield
2.02%
Data Centers Technology
2 wins
GDS GDS Holdings Ltd
$22.81 -30.4% 1M -36.5% 1Y
Market cap
$4.71B
P/E
8.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.75B
Div. yield
–
Data Centers Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

GDS Holdings leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (GDS Holdings 5, Chunghwa Telecom 5, Equinix 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionCHTEQIXGDSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $37.64B $98.61B $4.71B EQIX
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.1x 64.3x 8.2x GDS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 28.4x 56.8x 43.9x CHT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.3% +9.6% +15.8% GDS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 17.0% 15.6% 30.1% GDS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% 5.6% 1.0% CHT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.0x 3.1x GDS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 3.32% 2.02% — CHT
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +13.0% +18.6% -36.5% EQIX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +4.2%/yr +3.4%/yr -18.0%/yr CHT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 13.9% 26.0% 56.9% CHT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 56/100 69/100 GDS

Percentile Scorecard

CHTEQIXGDS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisCHTEQIXGDS
Valuation 25 #37 of 49 35 #25 of 38 95 #3 of 38
Growth 50 #23 of 45 37 #23 of 36 57 #16 of 36
Profitability 55 #21 of 45 82 #7 of 34 73 #10 of 34
Financial Health 94 #4 of 49 49 #20 of 38 51 #19 of 38
Shareholder Returns 42 #22 of 37 75 #6 of 21 –
Overall 53 56 69
  • CHT ranked among 51 companies in Telecommunications
  • EQIX ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing
  • GDS ranked among 39 companies in Cloud Computing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodCHTEQIXGDSSPY
1 month +5.2%-0.9%-30.4% -0.2%
3 months +12.1%-3.4%-25.5% +3.9%
6 months +11.4%-7.2%-45.4% +8.2%
Year to date +16.3%+30.4%-34.6% +12.9%
1 year +13.0%+18.6%-36.5% +12.3%
3 years +36.7%+40.7%+137.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year +11.0%+12.1%+33.5% +23.3%
5 years +22.6%+17.9%-62.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year +4.2%+3.4%-18.0% +10.9%
10 years +41.9%+184.3%— +261.1%
10 years, per year +3.6%+11.0%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureCHTEQIXGDSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 13.9%26.0%56.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 14.8%23.1%58.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.100.561.99 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.930.72-0.64 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -26.5%-40.4%-91.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -0.4%-10.4%-52.0% -1.2%
52-week high $48.73$1,115.94$47.52 $779.14
52-week low $40.74$726.09$22.14 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleCHTEQIXGDS
P/E now vs peer median 28.1xmedian 11.8x 64.3xmedian 29.5x 8.2xmedian 29.5x
P/S now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 1.1x 10.1xmedian 4.5x 2.7xmedian 4.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 6.8x 26.9xmedian 23.9x 11.1xmedian 23.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 60.2xmedian 5.9x -38.2xmedian 15.0x 4.9xmedian 15.0x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 1.2x 6.9xmedian 4.3x 1.1xmedian 4.3x
PEG now vs peer median 2.09median 0.24 2.98median 0.38 0.12median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsCHTEQIXGDS
Revenue $7.90B $9.81B $1.75B
Gross profit $2.88B $5.05B $436.56M
Operating income $1.61B $2.14B $82.93M
Net income $1.34B $1.53B $542.46M
Free cash flow $625.04M -$2.58B $952.99M
R&D $144.76M – $4.66M
EPS (diluted) $1.72 $15.46 $2.57
Cash & equivalents $1.32B $979.00M $2.20B
Total debt $620.49M $19.70B $15.20B
Shares (diluted) 777.60M 99.14M 205.57M
Enterprise value $30.13B $87.16B -$3.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricCHTEQIXGDS
P/E 28.1x 64.3x 8.2x
P/FCF 60.2x -38.2x 4.9x
P/Operating cash flow – 25.0x 9.2x
P/S 4.8x 10.1x 2.7x
P/B 3.3x 6.9x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 3.3x 7.5x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – 26.9x 11.1x
EV/EBIT 22.0x 54.3x 78.8x
EV/Revenue 4.5x 11.8x 3.7x
EV/FCF 56.4x -44.9x 6.9x
EV/Operating cash flow – 29.4x 12.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.09 2.98 0.12

Growth

14 metrics
MetricCHTEQIXGDS
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.3% 9.6% 15.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 7.2% 8.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.9% 12.7% 27.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.8% 8.2% 14.4%
Operating income growth (1Y) 6.9% 44.5% -57.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 1.1% 17.1% -5.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 8.2% 54.2% -14.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -0.8% 23.8% 71.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 52.6% 52.5% -26.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.5% 21.6% 65.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 12.9% 15.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 9.4% 20.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -11.2% -860.2% 3.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 2.4% -142.7% -11.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricCHTEQIXGDS
Gross margin 36.5% 51.5% 24.9%
EBITDA margin – 44.1% 33.5%
Operating margin 20.3% 21.8% 4.7%
Pretax margin 21.0% 17.4% 14.8%
Net margin 17.0% 15.6% 30.1%
FCF margin 7.9% -26.3% 54.3%
Operating cash flow margin – 40.2% 29.3%
Return on equity 11.3% 10.7% 12.5%
Return on assets 1.9% 3.7% 4.4%
Return on invested capital 10.7% 5.6% 1.0%
Return on capital employed 2.4% 5.8% 0.8%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 2.6x 0.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 5.4% 2.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricCHTEQIXGDS
Debt / assets 1.1% 48.0% 31.9%
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.4x 0.9x
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.0x 3.1x
Debt / FCF 0.3x -7.6x 4.2x
Liabilities / assets 34.0% 65.0% 64.8%
Equity / assets 66.0% 35.0% 35.2%
Interest coverage 144.6x 3.8x 0.4x
Current ratio 1.2x 1.1x 1.8x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.9x 1.4x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.6x 1.1x
Altman Z-score 6.04 2.88 0.62

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricCHTEQIXGDS
Dividend yield 3.3% 2.0% –
Net buyback yield – -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 3.3% 1.9% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusCHTEQIXGDS
Forward P/E 28.4xFY2026 56.8xFY2026 43.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.71FY2026 $17.61FY2026 $0.52FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +8.2%FY2026 +28.0%FY2026 +550.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.5% +10.8% -103.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $7.63BFY2026 $10.81BFY2026 $1.96BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.1%FY2026 +17.3%FY2026 +20.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +12.1% -0.7% +1.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersCHTEQIXGDS
Held by institutions 2.6% 97.5% 50.9%
Institutions holding 218 1,356 198
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.3% +3.3% +15.4%
Institutions buying 136 727 120
Institutions selling 47 420 61
Buyers to sellers 2.89 1.73 1.97

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

CHTEQIXGDS
CHT 1.00 0.00 0.04
EQIX 0.00 1.00 0.20
GDS 0.04 0.20 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, CHT, EQIX and GDS?

Equinix (EQIX) is the largest by market capitalisation: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) $37.64B, Equinix (EQIX) $98.61B, GDS Holdings (GDS) $4.71B.

Which stock is cheaper, CHT, EQIX and GDS?

GDS Holdings (GDS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.1x, Equinix (EQIX) 64.3x, GDS Holdings (GDS) 8.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) is cheapest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 28.4x, Equinix (EQIX) 56.8x, GDS Holdings (GDS) 43.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

GDS Holdings (GDS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +8.3%, Equinix (EQIX) +9.6%, GDS Holdings (GDS) +15.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

GDS Holdings (GDS) has the highest net margin (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 17.0%, Equinix (EQIX) 15.6%, GDS Holdings (GDS) 30.1%). On return on invested capital, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) leads (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 10.7%, Equinix (EQIX) 5.6%, GDS Holdings (GDS) 1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Equinix (EQIX) returned the most: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +13.0%, Equinix (EQIX) +18.6%, GDS Holdings (GDS) -36.5%. Over five years, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) compounded fastest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) +4.2%/yr, Equinix (EQIX) +3.4%/yr, GDS Holdings (GDS) -18.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has the highest dividend yield: Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 3.32%, Equinix (EQIX) 2.02%. GDS Holdings (GDS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) has been the steadiest (Chunghwa Telecom (CHT) 13.9%, Equinix (EQIX) 26.0%, GDS Holdings (GDS) 56.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, CHT, EQIX and GDS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, GDS Holdings (GDS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.